Regarding Qi, the market was already there. Apple historically adds support for these features way later which is both good and bad. It feels they only adopted it because they were behind too far (as usual)
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Magnetically Attached iPhone 12 Wireless Charger Unveiled Ahead of Apple Event
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Regarding Qi, the market was already there. Apple historically adds support for these features way later which is both good and bad. It feels they only adopted it because they were behind too far (as usual)
The chassis is aluminum, so it's non-ferrous (aka, "non-magnetic"), so they're likely implementing internal magnetics of some sort. Electromagnets[?] So they could switch on/off? Activated by the presence of a charger?
Magic? Magnets, how do they work?
I kind of dig on this, attaching/removing a charging cable would be a touch easier, reduce wear on the port (we've had a few iPhone where the port can a little janky, even caused some electrical cross talk that sort of "fried" some cables), and I'd imagine, it's a design bridge between ports and no ports that are planned for some very near term iPhone design.
As I mentioned, Apple did not create Qi wireless charging. That ship sailed before Apple added it to the iPhone and Watch. You can complain about the merits of Qi charging vs plugging in a device, but to suggest that Apple is at fault for applying a technology already in the market, or adapting it to be better / different, is ridiculous.
Personally, I would prefer that Apple implement a charging and data transfer system on the iPhone that uses something more akin to their Smart Connector. This way you could minimize the charging connector to something more like the old MagSafe connector. But again, there is an existing market that continues to grow for Qi charging, so they have to continue down this path, at least until they develop something far superior.
Well thanks for taking the time, but it still doesn't answer the question why is it any better for the end user. The growing Qi market is a side business, and indeed, I would like to see corroborating growth stats that would evidence such a drastic departure in the future. From where I see it Qi is growing but still not that popular.
I agree with you this charter is dumb, but the difference between this and MagSafe is MagSafe still had direct copper-to-copper contact between charger and device, whereas this has no direct electrical contact between charger and device.
Yes, and it was awesome. The Palm Pre wireless charger was, and is still is, the best wireless charger from an ergonomics perspective.
And they need to up speed, range and public availability before I would even touch a wireless only iPhone
One of the cons of using Wireless CarPlay is it uses WiFi in the phone, not bluetooth. When you do Wireless CarPlay, you can't use the hotspot on your phone for others in the car to connect to. It's a pretty specific use case, but it's still a decent con that I'd hope would be resolved by an upgraded radio in the phone to handle the multi-connection scenario before they went portless.
And wireless is only on expensive car models.
[automerge]1602601259[/automerge]
Yea it's a scam to get you to pay for the car Wi-Fi
Umm, not all of us have BMWs with with wireless CarPlay... so to upgrade my phone and still use CarPlay wired means I have to upgrade to a new car too?
I don’t see Apple removing the port altogether. There is just no logic in it and would alienate a good portion of their fans who won’t be able to afford a charging pad or new car to use the features they already were used to.
But then again Apple has done crazier things...
And then, when you go to get your phone, you have this magnetic thing still clinging to it? Hmmm... seems like a step backward than a simple one-handed lift-and-go.
I'd have to think that Apple will put magnets in their official cases if they want this to catch on.
no. a battery case only fits that model and is troublesome to take off or put on. not even close to a battery case.
I think the obvious problem being is that it will need the perfect alignment in order to do fast charging etc. I can almost certainly guarantee that it won't work well with other non-Apple chargers.
Also seems inconvenient. Do you have it on top of the phone or do you have the phone on top of the charger. Every time I pick up the phone I have to remove the charger by hand?
I think this device missed the point, it will work well with a large pad where it will align itself though.
Likewise you never answered why this wouldn’t be better in an Apple Watch implementation, because you know what the answer is.
Who cares about CarPlay? No one uses it. the bigger problem is how are we going to do DFU clean installs?
Because the magsafe on macbooks had a physical connection. This has the connectors on the inside of the phone.
Yes but as someone who uses a lightning to hdmi adapter for my projector, I am forever comforting my equipment around so I can have the phone charging on a pad and still use the lightning port. This will be much better.True... but you can also do that with the existing cable. I use my phone plugged in quite often. Magic!
I see your point though.
One downside to magnets is when you lift your phone off the charging pad. Will the pad stick to it? That's the opposite of what I want from a charging pad. I want the pad to stay on the table when I grab my phone. That's the point of these types of chargers.
The Apple Pad better be heavy enough to stay on the table when you lift the phone. I don't want to be fighting with my charging pad every time I grab my phone.