Yes, I know, but for the time being, I will hold my Ultra 1 as much as I can (watchOS 9). watchOS 10 is horrible for me compared to watchOS 9. Don´t like that degraded colors at all all over the system. New gestures are a mess. Widgets are nonsense on a watch. More or less, I agree with this guy,What's wrong with watchOS 10? When you get a new Watch, you'll have to use it (or whatever the OS is by then..)
Cause iOS 17.4 can´t comunicate with your watchOS 9.where do you get that idea from? why would 17.4 force an watchOS update?
I have deactivated automatic updates, but everytime I charged the Apple Watch, a reminder appears in my display, "watchOS 10 is a available", when I haven´t asked for that. I don´t like it at all.The best way to avoid that is to disagree with the terms and conditions of watchOS10. I used to get nagged every night and one time it tried to update over night and asked me to agree to the T&C. I said no. I have gotten a nag since and am still happily on watchOS 9. So just disagree with the Terms & Conditions.
Is that documented somewhere, link? I do not recall reading about that in any of the MR articles about 17.4Cause iOS 17.4 can´t comunicate with your watchOS 9.
I suffered it myself, if that is enough for you. Had to downgrade from 17.4. You can try and see it.Is that documented somewhere, link? I do not recall reading about that in any of the MR articles about 17.4
I’ve never had a bug in iOS that really bothered me much aside from one that made my watch battery drain and therefore not last a day.
Seems like iOS 15 and 16 received updates today as well, can only assume its security patches for the same or similar vulnerabilities.Do those two security vulnerabilities exist in iOS 16.7.5, which was released 40 days ago?
Safari is not the only apple app integrated into the operating system. And Microsoft does the same thing with other core functionality.Looks like apple is learning from Microsoft by making the OS so closely intertwined with the web browser.🤣
I do. Because when you update, for bug fixes, you'll get new bugs. Otherwise there wouldn't be any bug fixes in an update.
They should separate the bug fixes from sw updates / added sw or emoji type of updates. That way some people could simply download bug fixes without any unasked for sw updates which should result, at some point, a bug-free OS.
macOS Sonoma 14.4 introduces new emoji as well as other features, bug fixes, and security updates for your Mac.
You can be sure that more people are interested in new emoji than security updates. Leading with these as a feature makes a lot of sense for the vast majority of users. Documentation on enterprise-related and security updates is available for those who want it.When "new emoji" is listed before the "other features" like an afterthought - "security updates" seem less important to Apple.
We get an update almost every month and when they need to address an urgent bug they drop updates immediately. Google has had bugs in their core OS apps (that are on the Google Play Store) and they don't address them quicker.Lol need a whole system update to fix a Safari bug? For everything holy Apple please learn from Android and move Safari to the App Store.
Again, Apple does not add new emojis!!!!sloppy coding by apple, their "improved validation" means that they fixed a coding problem. they should have A.I. look over their code for vulnerabilities before releasing a beta to developers to test. crazy that this type of stuff continues to be an issue in todays programming world.
forcing users to update the entire OS for a security patch, I thought we were past this, by enabling a "secure patch" model that let the current OS patch security issues, or were they only able to do this on macOS.
none the less -- apple, stop releasing new Emoji's, no one cares, also, fix your sloppy coding. I continue to see so many bugs of the U.I. and apps that obviously have been poorly programed... eh hem "Home.app", feels like a Hypercard app.
Do you mean every time you write new code you introduce a new bug? I would agree with that statement. The more features your device has the more attack surface for hackers. I worry when Apple updates are described like this:
When "new emoji" is listed before the "other features" like an afterthought - "security updates" seem less important to Apple. It reveals something about Apple. Either they are misjudging what people really care about or they are throwing in emoji to get kids to keep their phones up to date - like a free piece of candy if you update your phone. Who knows why they do this. I would prefer a totally secure phone. The fact that secure phones do exist for certain people and that the status quo for citizens is not that - it makes you wonder why nothing has changed over the past decade.
There is an opportunity for Apple here. They could market a minimalist iPhone that focuses on security and no fluff.