Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
We have a saying: “If you don't know what it's about, it's about money.” It is well known that many programmers have left the OCLP team. And it's no surprise, because everyone needs to earn a living . And the effort put into OCLP is probably enormous. The alternative OCLP-mod project Laobamac has also been suspended... Or, as they say, I have other projects on my mind .
Unfortunately, money is like oil in a working machine; when it runs out, the machine jams and refuses to work .
My suggestion is to commercialize the OCLP app; it could cost $5 or $10... All in all, a small price to pay for giving old Mac models a second life ) I don't know how many potential OCLP users there are, but perhaps... tens of thousands... And that already adds up to a considerable amount for development.
They have a "donate" option. Plus...if you try to make money, then you have to make sure all of the coding or tech is yours etc. unless you bought it. Copyright info. etc. Too much of a pain if you set it up as a product for sale.

You have to think...If you are able to do this type of stuff, then you are at times getting info., breaking etc. from various means etc. When you "hack" it is already shady ground JUST by word alone. Not making money is a good legal determents and allows flying under the radar.

Also, think..."if" the old developers are now working at Apple in the security department...that says something. LOL
 
  • Love
Reactions: olad
I want to say that I can't work on OCLP anymore for a few reasons, mostly due to serious mental health conditions. There will be no new patches or updates coming from me.
Thank you very much friend @educovas ! We all love you and are spiritually close to you!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you were the main developer responsible for the functioning of nVidia Kepler graphics cards in OCLP.
So I think of you and bless you especially, along with Mykola Grymalyuk (alias @khronokernel) and others, whenever I work perfectly with Sonoma and my super-powered 27" iMac 14,2 late 2013 CPUi7 and nVidia GTX780M 4 GB VRAM.
Thank you 🙏 and may Heaven protect you and heal you as soon as possible!

Note
Without your help, unfortunately, I think I'll have to resign myself to never using Sequoia, which I abandoned after six months because the malfunctioning of Preview and AirPlay (mainly from YouTube of my iPhone 12 to Mac) was driving me crazy.
Given my personality, sigh…, it’s impossible for me to accept working with a Mac that isn't completely stable and perfect... Sob! 🥲
 
Last edited:
I want to say that I can't work on OCLP anymore for a few reasons, mostly due to serious mental health conditions. There will be no new patches or updates coming from me.

You didn’t have to post this — but you did.
Thank you.
Thank you for taking the time to help complete strangers with their old Macs, posts you didn’t have to post and giving your energy and time to OCLP project. Look after yourself first, patches or not we all wish you the best .
 
We have a saying: “If you don't know what it's about, it's about money.” It is well known that many programmers have left the OCLP team. And it's no surprise, because everyone needs to earn a living . And the effort put into OCLP is probably enormous. The alternative OCLP-mod project Laobamac has also been suspended... Or, as they say, I have other projects on my mind .
Unfortunately, money is like oil in a working machine; when it runs out, the machine jams and refuses to work .
My suggestion is to commercialize the OCLP app; it could cost $5 or $10... All in all, a small price to pay for giving old Mac models a second life ) I don't know how many potential OCLP users there are, but perhaps... tens of thousands... And that already adds up to a considerable amount for development.
Rather than posting a slurry of consistently off-the-mark contentions, have you considered making a donation? Many of us have and a whole lot more than 5 or 10 dollars. Talk is cheap!
 
Last edited:
But Intel PC owners can enter for free.
Well, much of the point was related to the fact that Intel MacOS is ending in the not too distant future. So if you want to stick with MacOS you will need to move to Apple hardware unless something changes and it becomes possible to run MacOS on alternate Arm based chips. That is not very likely though.
 
MBP11,1: updated to 26.3 from .2 on external SSD, using USB installer and OCLP 300 nightly (4 Dec 25) for EFI.
Runs well enough to post this (no post install patching). Cable Ethernet available.

A peculiarity on this machine with Tahoe (since first betas): it KPs when shutting down. Doesn't really matter, manual power off/restart needed after each phase of installer, or when shutting down the running Tahoe.

So the MBP11,1 is now as up-to-date as possible: Sequoia 15.7.4 with OCLP 2.4.1 on internal SSD,Tahoe 26.3 with OCLP macos-next 3.0.0n (EFI only) on USB SSD.

Thank you developers!
 

Attachments

  • Bildschirmfoto 2026-02-13 um 18.49.12.png
    Bildschirmfoto 2026-02-13 um 18.49.12.png
    337.5 KB · Views: 123
Last edited:
I want to say that I can't work on OCLP anymore for a few reasons, mostly due to serious mental health conditions. There will be no new patches or updates coming from me.
I am very sorry to hear that, I hope you will recover, regardless me and everyone that has used OCLP thank you very very very much for all the work you put in the project. We respect people like you, you are the biggest reason I was able to land a job in the biggest company in Saudi Arabia, I installed the latest sequoia os on my 2012 MBP and was able to apply for it. Thank you very much god bless you, god bless all of us. 💜
 
Like... people are here just posting testing results when one of the most important contributors has stepped away from the patcher. It's like walking past the scene of an accident and sayin "oh well, glad it wasn't me" not even thinking about the ramifications of what just happened.

I feel many here might not have a clear understanding of how important of a contributor @educovas was to OCLP.

This also applies to all the other maintainers who have worked on the project, especially Mykola. I can't tell you how many hours and hours I spent with Mykola working on different upgrade paths, UI changes and fixes. I'll be completely honest, I really really miss those times. I will always cherish being able to work with one of the most brilliant developers I've ever met.

I need to be CLEAR on this - the core group with @dhinakg at the head is still very strong and I have the upmost confidence in them!!! 👍 The project is in good hands and having the original co founder and developer heading up the project is exactly what you want.

I just can't get past the feeling that open source software is both a blessing and a curse. Wonderful in the fact that the software is now open to thousands of users free of charge! Yet, the demands of users on the maintainers is almost unbearable. The reality is that thousands and thousands of users are running OCLP. They are so grateful that it is bringing new life to their old Mac. The problem? Some of the most vocal people are also the most negative. If you don't think that hits hard, then try doing what they do every day. You can read through 50 nice comments and that one super negative comment hits so hard. It's also so easy to play arm-chair quarterback and say "OH no big deal, who gives a crap what they say". It just hits different when you pour so much of your time into something like this only for it to get crapped on. Did you just work 9 hours at your regular job? Oh well now you have to put in another 5 debugging code for people demanding WHERE IS THE TAHOE UPDATE>!?!?!

Oh and don't forget if someone lifts your code and claims it theirs or "improved". Imagine poring hundreds of ours into something only to find out someone is pawning it off as "oh look how simple this is, it works!" Was that tested against 80 models? Was the security of that app and how it applies patches examined or implemented correctly? WHO CARES RIGHT? Don't get me wrong, anyone can fork an open source project. BUT!! The idea is to help contribute to that project NOT to take it as your own.

I also understand that putting out a nightly test patch is the way open some source software projects works. But we need to look it in reality. That software is for advanced users to test with the full acknowledgment that it might fail or wreck your Mac. Instead, we have unskilled users trying it out and then wrecking their system. They then head over to the OCLP discord and Reddit demanding help. WHY IS MY SYSTEM BROKE?

I think you can tell at this point that I'm very passionate about this software. I truly do believe in the mission of keeping old hardware alive and out of the dump. Plus the brilliant developers who contributed to this project really deserve credit. They worked together to put something genuinely amazing into the world that has helped thousands of people.

No one can ever take that away from you. Thank you.
 
I want to say that I can't work on OCLP anymore for a few reasons, mostly due to serious mental health conditions. There will be no new patches or updates coming from me.

Thank you for everything you have done for OCLP - your work has become a significant portion of the patcher, and OCLP would not have been the same without you. Your impact will last for many years on many machines.

Please take care of yourself and your health.
 
I just want to say that OCLP has saved my bacon so many times in various ways! I am super thankful for the project and very content to wait for the Tahoe version. Thank you greatly to everyone who has contributed and don't let the haters get you down!
 
It is impossible not to appreciate OCLP for the Hackintosh community. Especially since some of us have the latest computers whose performance may even exceed that of the latest Macs.
In this context, it is worth paying attention to the OCLP-mod from programmer Laobamac. It seems that this is not just a regular “nightly version,” but contains its own proprietary solutions. I am talking special about the “modern wireless” patch, which works very well.
Perhaps it would be worthwhile to join forces and bring this project to a state where at least some of the features are functional.
 
  • Like
Reactions: olad
It is impossible not to appreciate OCLP for the Hackintosh community. Especially since some of us have the latest computers whose performance may even exceed that of the latest Macs.
In this context, it is worth paying attention to the OCLP-mod from programmer Laobamac. It seems that this is not just a regular “nightly version,” but contains its own proprietary solutions. I am talking special about the “modern wireless” patch, which works very well.
Perhaps it would be worthwhile to join forces and bring this project to a state where at least some of the features are functional.
Is it Working on a macbook pro 2014 i7? If yes i might try this mod
 
I want to say that I can't work on OCLP anymore for a few reasons, mostly due to serious mental health conditions. There will be no new patches or updates coming from me.

Thank you for the years with OCLP Edu, take care of yourself and wishing the best for your new endeavors.

It is impossible not to appreciate OCLP for the Hackintosh community. Especially since some of us have the latest computers whose performance may even exceed that of the latest Macs.
In this context, it is worth paying attention to the OCLP-mod from programmer Laobamac. It seems that this is not just a regular “nightly version,” but contains its own proprietary solutions. I am talking special about the “modern wireless” patch, which works very well.
Perhaps it would be worthwhile to join forces and bring this project to a state where at least some of the features are functional.
All patches in OCLP-Mod are from the original OCLP devs. OCLP-Mod is just a fork of OCLP with removed root patch block that OCLP had deliberately set.
 
Last edited:
I just can't get past the feeling that open source software is both a blessing and a curse. Wonderful in the fact that the software is now open to thousands of users free of charge! Yet, the demands of users on the maintainers is almost unbearable. The reality is that thousands and thousands of users are running OCLP. They are so grateful that it is bringing new life to their old Mac. The problem? Some of the most vocal people are also the most negative. If you don't think that hits hard, then try doing what they do every day. You can read through 50 nice comments and that one super negative comment hits so hard. It's also so easy to play arm-chair quarterback and say "OH no big deal, who gives a crap what they say". It just hits different when you pour so much of your time into something like this only for it to get crapped on. Did you just work 9 hours at your regular job? Oh well now you have to put in another 5 debugging code for people demanding WHERE IS THE TAHOE UPDATE>!?!?!

Agreed completely. There’s definitely been a detectable tonal shift in the OCLP subreddit over the last few months. Most people on there are still lovely ☺️ but there’s been a few incredibly rude and entitled posts around Tahoe support that have left a bad taste. As you say, it only takes one comment like that to really hurt, especially if you’re just doing something for the love of it.

I guess it’s a double-edged sword. Something like OCLP absolutely needs a wide audience to have the maximum benefit for older Macs that would otherwise just get thrown away, and the recent UI/process improvements have made it so much more accessible for regular users (I mean, I’m an idiot, and I’ve never had a problem across multiple machines - though I'm just throwing 15.7.4 onto my Mac Pro, so I guess I've just jinxed that 😅), but the bigger the user base, the more people are going to expect it to ‘just work’ (for want of a better phrase) and lash out when it doesn't. 🙁
 
Thank you for the years with OCLP Edu, take care of yourself and wishing the best for your new endeavors.


All patches in OCLP-Mod are from the original OCLP devs. OCLP-Mod is just a fork of OCLP with removed root patch block that OCLP had deliberately set.
So that OCLP-Mod the Chinese kid made for Tahoe is basically a version of OCLP but changed to support some Tahoe features?(Ie: audio and wireless) Very interesting I actually never thought of It lol. Also I don't know if you know this but. Since educoavs can't work on OCLP any more, is 3.0 never going to happen? Or is it going to happen?. I just hope god blesses us all. ( May god bless us all)
 
So that OCLP-Mod the Chinese kid made for Tahoe is basically a version of OCLP but changed to support some Tahoe features?(Ie: audio and wireless) Very interesting I actually never thought of It lol. Also I don't know if you know this but. Since educoavs can't work on OCLP any more, is 3.0 never going to happen? Or is it going to happen?. I just hope god blesses us all. ( May god bless us all)
Yeah everything in it already existed in OCLP. WiFi patches are public and the AppleHDA.kext is from the 26.0 Beta 1 KDK, anyone can take it and put it into the OS if you know how to add kexts to the snapshot i.e. do a manual root patch.

I'm not the best one to comment on how the project will move forward, so I won't.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.