I've been a long time Apple laptop user who currently owns a circa 2011 MBP (see signature) with 1GB dedicated graphics. As I am a gamer, this has always been important to me and the dedicated graphics has always been a must for this task if the discussion is about running something more demanding than find-the-object games.
I see in the newly announced lineup of MBPs that only the top of the line MBP includes dedicated graphics. I know they continue to make strides in integrated graphics and am anxiously awaiting the benchmark comparisons between the 15" 2.0 and the 15" 2.3 models. I'm not an expert on integrated graphics although I do know in the past they have not been sufficient to run the AAA games out there.
I'm wondering what kind of performance you'd get out of the 2.0GHz version with 16GB RAM on it?
What kind of limits does integrated graphics have when it comes to tapping RAM for its own personal use? Can integrated graphics grab 2GB RAM?
This CNET Article- Dissecting Intel's Top Graphics in Apple's 15" MBP sheds a little light on the subject.
Just noticed this thread discussing the same issues. :-\
I see in the newly announced lineup of MBPs that only the top of the line MBP includes dedicated graphics. I know they continue to make strides in integrated graphics and am anxiously awaiting the benchmark comparisons between the 15" 2.0 and the 15" 2.3 models. I'm not an expert on integrated graphics although I do know in the past they have not been sufficient to run the AAA games out there.
I'm wondering what kind of performance you'd get out of the 2.0GHz version with 16GB RAM on it?
What kind of limits does integrated graphics have when it comes to tapping RAM for its own personal use? Can integrated graphics grab 2GB RAM?
This CNET Article- Dissecting Intel's Top Graphics in Apple's 15" MBP sheds a little light on the subject.
Just noticed this thread discussing the same issues. :-\
Last edited: