Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Half you cats making fun on this guy actually use Facebook. I think it's stupid. But he's smart for getting all of you to use something you claim to dislike.

I never signed up for Facebook and every person I know who did are sick of it and hardly ever use it ... ever hear the saying "Jump the Shark"

the time is coming soon where the number of people quitting Facebook will out-number the people joining.
 
For what it's worth - I have no respect for Zuckerberg at all - he stole an idea and made billions off of it and still can't put together 2 cohesive sentences. Only goes to show that money doesn't mean diddly, he's still an idiot. Kinda ironic that a guy who created the no.1 social network has no social skills at all.
Then again, Facebook is meant for people to avoid actual physical contact when socializing.

However - I don't get all the fuss about 'stealing information' and 'privacy breaches'. You put it there! It's not like facebook hacked into God knows what and stole it from you, you offered it to them on their own website.

Also, if that information incriminates you or exposes to you any danger, then why were you putting it there in the first place? I have an account because I have friends all over the world and being in contact with them is easiest through facebook. International text messaging I can't afford really, plus phone numbers and emails change all the time so it's hard to keep up. Not everyone has an iPhone so iMessage is limited. There are some services like Whatsapp that are crossplatform, but again - not everyone has a smartphone.

On my account I have 1 profile picture just so people can see that it's me, my wall is turned off, I don't comment/tag/like stuff so I'm not an active user. The only feature I really use is [Private] Messages.

It's not like Google isn't monitoring your Gmail, Docs, G+ account etc. And there are many more examples (Apple tracking iPhone users through GPS fiasco?)


Ease up people!
 
Last edited:
Well, like I said, it's become sort of a necessary evil that practically holds a monopoly on social networking supersites.

Social network sites always have a monopoly. Friendster was one, then MySpace, then Facebook. That's how it works. There's always going to be one huge social network. Because people want to use one, not two or more.
 
No. I think many like yourself were not understanding what Steve Job was doing 10 years ago. You thought it was strange and you were very scared. Is same thing with Mark Zuckerberg. But eventually you will understand and be writing on FacebookRumors. Ha. Maybe not but very close. Facebook will be in everything. Is good for information transfer and future. Time to move from past.

And that is the scary part of it ... Once I log off from FB I want not to see my avatar in news pages I'm reading and asking me for comments. That sniffing goes too far. I have no problem with all the crap I write in FB direct. That can be used by everyone and my responsibility. But outside FB I want to be alone.

And comparing a company like Apple actually doing development and production of goods is different from just ad-driven Internet companies like FB. One little needle and the bubble is gone.
Apple survived with good ideas, products etc.
 
And that is the scary part of it ... Once I log off from FB I want not to see my avatar in news pages I'm reading and asking me for comments. That sniffing goes too far. I have no problem with all the crap I write in FB direct. That can be used by everyone and my responsibility. But outside FB I want to be alone.

And comparing a company like Apple actually doing development and production of goods is different from just ad-driven Internet companies like FB. One little needle and the bubble is gone.
Apple survived with good ideas, products etc.

All free sites are ad driven. That's how they get the money.
 
This sounds incredibly bitter and mean-spirited. First of all, I'm not sure why you think being inarticulate on TV equals having poor social skills. Lots of people are bad with public speaking, I can't imagine you'd be too much better on national TV without any training.

Second of all, your assumption that Facebook is for anti-social shut-ins is just bizarre, what world are you living in? Facebook has one of largest, most broad audiences of any web site.

If he's bad at public speaking then why did he go on air? Did somebody force him to do so? Was somebody pointing a gun at his head? Nope.

He just wants to be in the public eye even though with every appearance he is becoming more and more of a laughing stock. Steve Jobs heir my ass.

I never said I'd do a better job at public speaking and this isn't about me. It's about a young, quasi-genius who won't spend some money on a quality PR team and some public speaking training. Something that is expected of a quality company and it's CEO. And given the subject at hand, the late Steve Jobs (certainly one of Silicon Valley's giants), I'd especially like to see him utter 2-3 normal sentences of an anecdote. But this extends further on - he couldn't be coherent to save his life. It's not babbling about him, it's the truth and there are tens of other forumers saying the same thing.

My assumption was correct, your interpretation of my assumption was wrong. I did not say FB was for bizarro social shut-ins ONLY, I meant that it is turning us into social bizarros, with people making fake friends on facebook, collecting connections like they'll increase your income or whatnot, stalking people by looking at their photos all day.
 
Great idea. Follow-thru. Squashing all those who get in the way. Oh yeah, he's also far from being an idiot. Some of the most brilliant people are far from being articulate.

John Carmack. I doubt many here would argue against the man's genius but when he used to post updates about his progress on a given game, it showed all the grammatical prowess of a 10-year-old. Contrary to what any would-be grammar Nazis believe, you can be a brilliant person without masterful grammar skills.
 
I HATE when the media compares Suckerberg to Jobs. Not even close. One was a business genius, the other is a lucky fool who rode the social media wave on a surfboard engineered by many before him. FAIL.

Did I mention that I hate Mark Zuckerberg?
 
I HATE when the media compares Suckerberg to Jobs. Not even close. One was a business genius, the other is a lucky fool who rode the social media wave on a surfboard engineered by many before him. FAIL.

Did I mention that I hate Mark Zuckerberg?

How was Mark lucky? They are both brilliant at what they did. Why the hate?

If you meant he did it at the right place and the right time, then the same can be said about Steve Jobs.
 
How was Mark lucky? They are both brilliant at what they did. Why the hate?

If you meant he did it at the right place and the right time, then the same can be said about Steve Jobs.

But Steve's genuinely hip, he's got very good taste and charisma, none of which characteristics M.Z. has.
 
I'll just leave this here.
 

Attachments

  • facebook_evil.jpg
    facebook_evil.jpg
    46.4 KB · Views: 88
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.