Re: Re: Worldwide Service
Originally posted by Stella
Steve at the opening presentation on Monday could have said something like - "no international service yet, sorry, but we are committed to rolling it out internationally, and we are working on it". And could have given some predictive dates (I know apple doesn't do this normally).
Some sort of statement would have sufficed. But they leave us up in the air. Based upon their treatment of international users, people (US?) wonder why we are getting bitter and twisted!
But they can't speculate on things that aren't cold hard facts. This is a publicly held company with shareholders, publicly traded on a stock floor. If the company - and it doesn't matter which company - makes a claim that they're new product will go worldwide on day X, then turns around and dumps it's engagement in the stocks the day before X without delivering the product on said date X, then they've just committed securities fraud. And the SEC would like to have a little chat with them. That's why Apple, and most other public companies have a "don't comment on rumors/speculations" policy.
Steve can't say that it will go international May 5 (or whatever) - because if he does, and there's an unseen glitch and it doesn't roll until May 6, he's going to have a whole lot of angry shareholders to answer to, not to mention the
hoards of upset international buyers such as our friends here across the pond. This is sticky, legal, nasty stuff.
They'd really like your money. Really.
And the sherlock thing is a combination of the availability of the SDK and content providers, often having censorship issues with multiple different governments in such a small area. It wouldn't be worth the effort for Apple to make (for instance) a traffic report channel for London, if the Labor Party decided to not allow public dissemination of the information about traffic flow. Purely an example - I have no real idea of what goes on as far as censorship/content provision.
And I don't have a clue about the iphoto thing either, but it may have something to do with a faliure to procure a commercial printing service in the EU or eastern hemisphere that could economically and timely deliver the books to the masses that ordered them. We are talking about the bound books, right? If not, please PM and explain...
*edited for spelling