Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Thank you. The advise seems to be clear that the thinkpad is the way to go. I will not be using windows however as some appear to assume. I will boot linux and virtualize XP for the programs that I need. This being said, I already have all the windows licenses I need from being a university student. Is it possible to purchase thinkpads without an operating system? I can load linux (free) and then open up virtual machines that I have already created.

I think this thread has already run its course. If you have any further advise a PM might be a better option and hopefully we can just let this thread die.
 
Yeah, we're totally getting off-topic. This'll be my last on this particular issue...

wingad said:
These are loans, money you have to pay back, so I am more concerned about paying my school bills with this money than accruing other expenses. And you are correct, this is government funds where I was speaking of scholarships.

Whoa--I'm not talking about loans, I'm talking about grants. I think you're talking about merit-aid scholarships as opposed to need-based ones. If that's the case, then sure, those are up to whoever sets them up; I'm saying, though, that federal aid is income-dependent, and not ethnicity-dependent.

I can prove it. I work for the mathematics department and am in charge of receiving scholarship application. I have seen our criteria for being awarded the scholarships. Also try registering for any of the online scholarship search engines. They will probe you for any hint of minority status, from race to sex to sexual orientation, because that is where the available funds are at. Further, I have yet to see you offer any proof of your claims that my statements are false. Just because you are the first to play the "that is false" card does not make you correct.

Yes--for merit scholarships, though (see above). When it's given by non-governmental sources, the people who give out the money can dole it out for whatever reason they choose. I don't think what you're saying is false if you're talking about merit (and not federal)-based financial aid.

Not the primary source of income for the majority? I will agree. In fact I have never disagreed nor stated anything to the opposition. That is why I don't understand why you prefaced that statement with 'however' as if to draw a contradiction to something that I said, but in actuality did not say. My point was, however, that those scholarships could supplement the purchase of a new computer.

Your statement above...

Financial assistance in the form of scholarships almost always has some stipulation about preference going to minority students with some being exclusive. Not every minority gets financial assistance, but a large portion of financial assistance does go to minorities, however.

...suggested as much to me. If you meant merit-based scholarships and not need-based scholarships, why didn't you say so instead of implying the majority of all financial assistance was geared toward minority students?

Again, I wasn't talking about federal assistance. I never once brought it up. It is a red herring that you brought up to make points on an issue I was never commenting on.

If you're going to make big statements about the amount of financial assistance given to minority students, you've got to take the time to distinguish between merit-based scholarships and federal need-based scholarships. That way you don't have to clarify what you were speaking about afterwards. As your comments stood, they strongly implied your non-minority status prevented you from receiving money for school. Multiple people took it that way, so it wasn't exactly an ambiguous statement.

As you did state, the private scholarships that I was talking about can be for anything, many addressing a minority status being favored. I further never said this was a negative. All I was saying by what was a one line comment is that I cannot expect to have very much disposable income that may be the result of being the beneficiary of some scholarship.

I don't see why you're looking at this as if being a minority is the only way to receive private scholarships, though. Even the majority of minority students don't receive minority-focused scholarships; they're typically given to a tiny fraction of eligible applicants. Besides that, there are literally thousands of types of merit-based scholarships that have nothing to do with race, but with states of residence, academic achievement, club memberships, majors, parental occupations, athletic abilities, etc. Beyond those, there's good old government-based aid, which is the only source of aid most students ever receive. Your post implies you're somehow missing out on a big stash of money because you weren't born (insert ethnicity). That's where this is all coming from, bro.

One final comment on all of this: This entire discussion is almost entirely irrelevant to the purpose of this thread. I am disappointed that it has been made such a big deal. All I wanted was to demonstrate that I will not suddenly have any extra money that could be used to better finance an expensive purchase. I do have enough money to buy a MBP, but in doing so I will significantly decrease my savings account, so I want to make it the right decision if I do.

Yeah, this blew up in a hurry, but you might note it resulted from that singular line you included in your post, which triggered this discussion. In general, it's best not to imply other people are getting things handed to them while you're stuck in the ditches working. Believe me, I know you didn't mean it that way, but that's really the way it could come off, and it kind of feeds into a lot of stereotypes people carry around on campus. See below:

switcher3365 said:
I am black, and I finished my undergrad almost two years ago from an in-state university with $23,000 in student loans and only got $500 for being black, so we're not all floating around campuses for free. (A few people would say things like that when I was in school).

For minority students, the majority of whom won't receive a dime more than you will--ever--in minority-based scholarships, it just makes things tougher to have people walking around implying they're getting free money simply because of the colors of their skin, and that things are a little easier for them when it comes to money because they got in on supersecret scholarships no one else had access to. That's the kind of stuff that phrasing feeds into, which particularly sucks since it isn't true. Okay, enough of this from me.

Thank you. This is the kind of perspective that I was looking for. As I stated in my initial concerns, I had originally taken for granted that I would be getting a MBP, but I have come to question that because a desktop may be better suited. I will still be a student and space and portability are both still commodities, thus I am seeking some guidance on what the best solution is for a compromise between price, functionality, and usability.

As someone above me said, it sounds like you really want a Mac (and a laptop at that), even though most folks are saying go with a Thinkpad (or a desktop). It really depends on whether you're willing to pay more for the privilege of using OS X. If so, get an MB/P. If not, save the cash and get a Thinkpad. My two cents!
 
It wont be hard to just remove Vista... which is the first step anyone should EVER do buying a computer if Vista is on it >_<

Hahaha. thank you. Yes, I would be removing vista as I would rather be stuck with XP anyway. It was just a price consideration that made getting it without the OS favorable.
 
i think this is a clear choice. The only reason to get a Mac is OS X, and you've already stated that you dont care for/want it. Without OS X a Mac is just like any other pc..

(besides the style :eek:)
 
To the original poster, Im in a similar situation as you and heres what I did:

I am going to school for computer science with a focus in math and programming (exciting huh! :p ) I too had no need for fancy graphics and things (even though I enjoy photoshop in my space time)

The reason I got a mac was because:

1. OSX does not have the countless problems vista has (file transfer speeds, constant freeze ups, memory detection, etc). I cant have those type of errors for the work I do.

File transfer speeds are fixed in SP1. I don't know of these "constant freeze ups" you get, perhaps it's due to a bad setup.

2. Macs come with everything I need pre-installed or at least available on disk. (an IDE for example). Windows comes with lots of junk you don't need (free trial of AOL!). I dont want to sound like Im bashing windows but that junk is unnecessary.
Windows does NOT come with free AOL trials or any trial software and stuff usually called bloatware. If your computer comes with trial software, go and blame Dell, IBM, HP, ect. They are the people that put that software on there, not MS. A fresh installation of Vista/XP lacks all that crap.

3. I needed a computer that can properly detect the amount of ram it has for the simulations I will be running. (Vista can only detect 3 - 3.5gb, with service pack 1 it will "see" more ram but it cannot utilize it unless you go with a 64 bit vista).

It's not a Vista, XP, or whatever Windows version you want to toss out there issue. It's a 32-bit architectual issue. It's a limitation with ALL 32-bit OSes. I do believe Mac OS X Leopard is 64-bit, hence why that 4 gig limitation is not there. That 4 gig limitation is also not present in 64-bit Vista, which can be installed on a new IBM with a Core 2 Duo processor. So it's really a moot point.

4. OSX just integrates everything so well and from what I used of it its virtually hassle free and I am a lot more productive on them then I am a windows machine. I will still run windows XP Pro on my mac when I get it since a few programs I need are windows only and I do windows programming but everything else will be used in my mac :)

Subjective. Not really much i can say about that since it's a matter of opinion.

wingad, why do you want a Mac? I don't see anywhere where you have stated this. Instead, I see you listing reasons why you shouldn't get a Mac (Price, you don't care about Mac OS X, have no need for any apps that it comes with). If you don't need Mac OS X, then a Macbook Pro doesn't really offer you anything that an IBM will offer you. Sure, a Macbook Pro may look nicer, but it doesn't sound like you're in the position to be frivilous with your money. In Mac OS X, I get great battery life, about 3+ hours without lowering the screen brightness. However, in Vista/XP, I get about 2-2.5 hours, which is probably about the same as you'd get with an IBM.

The Macbook Pro, hardware wise, is really not much different than any other laptop. They use the same Intel processors, same GPUs, same chipsets, same type of RAM. It's the external package that seperates the manufacturers, along with some quality differences, but on a quality scale, IBM and Apple are pretty even. An IBM with comparable specs is just as capable of doing your work as an Apple.

If you have no need for Mac OS X, then you'll likely have no need for a Macbook Pro. If you need Windows, then that's an additional expense for you, unless you have MSDN AA.

I'm not going to outright tell you to get or not get a Mac, as it's your decision. But just from what you've said, it sounds like you really aren't sold on the idea of buying a Mac.
 
I am making yet another 'should I buy the macbook pro' thread (sorry...):

I am starting as a graduate student in a Ph.D. program for Electrical Engineering this fall. I currently own a Gateway laptop that was a high school graduation gift but was actually purchased in December 2004. So it was 6 months old when I got it and knowing my parents it was a closeout model to begin with. Needless to say, I am definitely purchasing a new computer before September. I have been convicting a macbook pro ever since the switch from powerpc cpu's.

What I am not:
* A computer gamer (I play minesweeper and checkers not half life and dragon lord games)
* A graphic designer or movie producer
* A business traveler
* A rich white kid
* An ipod owner
* A prior Mac owner (I've used OS10 some, but never owned a machine that ran it)

What I am:
* A poor white kid (as such I don't get minority based financial assistance when going to school, or any aid really)
* A student
* A knowledgeable computer user
* A WinXP and Linux user

ok, so what I need is a computer that will be able to handle simulations and to do programming on. I am going to be doing classroom work initially, but graduate school is about research. It seems that most people in research and electrical engineering keep a macbook pro. Linux machines are also popular.

I have for a while just assumed that I was going to get a 15" macbook pro, but I am beginning to question that. A couple concerns:

1) The price. I've read about Thinkpad being an acceptable alternative. Remember I dont care about OS10, I've never used it, so the software doesn't justify the price. How 'bout iLife? doesn't interest me, or at least I have no reason to be interested in it yet.

2) Do I even need a laptop? I've always just assumed laptop, is a desktop really a better computer?

Reasons I do want it:

* It has the power to get the job done
* Everyone else has it. Not to fit in, but if everyone has one, there must be a good reason right?
* Performance, battery life, solid build, compact and light, the little features (back lit keyboard, etc...)
* It is pretty

I am looking for some comments on my need for this computer. All of the threads that I read are about graphic artists and related professionals / students or video gamers. I am a natural sciences student with only a passive interest in those things, so is the macbook pro still for me?

Also with these purchases is the never ending and perpetually annoying 'buy it now or wait' questions. I think there is no question that I will be waiting until either the next revision or August comes and it is time for school to start. I am wondering why though, that people don't seem to stress that the new chipset is going to include support for DDR3? My current laptop uses DDR RAM and it is quite a limitation as everywhere it is DDR2 that is being sold. I cannot upgrade my memory unless I want to add 512MB for over 100$ . I would hate to buy DDR2 right when that was to be obsolete and get stuck in the same situation again. Is DDR3 not that great of an addition or why is it that almost no one sites this as a selling point for the Montevina. Also most critics point to the fact that Montevina will only offer minor performance increases, totally neglecting any increased hardware support except maybe WiMax.

It seems to me that you really have no need to upgrade, but if you want to then you have already made up your mind.
 
Ok, I am sorry that I miscommunicated. All I wanted was to say that my situation shouldnt be looked upon as thought there was potential for more money to pay for this thing so as to eliminate posts telling me about the benefits of applying for scholarships to help pay for it. And I did comment about other funding than just minority funding in my original post so as to not start "implying the majority of all financial assistance was geared toward minority students." Lastly, I didnt make "big statements" about minority funding. I made one statement, I said that I don't get any. That was all. Most all of your arguments are flawed. It is probably because this has gone on too long, though, and you are simply forgetting what we are arguing about. So I will agree to disagree and this should just end.

As someone above me said, it sounds like you really want a Mac (and a laptop at that), even though most folks are saying go with a Thinkpad (or a desktop). It really depends on whether you're willing to pay more for the privilege of using OS X. If so, get an MB/P. If not, save the cash and get a Thinkpad. My two cents!

as for this comment, you are completely wrong. See the above post in reply to the post you referenced.

I only wanted a mbp because I was under the delusion that 'they are the best' but from what I have gathered they are not the best for me. Again, I have never indicated that I "really want a Mac." My original post showed my predisposition towards them, but since it has been nothing but refuting the greatness of the software. That is, saying that I dont care about the software that I am not going to use, in much the same way that no one uses AOL like was posted before.
 
File transfer speeds are fixed in SP1. I don't know of these "constant freeze ups" you get, perhaps it's due to a bad setup.

I cant agree with the file transfer speeds being fixed as all but 3 machines I tested them on (and I have plenty to test on) have the exact same slow speed. (However the speed of deleting files seems to have improved on all machines, a huge step in the right direction) This is out of the machines that are able to get the SP1, not all machines can download SP1 and some cant even get regular updates. This isnt just on one machine its on many many machines.

Windows does NOT come with free AOL trials or any trial software and stuff usually called bloatware. If your computer comes with trial software, go and blame Dell, IBM, HP, ect. They are the people that put that software on there, not MS. A fresh installation of Vista/XP lacks all that crap.

You are correct on that however the average user is going to be buying a computer from a big name company and therefore will get that type of software on the computer.

It's not a Vista, XP, or whatever Windows version you want to toss out there issue. It's a 32-bit architectual issue. It's a limitation with ALL 32-bit OSes. I do believe Mac OS X Leopard is 64-bit, hence why that 4 gig limitation is not there. That 4 gig limitation is also not present in 64-bit Vista, which can be installed on a new IBM with a Core 2 Duo processor. So it's really a moot point.

I thought Mac OS was 32bit so I didn't realize there was an architectual limit, my bad. Although I am still a bit skeptical on how this limitation works as some computers (the one beside me) sees 3 gb, and other computers (the one behind me) sees 3.5 gb. Not to mention after service pack 1, the computer will "see" the true amount of memory however they cannot utilize it.
 
wingad, why do you want a Mac? I don't see anywhere where you have stated this. Instead, I see you listing reasons why you shouldn't get a Mac (Price, you don't care about Mac OS X, have no need for any apps that it comes with). If you don't need Mac OS X, then a Macbook Pro doesn't really offer you anything that an IBM will offer you. Sure, a Macbook Pro may look nicer, but it doesn't sound like you're in the position to be frivilous with your money. In Mac OS X, I get great battery life, about 3+ hours without lowering the screen brightness. However, in Vista/XP, I get about 2-2.5 hours, which is probably about the same as you'd get with an IBM.

The Macbook Pro, hardware wise, is really not much different than any other laptop. They use the same Intel processors, same GPUs, same chipsets, same type of RAM. It's the external package that seperates the manufacturers, along with some quality differences, but on a quality scale, IBM and Apple are pretty even. An IBM with comparable specs is just as capable of doing your work as an Apple.

If you have no need for Mac OS X, then you'll likely have no need for a Macbook Pro. If you need Windows, then that's an additional expense for you, unless you have MSDN AA.

I'm not going to outright tell you to get or not get a Mac, as it's your decision. But just from what you've said, it sounds like you really aren't sold on the idea of buying a Mac.

First thank you for having read enough to see that I am favoring the Mac which some have taken from nowhere to make posts about. I do have MSDNAA and also everything already installed on virtual HD's so there will be no software costs associated with the move.

The reason I originally was pursuing a mac is that I had been told about how great a computer it was. It is also very popular among researchers, so I just assumed it was the right choice, then i started looking into it and had doubts which landed me here.

It seems to me that you really have no need to upgrade, but if you want to then you have already made up your mind.

I am currently running a computer that has less than a half gig of RAM and mobile processor that is scaled to run at less than a GHz even though I know it can run at over 2GHz but I don't know how to force it from being used in power save mode (that is a whole different thread).

Basically, why is it that I don't need to upgrade? Do i have some gem and I don't realize it?
 
However I have seen the new T61s and the left side of the screen bezel is wider than the right?

They've (thinkpads) been like that since the T41. Oh and if you pay $23 more you can get a thinkpad with XP. Why remove an OS you don't want? You'll still get bloat I'm sure though.

and no, you can not get them sans OS.
 
In my opinion it really does sound like all you want is a mac because everyone else has it. I myself bought my mac for OS X and absolutely love it for that reason. The macbook pro itself is a great laptop but for working in windows its not perfect. Again your much better off getting a dedicated windows laptop for your needs. If you want something as pretty as a mac with an education discount, I do believe alienware has a new 15 inch laptop that is full aluminum and comes with the exact same specs as the macbook pro including backlit keyboard. It's actually the first windows laptop I'v considered buying since going mac. It is also upgradable by BTO and can have up to a 8800 GTX M graphics card with blue ray and the works and every conceiveable card reader. It's very nice albeit SLIGHTY thinker but not much. It's actually thin compared to other windows laptops as well.

http://www.alienware.com/product_de...Code=PC-LT-AREA51M15X-AI1&SubCode=SKU-DEFAULT
 
I guess I'm dumb sorry... if software is not a problem, then listen to EVERYONE UP THERE WHOS BEEN SAYING "Get thinkpad then, if software is not a problem" You can obviously live with windows still... only God knows how. But, if it makes you happy, thats good :)

Mac for software
ThinkPad for Windows and a few saved bucks

This is just getting dumb. Who said he had to live to Windows. He can install Linux!

What's wrong with getting freakin' Windows. Half the **** out there needs it anyways. If anything, OS X has a crap load of problems; just everyone's either too fed up with Windows to care or they a bunch of headless fanboys. JEESUS!
 
This is just getting dumb. Who said he had to live to Windows. He can install Linux!

What's wrong with getting freakin' Windows. Half the **** out there needs it anyways. If anything, OS X has a crap load of problems; just everyone's either too fed up with Windows to care or they a bunch of headless fanboys. JEESUS!

I'll go with headless fanboy. Apple has secretly planted a chip in my brain ever since I bought my iPod. Its great technology... it jumps from the iPod the first night while you are sleeping and you don't even realize it. It blinds you from all of Apple's issues and makes them appear to be on their competitor's products. True story. anyone else have this experience?
 
1) The price. I've read about Thinkpad being an acceptable alternative. Remember I dont care about OS10, I've never used it, so the software doesn't justify the price. How 'bout iLife? doesn't interest me, or at least I have no reason to be interested in it yet.

I'm not sure how you can say the the OS or the software is not important to you. That's like saying I'm going to buy a car and I don't care about it's engine, performance and what kind of fuel economy, reliability, safety or what the interior is like.

Do you care about stability? Windows WILL crash a lot more often than Mac.
Do you care about viruses, spyware? Windows is attacked a LOT more and is less secure of an OS than Mac.
Do you care about maintenance? In Windows, you will have to figure out anti-virus, anti-spyware, anti adware, etc. You may need a whole suit of programs to keep your computer clean and running properly. You will not have to deal with much on a Mac.
Do you care about performance and speed? Do you like waiting for minutes for things to load up or would you like for them to load up in seconds? How about over time? Windows is slow to start with (much slower than Mac). To make matters worse, windows is prone to getting 'bloated' very fast. In a few short months, your super powerful windows machine will be brought to it's knees and crawling, thanks to Windows. Again, you won't see this on a Mac.

This is just the surface. Once you become familiar with Macs, things are so seamless, easy and intuitive. Remember that Apple has always been the intuitive one and Windows has always been a poor copy of Mac.

Maybe you should care about iLife. Everyone takes pictures, everyone listens to music. Imagine putting pictures up on the web in seconds. Imagine creating a website like how you create a word document and then just hit 'Publish'. Imagine dragging and dropping pictures from Safari right into your email or right into your webpage. There are so many things I can't even begine to type them here. Same thing with movies and DVDs. The possibilites are limitless. You wouldn't know where to begin all this on a Windows PC. It's all too confusing and difficult.

Anyways, I think what I am trying to make you realize is that how can you not care about all of these things, especiually since you are going for a technical degree? By the way I am an Electrical Engineer :)

Kan-O-Z
 
Another thing I want to point out is that people make Apple sound like they are way way overpriced where in reality they are not.

Spec out a laptop with this.
2.4GHZ Core 2 Duo
2GB Ram
200GB HD
Wireless N
BlueTooth
256VRAM 8600GT Video
LED Display
Firewire 800
Dual Layer DVD/CD 8X Burner
Built in Camera
ExpressCard Slot
Nifty things like backlit keyboard and Remote and of course the new multitouch.

What you will find is that some of these features aren't even available on other laptops. If they are and you spec out a Thinkpad or Dell pound for pound what a MBP is, I will bet you it's price will come within $100 of the price of the MBP. For me that's really not enough of a savings to sway me, especially with what I talked about in my last post.

Of course Apple doesnt' have the super cheap laptop that the others may have and if you are looking for super budget, you won't find it at Apple. You shouldn't be looking at super budget since you didn't really like your Gateway.

Kan-O-Z
 
I thought Mac OS was 32bit so I didn't realize there was an architectual limit, my bad. Although I am still a bit skeptical on how this limitation works as some computers (the one beside me) sees 3 gb, and other computers (the one behind me) sees 3.5 gb. Not to mention after service pack 1, the computer will "see" the true amount of memory however they cannot utilize it.

All OSes have Address Space. On 32-bit OSes there is about a total of 4 gigs of Address Space (I think 2^32, which is about 4 gigs). So, your video memory (from your video card), other little bits of memory for each device is scattered about the system, all takes a chunk of that 4 gigs maximum. Back in 1994, this obviously wasn't a problem, but now that memory modules hit this maximum, it's now a problem. So, that vRAM, memory for the sound card, and other little stuff, all detracts from the total RAM that is recognized. It's something all 32-bit OSes have issues with. There are "dirty" ways that have been made to get around this, but they can have issues with programs and drivers.
 
I'm not sure how you can say the the OS or the software is not important to you. That's like saying I'm going to buy a car and I don't care about it's engine, performance and what kind of fuel economy, reliability, safety or what the interior is like.

Do you care about stability? Windows WILL crash a lot more often than Mac.
Do you care about viruses, spyware? Windows is attacked a LOT more and is less secure of an OS than Mac.
Do you care about maintenance? In Windows, you will have to figure out anti-virus, anti-spyware, anti adware, etc. You may need a whole suit of programs to keep your computer clean and running properly. You will not have to deal with much on a Mac.
Do you care about performance and speed? Do you like waiting for minutes for things to load up or would you like for them to load up in seconds? How about over time? Windows is slow to start with (much slower than Mac). To make matters worse, windows is prone to getting 'bloated' very fast. In a few short months, your super powerful windows machine will be brought to it's knees and crawling, thanks to Windows. Again, you won't see this on a Mac.

This is just the surface. Once you become familiar with Macs, things are so seamless, easy and intuitive. Remember that Apple has always been the intuitive one and Windows has always been a poor copy of Mac.

Maybe you should care about iLife. Everyone takes pictures, everyone listens to music. Imagine putting pictures up on the web in seconds. Imagine creating a website like how you create a word document and then just hit 'Publish'. Imagine dragging and dropping pictures from Safari right into your email or right into your webpage. There are so many things I can't even begine to type them here. Same thing with movies and DVDs. The possibilites are limitless. You wouldn't know where to begin all this on a Windows PC. It's all too confusing and difficult.

Anyways, I think what I am trying to make you realize is that how can you not care about all of these things, especiually since you are going for a technical degree? By the way I am an Electrical Engineer :)

Kan-O-Z

You are an electrical engineer, yet you have not heard of linux? Where did you go? Seriously, where because maybe I could get a job there helping with their technology department and not even have to go to grad school.

but yeah, I don't care about pictures and sending emails with pictures. I know how to do what I want to do with pictures and emails. I don't need it to be idiot proof.
 
You are an electrical engineer, yet you have not heard of linux? Where did you go? Seriously, where because maybe I could get a job there helping with their technology department and not even have to go to grad school.

but yeah, I don't care about pictures and sending emails with pictures. I know how to do what I want to do with pictures and emails. I don't need it to be idiot proof.

Ok so my argument above was all Windows related. Here is what I have to say about Linux:

Linux is not my cup of tea, at least not for using it on a daily basis. It's interface is NO Mac OS. It's not about being idiot proof for me. Sure I can make web pages by hand or use some tool to make it....but why? My time is precious. I don't want to spend any more time than necessary and I don't need any more headaches than necessary. Even researching the 'right' tool is kind of annoying for me. If the computer comes with it all, makes it stress free, gets the job done, and even looks pretty while doing it (added bonus), then that's the computer for me :)

So yes Mac OS may not be for you and maybe you want to use Linux for everything. Maybe you don't need to deal with pictures, videos or music. Nothing wrong with that. I do and I just feel that I can get more done, quicker and faster with less hassle on a Mac. Don't forget a Mac is Unix/BSD underneath and you can pop open that unix shell window any time of the day that you like :)

Even if you don't do stuff like pictures there is still tons of stuff that is way easier on a Mac than Linux. Have you seen demos for time machine? It's not a new concept and can be done on other platforms but guess what....you don't need a frikin IT professional to do stuff. If your computer HD dies and you lose all your data and you get another drive and you want an image from any date(yesterday, last week or last month), it's only a few clicks on a mac. If you lose a file and want to search your harddrive on your mac exactly 3 weeks ago, you can do searches back in time, even view the file(or play a movie if that's what the file is right in the backup) and once you have got it, you can pull it right back from a previous backup right on to your desktop....and guess how long this takes....a few clicks and about a minute. Do that in Linux without spending the whole weekend, I just wanna see that. ;) Oh right, first you'll have to find a very intricate incremental backup system that will let you do searches of your images back in time and even open up files. Good luck.

Time is precious. I don't have time to waste fiddling around with Linux or Windows. I am a technical person and am more than capable of writing scripts, HTML, ASP, and use miscellaneous tools to create a website. I am more than capable of administering a computer too. But here's the thing. If it takes more than an hour, I'm not spending my precious weekend doing it. I never had a real website until the mac. I find myself doing things I would have never done simply because it's so easy and quick. Just my 2 cents...

By the way I am an EE and a software developer. I went to PSU - Main Campus(Happy Valley). I wish I would have majored in Computer Engineering or Computer Science if I had to do it over again. EE is great but there are a lot more jobs out there for Computer Engineering/Computer Science. I feel like I didn't know enough about computers or software when I got out.

By the way watch this leopard demo when you get a chance. It never hurts to be more educated and it'll demo a lot of the nifty things I am talking about above:
http://www.apple.com/findouthow/guidedtours/leopard.html

Kan-O-Z
 
Another thing I want to point out is that people make Apple sound like they are way way overpriced where in reality they are not.
...
What you will find is that some of these features aren't even available on other laptops. If they are and you spec out a Thinkpad or Dell pound for pound what a MBP is, I will bet you it's price will come within $100 of the price of the MBP. For me that's really not enough of a savings to sway me, especially with what I talked about in my last post.

Of course Apple doesnt' have the super cheap laptop that the others may have and if you are looking for super budget, you won't find it at Apple. You shouldn't be looking at super budget since you didn't really like your Gateway.

Kan-O-Z

I'd like to add to that is people should stop comparing pimped out budget notebooks to the Macbook Pro. This is a prosumer computer so don't compare budget/mainstream to it. It's like comparing a Volkswagen Passat with Sat-Nav, HD Radio, leather seats, iPod integration, etc to a Mercedes S550 with the same stuff. It's not the same. When you do a comparison you have use Audi, which is in the same class as the Mercedes.

Same thing with the computers. You have to use Dell Precision to compare to the MBP. Try configuring a Precision and you will notice it's not cheap either. Configure a Lenovo T61p (not the non-p version) and get the same configuration and it won't be cheap either.

MBP are not expensive. They are prosumer computers and people should stop treating them like overprice budget/mainstream machines when they're not. Going back the car analogy: Would you buy a Mercedes S550 when you're looking for something in the lines of the a Honda?
 
.Apple's support -apple store (not indian tech support)
.High quality parts
.Can run the most easy to use os plus any version of windows if you want

you might want to take "high quality parts" out of consideration, for the macbook at least. Horrid materials to say the least.
 
Ok so my argument above was all Windows related. Here is what I have to say about Linux:

...

Even if you don't do stuff like pictures there is still tons of stuff that is way easier on a Mac than Linux. Have you seen demos for time machine? It's not a new concept and can be done on other platforms but guess what....you don't need a frikin IT professional to do stuff. If your computer HD dies and you lose all your data and you get another drive and you want an image from any date(yesterday, last week or last month), it's only a few clicks on a mac. If you lose a file and want to search your harddrive on your mac exactly 3 weeks ago, you can do searches back in time, even view the file(or play a movie if that's what the file is right in the backup) and once you have got it, you can pull it right back from a previous backup right on to your desktop....and guess how long this takes....a few clicks and about a minute. Do that in Linux without spending the whole weekend, I just wanna see that. ;) Oh right, first you'll have to find a very intricate incremental backup system that will let you do searches of your images back in time and even open up files. Good luck.

...


Time machine is essentially a software offering from VMware, who's software is written for windows, linux and mac. It revolves around virtual machines however and not on the core operating system like time machine does. I don't know this for sure, but from the striking similarities, I would suspect that Apple either developed time machine with the developers from VMware or they are licensing from them. I may be completely wrong. I do use virtual machines for my personal computing (web, pictures, software), but this is actually a strength of OS10 in that it offers a very nice integration with VMware fusion, from what I've seen.


Thanks for the rest of the advice. I do agree that OS10 looks very nice and I am sure that I would be very happy with it. I am just wondering, though, if it is justified to purchase as I don't need, nor would likely use, a lot of the software (iLife, etc...). I would get by just fine with just great hardware, because I can get or already have all of the software I need as a student. Moreover, I already have the systems built in virtual machines that I would be using most of the time anyways. I just need more power to run these machines faster and to run the simulations better (which will be run under a unvirtualized OS)
 
I'm not sure you can compare time machine to vmware. Time machine does not allow you to run virtual machine instances. On the Mac VMWare Fusion or Parallels does though. Time machine is a very slick gui based backup software.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.