Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
oh sorry I got another question if you don't mind trying, does it support caching? aka using the app offline

like idk if you have an android phone, but if you do, could you try https://messages.google.com/web/authentication and see if after you've synced your phone, you're able to use the app even without wifi on your Mac

another idea if you have YouTube premium, install a web app for it, then download a video inside it (using your premium subscription) and see if it works offline

but now something I REAAALY need, could you please, for the love of god, install google.keep and see if you're able to access it offline, that'd be a life saver for me, as im unable to find a cross platform note taking app. please if you can , try it https://keep.google.com/
Sadly no offline access. I went offline and was able to add notes to Keep, but when I closed it and reopened, it wouldn’t let me in without internet. And when I reconnected, none of the offline notes were there. I even tried soft close (Cmd W/Red button) but no dice.
 
t
Sadly no offline access. I went offline and was able to add notes to Keep, but when I closed it and reopened, it wouldn’t let me in without internet. And when I reconnected, none of the offline notes were there. I even tried soft close (Cmd W/Red button) but no dice.
thank you so much for trying brother

have you any idea of a cross platform app that works offline? being a mac/ipad/android user is hard dude
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brad7
Yes, they automatically show in Launchpad and in your user Applications folder (not in the general Applications folder with the other apps).
gotcha, just like chrome webapps then! it also means they're installed just for you, and not for all users, while regular applications are available to ANY user./profile

but can you NOT move them to general applications folder, manually?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brad7
gotcha, just like chrome webapps then! it also means they're installed just for you, and not for all users, while regular applications are available to ANY user./profile

but can you NOT move them to general applications folder, manually?
Interesting, yes, they can indeed be moved over. I just dragged them over and they moved over completely.
 
It's ridiculous that it took this much, but I'll resume using Safari as my main browser after more than a decade, thanks to the new Profiles feature.
Tab Groups are also insanely useful. In my job I have to work on multiple projects and frequently have half a dozen tabs open for each. Now (as long as I'm careful), I can just switch from project to project in a single browser window. When I come back to a project, the tabs are exactly as I left them. SO much better than just leaving stuff open or trying to make bookmarks for groups of tabs.

Works great for personal use as well. If I'm researching air conditioners, I can open 15 tabs related to that, save it as a tab group, and then close the whole window knowing I can come back to it any time. Also, all this syncs with iCloud so you can start on one Mac (or iPhone or iPad) and pick back up on another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: harshar
PWAs (Web Apps) FTW. It took Apple long enough, but it appears they have fully committed. Thanks Apple. Not many remember, but this comes full circle. Steve believed in web apps promise and Apple committed to them initially, but the tech was not there hence XCode & the App Store. Now PWAs are really amazingly powerful, and most apps in the App Store could and should be PWAs -- notably since browsers have been working a long time on privacy protection while running in a very unfriendly environment (the www). Anyway, I now have to go update my app instructions re: running it as a PWA on Mac which previously noted the strange lack of PWAs on Safari Mac (while they are quite good on iOS & ipadOS). Edge & Chrome can now take a back seat to Safari - yeah.
 
Just tried - it opens independently. 👍
Remember, Safari is still running the web app as if it were a web page. The difference it that it appears to be a stand-alone app, and all the HTML, JS, CSS, etc. files get downloaded, and your app local storage area is now separate from your browser content. The latter point is very important because local storage can be deleted somewhat arbitrarily by your browser, and is much safer re: deletion if it is a web app.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Brad7
PWAs (Web Apps) FTW. It took Apple long enough, but it appears they have fully committed. Thanks Apple. Not many remember, but this comes full circle. Steve believed in web apps promise and Apple committed to them initially, but the tech was not there hence XCode & the App Store. Now PWAs are really amazingly powerful, and most apps in the App Store could and should be PWAs -- notably since browsers have been working a long time on privacy protection while running in a very unfriendly environment (the www). Anyway, I now have to go update my app instructions re: running it as a PWA on Mac which previously noted the strange lack of PWAs on Safari Mac (while they are quite good on iOS & ipadOS). Edge & Chrome can now take a back seat to Safari - yeah.

I think you're confused about what PWAs (Progressive Web Apps) are. Safari isn't magically converting websites into PWAs. Safari on macOS has supported PWAs for years. This Sonoma feature is simply the same as what iOS does when you add a website to the Home screen. It creates a mini "website wrapper" app that loads that specific website when launched. Third-party solutions have solved this for years, and now it's a native macOS feature.

PWAs requires that a website be built in a certain way to allow for "offline" usage. The app can continue to operate via JavaScript-based "web workers" without an internet connection, and can then send data to the server once that connection is re-established. It brings a more natural "native-like" behaviour to web apps.

Yes — when a web app IS built as a PWA, and then it truly does behave like a local, native app, but these are two different technologies at play.
 
oh sorry I got another question if you don't mind trying, does it support caching? aka using the app offline

like idk if you have an android phone, but if you do, could you try https://messages.google.com/web/authentication and see if after you've synced your phone, you're able to use the app even without wifi on your Mac

another idea if you have YouTube premium, install a web app for it, then download a video inside it (using your premium subscription) and see if it works offline

but now something I REAAALY need, could you please, for the love of god, install google.keep and see if you're able to access it offline, that'd be a life saver for me, as im unable to find a cross platform note taking app. please if you can , try it https://keep.google.com/

You're thinking about PWAs (Progressive Web Apps), which is not what this Sonoma feature is. The website itself would need to be built as a PWA to work offline. This Sonoma feature works for EVERY website — regular websites, regular web apps that require a server connection, and PWAs, which can work offline.

This Sonoma feature is not some magical PWA wrapper. The developer of the web app still needs to implement the web workers to make it a true PWA.

To answer your question, this is like a "mini web browser" for a single web app/site, so yes, all of the standard browser features would be there — caching, history, etc. But it's isolated from the main Safari browser, and would have a simplified interface.
 
These things actually sound really useful in daily life, but what I want to know is, did they fix all the bugs in Mail that crept in since Mojave? In Ventura I have to have most of my email handled by a third-party program!
I don't know how many bugs they fixed in mail, but there is a new one. When the system wakes up, mail looks like has crashed during sleep.
 


FaceTime UI and Reactions

Apple has changed the way FaceTime integrates with the menu bar. The video effects options no longer appear in the Control Center, and instead have a new home in a dedicated green FaceTime menu bar item, which also includes a mini webcam view and buttons to trigger Reactions.

macos-sonoma-tidbits1.jpg

Reactions include Love, Like, Dislike, Balloons, Rain, Confetti, Lasers, and Fireworks. Some reactions are even triggered automatically by the user's physical actions: One thumb up triggers a Like, and two thumbs up are attended by Fireworks. Similarly, one thumb down counts as a dislike, and two thumbs down initiates a rain shower.

Infantilization of the UI continues...
 
Who remembers the days when you had to purchase the next macOS release? We live in an entirely different (and spoiled) world now.

I'd gladly go back to paying for a rock solid, de-emojified and bloatware free macOS.

The yearly updates have destroyed the core stability of the OS while adding superficial "features" no one asked for.
 
You're thinking about PWAs (Progressive Web Apps), which is not what this Sonoma feature is. The website itself would need to be built as a PWA to work offline. This Sonoma feature works for EVERY website — regular websites, regular web apps that require a server connection, and PWAs, which can work offline.

This Sonoma feature is not some magical PWA wrapper. The developer of the web app still needs to implement the web workers to make it a true PWA.

To answer your question, this is like a "mini web browser" for a single web app/site, so yes, all of the standard browser features would be there — caching, history, etc. But it's isolated from the main Safari browser, and would have a simplified interface.

thanks for clarification , but it could still allow cahing like pwa right? if the website dev adds service worker , it could work offline, too
 
  • Like
Reactions: coolfactor
You're thinking about PWAs (Progressive Web Apps), which is not what this Sonoma feature is. The website itself would need to be built as a PWA to work offline. This Sonoma feature works for EVERY website — regular websites, regular web apps that require a server connection, and PWAs, which can work offline.

This Sonoma feature is not some magical PWA wrapper. The developer of the web app still needs to implement the web workers to make it a true PWA.

To answer your question, this is like a "mini web browser" for a single web app/site, so yes, all of the standard browser features would be there — caching, history, etc. But it's isolated from the main Safari browser, and would have a simplified interface.
I was wondering why no manifest was needed. I guess Apple has replaced the service worker with something else. Still happy that Apple has perhaps "extended" the concept of a web app. The manifest, service worker etc. were a layer of complexity that perhaps is not needed. Making "any page" a web app is a really good solution (as long as local storage independence stays the same). Will test our setup soon re: new Safari.
 
Safari on macOS has supported PWAs for years.
Not sure why/how you mean this. Here is what Apple support site says prior to current Safari update:

...However, you can't with the Safari browser. Apple are sadly years behind with allowing this but if you can bring yourself to do it......

Link:

We looked for a means to instruct users how to install our page as a web app with Safari, but could find nothing. All web content related to this issue said Safari Mac did not support PWAs. Likely we missed something, but if it was that hard to find it was of no use to parents looking to install our FOSS math app as a PWA.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.