The original article in Bloomberg had "Chinese national" which is a normal way to identify someone and not racist. It's no different, IMHO, when someone is identified as Canadian, German, etc. The news is simply stating a fact as part of their reporting.
MR changed national to man instead of leaving it as Bloomberg did.
The original article in Bloomberg had "Chinese national" which is a normal way to identify someone and not racist. It's no different, IMHO, when someone is identified as Canadian, German, etc. The news is simply stating a fact as part of their reporting.
MR changed national to man instead of leaving it as Bloomberg did.
A different view that I welcome.
Except is China as well culturally and ethnically diverse as Canada? Is German as such to Canada? But I guess you’re right.
[doublepost=1558756379][/doublepost]
His status as a Chinese national (which means he's here on a student visa) is material to his acquisition of the fraudulent phones, and his reselling of them back into the Chinese market.
His article here did not say chinese national just a Chinese man.