postpone? why not cancel?
This is so dumb... I was just in London for 2 weeks, and you could use Apple Pay almost everywhere there because they are so current on contactless payment cards. It was glorious. Pubs, supermarkets, restaurants, the "tube", everywhere. It was amazing, and really made the Apple Watch shine.
Can't tell if sarcasm or not... all the big supermarkets like Tesco, Sainsburys, Morrisons and Asda (which by the way is owned by Wallmart) have used chip&pin for best part of a decade and are even rolling out NFC (inc apple pay) in many stores also.
ApplePay didn't kill CurrentC, WalMart did. In fact, it just morphed into WalMartPay. With over 20 million current users of the WalMart App, six months of working out the kinks, and now the addition of 600+ WalMarts, this will only have it ready for the holiday season.
You may not like WalMart, but for tons of people, it's a beloved retailer. And for many, many people, it's the only option. In tons of college towns it's the preferred (if not only) large retailer. Many of those college students will become loyal customers. So hooking them on WalMartPay is a smart move. It will only get better with time. WalMart is a behemoth and will not cede anything to Apple. Gathering all that data from millions of transactions will reap rewards for them. And make it lest likely that ApplePay will be supported any time soon. If at all.
It's the other way round. With a smaller market share, support for ApplePay out at the retailer level may pale in comparison to AndroidPay. As such, it can influence smartphone buyers' choice of platform. MC vs Visa is another one where Visa has an edge due to penetration, although comparable.
That's just silly. Chip cards are demonstrably MUCH slower than swipe, and that's without adding a PIN. With a PIN, I would say it's on the order of 10-20x slower. I have used chip & PIN throughout Europe and seen it attempted at Target in the US, with disastrous results (in terms of wasted time). Here's the difference between Europe and USA: Europe is still a quaint little place that operates at a pace and volume an order of magnitude slower than the US. Chip and PIN is fine at a local pub in England, a quaint restaurant in old town Prague, or a drugstore in Paris. It doesn't, however, work at a US megastore like Target, which does in one hour the volume of transactions that any of those places do in a week. Chip & PIN just doesn't scale to US consumerism. At least not without a lot of pain. Europeans tolerate chip & PIN because they plan to sit and sip wine and chat for 2 hours at the restaurant after dinner - while in America, the Cheesecake Factory wants to process you and get you out the door FAST to make more revenue off that table. Same with retail store purchases. More speed = more revenue. We buy stuff as fast as they can sell it.
It's the other way round. With a smaller market share, support for ApplePay out at the retailer level may pale in comparison to AndroidPay. As such, it can influence smartphone buyers' choice of platform. MC vs Visa is another one where Visa has an edge due to penetration, although comparable.
I absolutely love it. Now in app usage needs to rise and then finally we need to be able to make a better system for online payments.
"Utilizing unique feedback from the marketplace and our Columbus pilot, MCX has made a decision to concentrate mode heavily in the immediate term on other aspects of our business including working with financial institutions, like our partnership with Chase, to enable and scale mobile payment solutions. As part of this transition, MCX will postpone a nationwide rollout of its CurrentC application."
Translation: We're going out of business and are holding onto a handful of sand.
Apple Pay is a consumer service, while Walmart Pay benefits Walmart above all else. In fact it's safe to assume that any retailer that has not activated Apple Pay is doing so because of AP's strict privacy guidelines that prevent these retailers from mining your data.
I think you missed the countless studies that have shown Apple users are way more enaged and way more likely to spend money compared to their Android counterparts. Therefore the higher usage of Apple Pay compared to Android Pay shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
Latest studies show that while awareness of Apple Pay in the US is high, at this point in time, the typical financial institution can only expect 1 to 2% of cardholders to use Apple Pay two or more times.
If you are talking about ApplePay taking nibbles out of merchants income causing raised prices, you are ignorant. AP takes its bite out of the bank's transaction fee income.I hope they all catch colera and snuff it. This payments program lark is yet another cheating program, where the so-called provider takes nibbles out and thus earns billions. The stupid consumer thinks "Oh that is alright" because he doesn't realise that the product prices are notched up accordingly so that none of those in the vendor chain lose out. In other words it is another hidden cost applied to the unsuspecting citizen and should be opposed by everyone at all costs.
Apple Pay is a consumer service, while Walmart Pay benefits Walmart above all else. In fact it's safe to assume that any retailer that has not activated Apple Pay is doing so because of AP's strict privacy guidelines that prevent these retailers from mining your data.
Apple itself is quite happy to let retailers mine data, as long as they partner with Apple. E.g. Apple lets Kohls register its own cards so the token and loyalty are combined.
More importantly, Apple is quite happy to let banks continue to mine our purchase data, in return for which Apple gets a cut of each purchase. The banks themselves are happy about this deal as well, since now they charge retailers for setting up targeted coupons etc.
I agree, Apple should be forcing apps to leverage both Apple Pay and Touch ID.I think you missed the countless studies that have shown Apple users are way more enaged and way more likely to spend money compared to their Android counterparts. Therefore the higher usage of Apple Pay compared to Android Pay shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
[doublepost=1463495213][/doublepost]
I have sent feedback to Apple many times suggesting that they should make it a requirement that any app which sells anything needs to include Apple Pay as a payment option. I don't think that's a lot to ask for.
I don't know where you got that quote, but I never said it...
View attachment 631707
Apple Watch, push button twice tip watch and leave, one that is better.Fantastic news. This made no sense in the first place. Fragmenting the market was unnecessary. It's hard to find a solution easier than just taking out my phone and then leaving lol.
Sure, but even that's not enough to make US merchants commit to NFC payments, especially since even Apple Pay usage is not that high. In fact, the percentage using it has dropped.
Latest studies show that while awareness of Apple Pay in the US is high, at this point in time, the typical financial institution can only expect 1 to 2% of cardholders to use Apple Pay two or more times.