I would have wanted Apple's new design language to be influenced not by their work on visionOS, but by their work on CarPlay Ultra and that quite pretty and more flat look.I do not understand the strategy behind pushing liquid glass onto every OS.
As Apple have alluded to themselves it’s an attempt to unify the design with visionOS, where it seems that liquid glass works very well in presenting interfaces and controls as tangible floating objects overlaying video passthrough of the surrounding environment.
One immediate glaring issue in translating this to the other OSs is that liquid glass elements which will appear truly 3 dimensional in VR cannot do so on standard screens. So they’re attempting to make some interfaces and controls appear 3D using tried and tested embossing combined with a more modern dynamic transparency effect.
Standard screen design language went through a long phase of having buttons and controls embossed to make them appear physical, to help users clearly identify what they could interact with as they gradually migrated from physical controls into digital controls.
As time has gone on users have grown far more accustomed to screen based interfaces and the need to make controls feel ‘real’ has fallen away as physical controls become less common. As a result screen design language has been simplified, flattening everything out and removing embossed edges to reduce visual clutter, preferring instead to use well laid out concise clearly contrasted controls. It is widely accepted that this has made screen based interfaces better to use, and UX has been improved.
There may be hate here but the few comment I've read and am seeing on this topic re the changes to macOS UI are critical with good some points made.Yeah, cool, I have astigmatism too and I have no idea what you're talking about. I don't need any particular contrast. Maybe there's different types of astigmatism, the regular and the anti-Apple one.
I'm pretty sure their design is driven by the Vision.Vision no longer drives product design and design sure as hell isn't defining function anymore.
I'm pretty sure their design is driven by the Vision.
Agreed, firing random people won't solve much. But, firing and hiring the correct people for the correct job will absolutely help things and have a much higher chance of getting things "fixed" over at Apple versus doing nothing or leaving the teams as-is. That's all I'm saying and think.Wouldn't it be nice if firing several top people really was a way to make a company better. Obviously there's at least as much a chance that would make things worse.
Anyway, I'll never base how I think a new release is or will be from comments here as they skew WAY negative compared to the general public. So far the biggest negative I can see so far is maybe readability issues with the liquid glass and it's looking like there may be enough settings to tweak that to the likes of most users.
Time will tell, but I prefer to assume the best until I actually use it.
That’s a great shout.I would have wanted Apple's new design language to be influenced not by their work on visionOS, but by their work on CarPlay Ultra and that quite pretty and more flat look.
Does anyone have any more Reduce Transparency screenshots to share?
100% this. I've lost count of the times I've gone looking for a file knowing its exact name and still not being able to locate it via Spotlight. It's a complete lost cause if I only know part of the name or get even one character wrong.Spotlight has made it more difficult to search my computer for files. I don’t need to search the internet, just find the files I want. Ugh.
There are several ways to limit searches to your own hard drive. For instance, in Spotlight settings, you can use the Search Privacy and add your drive. That prevents Spotlight from searching the Internet. There are other ways as well, such as just turning off Siri suggestions.100% this. I've lost count of the times I've gone looking for a file knowing its exact name and still not being able to locate it via Spotlight. It's a complete lost cause if I only know part of the name or get even one character wrong.
Spotlight's insistence on showing me vaguely related internet links instead of my own files means that I do a lot of manual searching. At times I'll try going into an app, creating a new blank file and hitting save to see what folder it defaults to. I use a myriad of sub-folders and bounce between work related and personal stuff a lot so the last saved location is often the wrong one, but sometimes I get lucky and find what Spotlight was never going to show me.
Perhaps the worst offender, however, has always been Apple's own support website. I used to work in the software industry and I spent a lot of time on support pages, but searching directly on apple.com was a complete waste of time. It might show a long list of somewhat related articles above the best one, but many times the page I was looking for simply wasn't there at all. I could look through 4 pages of results and still not get what I wanted. Google, on the other hand, usually had the perfect Apple support article as its second hit. Exact same search criteria, completely different results.
It's almost as if Apple deliberately refuses to figure out how to do search.
On Tahoe, open Spotlight, type in the (partial) filename you're after and then press ⌘2.Spotlight has made it more difficult to search my computer for files. I don’t need to search the internet, just find the files I want. Ugh.
I didn't think Apple could be more heavy handed than Aqua, but they proved me wrong. I don't think OS UIs should be such a major distraction.
Sometimes I think I should stop reading about upcoming features, especially since I’m still newer to macOS. I tried to use Spotlight to set a Reminder yesterday. Then I remembered, I can’t do that yet.
Thanks,there's a Alfred workflow for reminders and calendar
![]()
alfred-workflows/workflows/agenda at main · rknightuk/alfred-workflows
My Alfred Workflows. Contribute to rknightuk/alfred-workflows development by creating an account on GitHub.github.com
Read the quote again.It was just Windows NT reskinned for the consumer market.
Thanks,
I've heard about Alfred, not really researched it. From what I have read it sounds like much of what Alfred can do will be built (sherlocked) into OS 26? So I will probably wait it out.