Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So 75% of customers DO NOT use credit cards. So these GREEDY companies are creating a new standard for the 25% of customers who do use credit cards? Really? Greedy much? I thought it was the other way around, and credit card fees were killing these guys. But because you are too greedy to pay CC fees for 25% of your customers, you want to disrupt everyone else?

FAIL well.
 
Ummm....

not exactly sure what your point is or how it's explaining to me how bank loans or credit cards actually work..
from what i said, it doesn't matter if the payment happens immediately or in a year.
?


it's a fractional reserve system:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_reserve_banking

and yes, what you said is true (Banks are required to keep a certain percentage of their holdings in cash in order to pay for withdraws you make against your accounts)..
but what percentage are we talking here? further, what percentage is the federal reserve required to have in reserve prior to issuing loans?
(i'll refrain from giving the answers.. i'd rather you or others find them with your own research)

and no, a bank can't go bankrupt via a run.. not anymore.
for one, they don't hold any money, just currency

but two, they're backed/insured by the federal reserve.


hmm.. no. inflation is just an effect or symptom of what i'm talking about.

and yes, the money really is being created out of thin air.. if you truly do know how money is created and you're saying 'money' is actually 'something' then please share.. i'm entirely open to learn about where our money comes from and i think everybody else should be too..

as far as i can gather so far though, 'money' is our- the general public's- lives.. that is the value


What was that bank called again......? Oh that's right Lehman Brothers. I'm pretty sure they went bankrupt. If you don't believe me you can go look up some of there employees that got laid off and ask them. It says you live in New York City so they shouldn't be too hard to find.

The long and the short is that In the case of credit cards the moment of payment is a simple IOU from the bank. The transaction is made using one of the major credit networks (most of the time) where a fee based on the size of the transaction is applied to the transaction it self. Rather then having money sent all over the place each time some one swipes their card or buys something on line the banks will settle up with merchants on regular cycles. The process would be similar to how you work all week and then get paid rather then getting a check every minute as you work during the day.

Bank to bank gets more complicated because (and I'm oversimplifying here) you have two major types of banks folks talk about. Investment banks and Commercial banks. Investment banks manage transactions between major clients or invest their own money to increase capital. Most all banks are exposed financially to other banks on a day to day basis. Short-term loans are used interbank to actually pay for day to day bank activity. As far as i know all trades and short term loans are settled up at the end of the day or in a very short time. The money is real but it doesn't really end up being transferred until the end of the day. Banks can make and loose crap loads of money over the course of the day and most of the time (for the bank at least) the end of the day is all that matters.

Commercial banks are different because they hold deposits for regular Joe's and Sarah's like you and me. There are much more strict regulations as to what commercial banks can do with the deposited money. A previous poster did excellent job explaining that. Now when commercial banks begin to fail the FDIC will swoop in and take them into receivership. The FDIC is partly paid for by these commercial banks. It's sort of a fee that's charged to banks for the FDIC to watch over them. So when the bank fails they're taken into receivership and the FDIC will as quickly as possible find a buyer for the failing bank and sell the bank to that buyer for next to nothing. We're talking a bank who lets say stock price was $35 one day could be sold by the FDIC the next day for say $1 to another company if it was put into receivership. The folks who have the bank accounts and their money in the bank don't see anything happen but the shareholders value is totally wiped out. It protects the depositors and is a big FU to the folks who took the risk of investing.

By the way banks can totally fail if there is a run. Banks need cash on hand to use as a cushion between the payments coming in and the payments going out. If confidence in a bank is lost just like with Lehman Brothers investors will pull their money and investors will dump the stock. This causes a rapid reduction and available capital which limits or prohibits the banks ability to settle their trades. When this happens the bank becomes insolvent. If this happens to an investment bank it's your on your own but if this happens to a commercial bank that's part of the FDIC the receivership path is taken

Don't get me wrong extraordinary circumstances were taken in 2008. That event certainly set some unsettling precedences. TARP, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Bear Stearns just to name a few.

The federal reserve is a totally different animal. The Federal Reserve Banks (yes there are a number of them) aren't technically part of the US government. It's kind of a strange quasipublic private ordeal but be sure you don't ever tell a federal reserve bank employee that they're part of the government. I did once and i got torn a new one :p. Long story short is that the Federal Reserve Banks work with regional banks among other things to keep the financial markets calm and stable. To stop things like the panic of 1906 and 2007-08.

Anyway I'm a little "modern jackass" here but you get the idea. Money can be created out of nowhere by the Fed (because we are off the gold standard and the value of money is based on trust) but creating huge amounts of money out of nowhere for no reason leads to rapid inflation. Inflation it self is a good thing for economies because it puts pressure on consumers to purchase something before the price goes up. witch brings money back into the system. Rapid inflation IE Germany post WWI for reference is no Bueno. In the case of deflation the cost of goods "seems" to go down so (why would i buy today if it's cheeper tomorrow) Money doesn't flow and liquidity evaporates. With no or little liquidity the financial system seizes up. The job of the Fed is to make sure that doesn't happen.

Try reading "too big to fail" good book :)
 
Most customers don't use major credit cards?

What is he on drugs or is lying his second nature?

If most people don't use major credit cards, how did so many people sign up to use Apple Pay the first week?
What I don't understand is how they can explain that the major credit cards are not used by the majority of customers? How did those credit cards became "major" in the first place if nobody uses them?
 
Most customers don't use major credit cards?

What is he on drugs or is lying his second nature?

If most people don't use major credit cards, how did so many people sign up to use Apple Pay the first week?

If most people didn't use credit cards, there would be no MCX and CurrentC.
 
What was that bank called again......? Oh that's right Lehman Brothers. I'm pretty sure they went bankrupt. If you don't believe me you can go look up some of there employees that got laid off and ask them. It says you live in New York City so they shouldn't be too hard to find.
oh right. lehman.
they had a plan in place similar to bear stearns (dice it up and sell off cheap).. england was to be responsible for 1/2 of this deal and they backed out last minute (well, the whole thing was last minute)..
regardlss, yes you're right.. a large bank can go bankrupt.. thanks for the reminder.

The long and the short is that In the case of credit cards the moment of payment is a simple IOU from the bank. The transaction is made using one of the major credit networks (most of the time) where a fee based on the size of the transaction is applied to the transaction it self. Rather then having money sent all over the place each time some one swipes their card or buys something on line the banks will settle up with merchants on regular cycles. The process would be similar to how you work all week and then get paid rather then getting a check every minute as you work during the day.

Bank to bank gets more complicated because (and I'm oversimplifying here) you have two major types of banks folks talk about. Investment banks and Commercial banks. Investment banks manage transactions between major clients or invest their own money to increase capital. Most all banks are exposed financially to other banks on a day to day basis. Short-term loans are used interbank to actually pay for day to day bank activity. As far as i know all trades and short term loans are settled up at the end of the day or in a very short time. The money is real but it doesn't really end up being transferred until the end of the day. Banks can make and loose crap loads of money over the course of the day and most of the time (for the bank at least) the end of the day is all that matters.
i'm not sure why this timing of payments has anything to do with what i said.. (krevnik also responded to me similarly).. what's the significance of "Banks can make and loose crap loads of money over the course of the day and most of the time (for the bank at least) the end of the day is all that matters.".. what's the connection i'm supposed to be getting from the paycheck analogy?

Commercial banks are different because they hold deposits for regular Joe's and Sarah's like you and me. There are much more strict regulations as to what commercial banks can do with the deposited money. A previous poster did excellent job explaining that.

excellent? where? explained what again?


By the way banks can totally fail if there is a run.
again, you're right.. lehman bros failed.
that is one example but on the other hand, i see massive bank bailouts much more often or based around a significantly greater amount of $.

Anyway I'm a little "modern jackass" here but you get the idea. Money can be created out of nowhere by the Fed

right.. the fed creates money out of then air.. this money then goes into the banks and through loans/fractional reserve system, the money is then expanded.. the fed's fraudulent money is multiplied by the banks.

----------

see if you find fault in the way this guy outlines the creation of money

 
this whole MCX suddenly became a hot topic cult. it is more or less like region or politics.
MCX is famous over night which was unknown to many previously.
how so?
 
this whole MCX suddenly became a hot topic cult. it is more or less like region or politics.
MCX is famous over night which was unknown to many previously.
how so?

More like infamous. Because of the actions of 2 of its member retailers, CVS and Rite Aid, in turning off NFC despite the fact that it was working great for mobile payments. thereby showing disrespect for consumers. This was traced to MCX.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if most Walmart shoppers didn't use credit cards but Lowes and even Target, I'm skeptical.

Oh, Walmart shoppers use credit cards all right. Remember, this whole thing was basically started by Walmart because they hate paying the credit card fees.
 
Here's how Rankin describes the checkout process with CurrentC.

After the sale is rung up, and you say you want to pay via mobile, "You pull out the phone, open the app, click pay and a QR code is displayed. She scans it, and you're done. It's like when the QR code is sent to you by the airline and you use it for your boarding pass. It's frictionless."

Are these people on drugs? What's easier - swiping your phone over the credit card machine or CurrentC's 6 step process?

And also, I don't use "major credit cards" everyday... but, I do use debit cards associated with major credit card issuers (Visa/Mastercard), which I think a lot of folks use.
 
Listen guys it's very simple:

1. Download the app
2. Add your checking account number
3. Verify with your bank
4. Everything gets messed up and you need customer service
5. Everything gets fixed the following week.
6. Go back to the store and try again
7. Tell the cashier you want to use "CurrentC"
8. Cashier gets confused because they think you're an idiot, of course the customer is going to use currency...
9. Explain to the cashier that no, "CurrentC" is a new app where you need to have her use that scanner from 1991 to scan your phone from 2014 to reach into your bank account and grab your money.
10. Then you can walk away happy that CVS not only knows you just bought tampons for your wife, but where you bought it, and what your heart rate was when you bought it.


Cmon guys, it's frictionless...

Brilliant, but I would add this:

8. Old lady with checkbook in hand behind you crosses arms in frustration because you are taking too long.
 
How about the lady that watches the cashier ring up her purchase and then only after she tells her the amount she decides to plop down her massive purse on the counter and than proceeds to go through it to find her massive wallet, then looks through the 100s of store cards to find the card associated with the store, and than counts out the cash to pay.
I never understood why she doesn't get out her wallet and store card while the cashier is ringing her up so as soon as the cashier is done she can pay.

Unfortunately, there are quite a few people who can't anticipate what will happen more than 10 seconds into the future. People who can't easily merge onto the highway, people who change lanes after they enter a tunnel or roundabout, people who don't start looking at the fast food menu until they get up to the cashier, etc. I have to wonder how these people survive.
 
Unfortunately, there are quite a few people who can't anticipate what will happen more than 10 seconds into the future. People who can't easily merge onto the highway, people who change lanes after they enter a tunnel or roundabout, people who don't start looking at the fast food menu until they get up to the cashier, etc. I have to wonder how these people survive.

Goldnose got it wrong... They don't set the purse on the counter, they put it on the belt. Then flip out when the belt MOVES like it is supposed too.

While they are digging for the card.... Or 43 cents.

Because at my Target, the counter is high, and they couldn't see into their purse if they tried.

Ugh. 3 more days then I'm done with retail, where I swore I'd never work again. But I'm paid well and it's flexible... But it is time to move on.
 
oh right. lehman.
they had a plan in place similar to bear stearns (dice it up and sell off cheap).. england was to be responsible for 1/2 of this deal and they backed out last minute (well, the whole thing was last minute)..
regardlss, yes you're right.. a large bank can go bankrupt.. thanks for the reminder.


i'm not sure why this timing of payments has anything to do with what i said.. (krevnik also responded to me similarly).. what's the significance of "Banks can make and loose crap loads of money over the course of the day and most of the time (for the bank at least) the end of the day is all that matters.".. what's the connection i'm supposed to be getting from the paycheck analogy?



excellent? where? explained what again?



again, you're right.. lehman bros failed.
that is one example but on the other hand, i see massive bank bailouts much more often or based around a significantly greater amount of $.



right.. the fed creates money out of then air.. this money then goes into the banks and through loans/fractional reserve system, the money is then expanded.. the fed's fraudulent money is multiplied by the banks.

----------

see if you find fault in the way this guy outlines the creation of money

YouTube: video

The issue I had with your post is that you said when you buy something with your credit card the bank creates the money out of nothing. Perhaps this is us talking past one another but public banks IE JPM, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley and so on cannot create money out of nothing.

The explanation I made was to depict that the transaction is real and the bank (or who ever is paying) must send the money accordingly. This money is real money. The further explanation is just to put the whole thing into perspective.

The other poster i spoke of was krevnik who explained how and why commercial banks hold X amount of capital in retention.

Your post also seems to express a difference between currency and money. The two are exactly the same so I was confused.

When you say massive bank bailouts your talking about what happened back in 2008 right? I'm not aware of any other federal capital infusion since those major debacles.

And in your last paragraph you mention money being expanded. This sounds to me like the value of the capital can be changed witch isn't really possible. X can only ever equal X to it self. There was also mention of fraudulent money.

I think what we need to keep in mind is that money isn't anything other then an object that's used to initiate a transaction. The US dollar is literally nothing more then a piece of complicated fraud protected paper. It's magic is that merchants in the US are required to take it by law. Witch believe me makes everything so much easier. There is a cool event in new Hampshire call the Porcupine Freedom festival. It's a libertarian festival where shop owners sell goods/services without government approval or certification. Merchants also pay for said services with hard value payments like gold, silver and so on(they will not take government currency "greenbacks"). Funny thing is that folks spend all day on smart phones checking the price of these metals because they change moment by moment and thus change how much your capital is worth moment by moment. The US dollar gets rid of all that stuff for us.

The concept of credit is absolutely essential for any economy to function. Not just a modern economy but ancient economies like Venice for example. When the Government issues a bond just like in the video it's basically an IOU. You can go out and buy a government bond when ever you want. They have different maturity rates like 30 years and so on. You give the Fed money and in exchange for interest on that bond and the promise to pay it back once it's matured is how it works. That's partly how nearly every government on the planet is funded.

Some folks seem to think that this stuff shouldn't happen and relate the funding of large governments and corporations to the simplicity of a home checkbook. It sounds nice and simple and believe me I wish it was but to do so would be to forfeit your chances of being competitive. It doesn't really make sense to keep things stationary because it causes things to stall out.

Think about it this way. If I gave you $100,000 and you put it under your mattress that 100,000 would loose value because of inflation. Remember managed inflation is a good thing because it stimulates economic activity. So to protect that 100,000 you would need to invest it in something that would payout more then the rate of inflation.

At the end of the day Governments (all governments) get credit from investors who buy bonds from them. Banks get credit from stock, bonds and deposit investors. and you get credit from your local bank. Things only get sticky when people get carried away. We forget that just because it's credit doesn't mean we don't have to pay it back. Capitalism is a boom and bust system and it always has been. 2008, 1998, 80's 70's and so on. We tend to get financial corrections every 10 years for one reason or another. Some one starts getting rich because of some new thing and all the rest jump on the band wagon thinking lightning can't strike. It does and every one backstabs each other on the way down trying to protect them selves. The closest thing i can relate it to is the Red Queen hypothesis

Difference in 2008 was that that correction was tied to home assets of regular hard working people. it was a costly mistake because a home tends to be the largest single investment most americans make.

Anyway I'm totally rambling. I guess my point is that there is no conspiracy here. There are allot of smart MoFos in places like NYC who know how these markets work, how the game is played and how to play it. I'm not saying it's perfect because it's not but the game is the game. Kind of like the dating game. It sucks but what are your choices :p.

Just take care of your self. Keep a close eye on your money and don't over leverage your self to make a buck because you'll always get burned in the end.

Cheers man, I think i like this stuff too much. Let me know if you'd like to keep chatting and will find a better place. No sense clogging this thread up with our ever more unrelated topic :p
 
If both apple and android back the same, not MXC, way to pay then this should be dead. I'll not stop shopping at rite aid or Walmart but no way am I using this crap. I will slide my card and make them pay the fees.
 
That looks like two more steps than Apple Pay. Cashier at Subway didn't have to do squat when I paid tonight.
 
No thank you! I don't want any merchant direct access to my bank account. At least my bank or credit card company can fight on my behalf when there is an issue. Imagine having to contact Walmart customer service for a discrepancy?


Scary
 
I'm sure that Mr. over payed COO will use CurrentC for the cameras but I'd be willing to bet almost every penny I have that his wife just finished ringing up her $800+ Whole Foods shopping list and checked out with her brand-new iPhone 6+ using Apple Pay :D:D:D:D:apple:

hahaha
 
:confused:

Of course customers are part of it. If you look at the Paydiant bPay trial from last year, there will be methods for the merchants to build-in incentives, coupons, offers and such to the CurrentC process, which would be applied at checkout. That's one of the things that attracted retailers to the MCX in the first place.

MCX APOLOGIST! ;)

From a user experience point of view, it's really terrible. Unlock phone, launch app, generate QR code, have cashier scan code. That's twice as many steps as Apple Pay needs.

Based on my experience using QR codes that need to be scanned off the screen, they're notoriously unreliable. I've almost never had one scan on the first try.
 
Still not interested. Convoluted, requires direct linking to a bank account which is scary, and overall not an elegant solution. NFC payments are the future. Apple Pay and Google Wallet are the correct solution.

Just a couple of small points.

1) Most iPhones do not have NFC.

2) Most iPhone models available for sale do not have NFC.

3) It is currently impossible for MCX to implement Current C using NFC on any iPhone - including the 6 and 6plus. Apple doesn't allow it.

Personally, I think that the mobile payment system you designed is a much better system that uniquiely managed to work around Apple's restrictions on NFC and implement it in the iPhone anyway. What was it called again?

----------

MCX APOLOGIST! ;)

From a user experience point of view, it's really terrible. Unlock phone, launch app, generate QR code, have cashier scan code. That's twice as many steps as Apple Pay needs.

Based on my experience using QR codes that need to be scanned off the screen, they're notoriously unreliable. I've almost never had one scan on the first try.


It is currently impossible for MCX to implement Current C using NFC on any iPhone - including the 6 and 6plus. Apple doesn't allow it.

Apple also doesn't allow access to Touch ID.

How do you propose they implement a mobile payment system on the iPhone then without using NFC (since most iPhones don't have it, and those that do don't allow access to the chip)?
 
NFC has won already. MCX... give it up. Its over. It never should have really started.
 
Rankin has a point but it still doesn't fix the awkward process of using MCX. NFC is much better. MCX is dead on arrival. NFC, now that Apple Pay is out, is where things are going for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks have been using QR codes very successfully for quite a while now including with Apple Passbook. Nothing Awkward about it.
 
If both apple and android back the same, not MXC, way to pay then this should be dead. I'll not stop shopping at rite aid or Walmart but no way am I using this crap. I will slide my card and make them pay the fees.

I think what they will do is pass some of the savings back to the customer in loyalty points or some other form of credit. Remember they are avoiding 2.5 to 3 percent on every transaction.

The process can be simple you use CurrentC you get loyalty points, you pay by credit card, no problem but no loyalty points.
 
Problems with CurrentC-

1. Clumsy (obviously), it is way more of a pain to use than a plastic card, so most people will just keep using their card. This has been proven even with apps superior to CurrentC (but inferior to Apple Pay) like Google Wallet.

2. No advantage on price or rewards as credit cards already offer this, and probably better, e.g. I get from 1 to 3% cash back with my credit card across every merchant, others offer airline miles, etc.

3. Security. Seriously, Target of all companies wants us to trust them with direct access to our bank account and sensitive personal information?

4. Fraud disputes. Oh joy, we will get to deal with retailers to reverse fraudulent charges, how much fun is that going to be! These retailers have already shown terrible customer support by disabling NFC.

5. QR codes are one way communication, NFC is 2 way and thus much more powerful. As a result, CurrentC will never be as easy to use as NFC based solutions like Apple Pay.

6. Lack of support for credit (at least initially). Some people need to make purchases on credit as they don't have cash handy. And some don't want transactions debited directly from checking as a measure against fraud.

P.S. To the poster who said Apple doesn't allow access to Touch ID, you are ignorant, please do some research to increase your knowledge.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.