Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

thewall

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 2, 2007
147
37
U.K
I have a 27" iMac which has 4 slots for memory there is 2 8gb installed would it be ok to fill the 2 other slots with 16gb in each slot or do i have to stick to 2 8gb to make 24gb
 
I think you can mix and match in pairs, so 8GB + 16GB should work. In fact in my final 27" iMac, that's exactly what I had installed for a total of 24GB of RAM. That worked just fine for MANY years.

If the 8GB is factory installed and working fine, the 2 empty slots will be where the new RAM goes. They might not be side by side and that's OK. Just fill the RAM slots that are open with the new RAM.

And isn't is so, SOOOOOOOO consumer nice to be able to buy 16GB RAM "upgrade" for far less than $200+? Competition is good. Only one seller of anything just about always exploits their lock on the market.

Edit: on a re-read, I now realize you may mean add 32GB to the 16GB you already have. That should work fine too. My iMac was twin 4GB = 8GB in two slots plus twin 8GB = 16GB in 2 other slots for 24GB in total. That worked just fine. Your 16GB + 32GB = 48GB should work just fine too. Either way, the rest of the advice remains the same. If the 16GB is properly installed now, insert the new pair of RAM sticks in the other 2 open slots (which might not be adjacent).
 
Last edited:
Which iMac? Yes you can mix and match, but do you really need 40 GB (8 + 32)? Depending upon your usage, 24 GB (8 + 16) may be totally fine.

Either way, just make sure you install them appropriately as pairs. And make sure you buy the correct RAM with the proper RAM timings. Some stores market this as "Apple-compatible" RAM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrey84
I have a 27" iMac which has 4 slots for memory there is 2 8gb installed would it be ok to fill the 2 other slots with 16gb in each slot or do i have to stick to 2 8gb to make 24gb
Yes you can add 2x16GB to your 2x8GB, but if you have a 2020 iMac the memory transfer speed will drop. However if it is older than about 2017 iMac, it may not support 16GB sticks (not certain until you try, as officially they do not, but actually they may.)
 
Last edited:
Perhaps someone needs to shop OUTSIDE the Apple bubble, where robust competition for RAM & SSD delivers great value for consumers.

But yes, if one can only think within the Appleverse, those opportunities are gone now and we consumers can thoroughly pay for it. Shareholders rejoice!
 
Last edited:
I have a 27" iMac which has 4 slots for memory there is 2 8gb installed would it be ok to fill the 2 other slots with 16gb in each slot or do i have to stick to 2 8gb to make 24gb
It’s really simple, the answer is YES.

2x8GB+2x16GB will be fine. As long as there is an even number of modules and the pairs are of equal size, so you’re getting the "dual-channel" advantage.

You will need to do more research on how to install the modules - or hopefully someone knowledgeable from MacRumors could help?
This article suggests installing the modules in this order: 16,8,16,8
How to allocate the RAM slots

Also don’t waste time trying to save 30 bucks by going to 32GB instead of 48GB. It’s not worth it.
Also as someone mentioned above make sure to buy correct matching RAM.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
It’s really simple, the answer is YES.

8+8+16+16 will be fine. As long as there is an even number of modules and the pairs are of equal size, so you’re getting the "dual-channel" advantage.

You will need to do more research on how to install the modules - or hopefully someone knowledgeable from MacRumors could help?
This article suggest installing the modules in this order: 16+8+16+8

Also don’t waste time trying to save 50 bucks by going to 32GB instead of 40GB. It’s not worth it.
Also as someone mentioned above make sure to buy correct matching RAM.

How should the OP interpret your description "16+8+16+8" to a 2x2 slots positioning on his iMac?
Upper row: 16 + 16
Lower row: 8 + 8

Or
Upper row: 16 + 8
Lower row: 16 + 8
 
How should the OP interpret your description "16+8+16+8" to a 2x2 slots positioning on his iMac?
Upper row: 16 + 16
Lower row: 8 + 8

Or
Upper row: 16 + 8
Lower row: 16 + 8
So this is exactly what I’m not sure about - the installation - and I’ve merely copied the suggested order of installation from that article above. Do you know the right way?
 
So this is exactly what I’m not sure about - the installation - and I’ve merely copied the suggested order of installation from that article above. Do you know the right way?

The right way for me was easy: I purchased 4 sticks of the same specs. Ho headache.
RAM are quite cheap now, especially if you don't mind about their being 2nd hand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrey84
@Nguyen Duc Hieu @thewall
Found the answer on how to install them!
It's indeed 16,8,16,8 (counting down from the power socket)
Source:
"If your DIMMs are mixed in capacity, minimise the capacity difference between Channel A (slots 1 and 2) and Channel B (slots 3 and 4) when possible."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Nguyen Duc Hieu
I have a 27" iMac which has 4 slots for memory there is 2 8gb installed would it be ok to fill the 2 other slots with 16gb in each slot or do i have to stick to 2 8gb to make 24gb
Hey, I found the full explanation here!
It's a short video just 6 mins.
The correct installation order is 16,8,16,8 - counting down from the power socket
Keep us updated on the upgrade please! I want to see screenshots and photos ;)

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Nguyen Duc Hieu
Hi Audrey84 i have installed my ram now, i had 16gb 2666 mhz pre installed in slots 1 and 3, i purchased 2 x 16gb 2666 mhz and installed them into slots 2 and 4 bt now the speed has gone down to 2133 mhz, is this normal or is it because i didn't install the larger ram in slots 1 and 3
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-01-05 at 08.39.17.png
    Screenshot 2024-01-05 at 08.39.17.png
    98.4 KB · Views: 52
  • Screenshot 2024-01-05 at 08.45.21.png
    Screenshot 2024-01-05 at 08.45.21.png
    332.3 KB · Views: 50
Hi Audrey84 i have installed my ram now, i had 16gb 2666 mhz pre installed in slots 1 and 3, i purchased 2 x 16gb 2666 mhz and installed them into slots 2 and 4 bt now the speed has gone down to 2133 mhz, is this normal or is it because i didn't install the larger ram in slots 1 and 3
No, this is not normal. Please try the other way round - put your new, larger memory, into slots 1 & 3, and the old memory into 2 & 4 and see what it says.
We have the same 2020 Core i9 iMac, it shows 128GB 2667Mhz DDR4.
 
Thanks for the reply Audrey84 change them round but still reduced speed, is there a reason and would i notice much difference.
I installed a set of Corsair ram sticks, spec says they are made for my Mac.
 
Thanks for the reply Audrey84 change them round but still reduced speed, is there a reason and would i notice much difference.
I installed a set of Corsair ram sticks, spec says they are made for my Mac.
Well, you’ve done what you could. There was a thread here about this. But I don’t have the link.

You won’t notice the difference anyway. Congratulations on the upgrade!
 
Thanks for the reply Audrey84 change them round but still reduced speed, is there a reason and would i notice much difference.
I installed a set of Corsair ram sticks, spec says they are made for my Mac.
See post #6
"...but if you have a 2020 iMac the memory transfer speed will drop"

For a 2020 iMac you need to have all sticks the same size, else either the speed drops to 2133 MHz, or you lose full dual channel (which is even worse), depending on how you arrange them in the slots. There is no way to use different size sticks in a 2020 iMac at full speed AND full dual channel
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EugW and Andrey84
Thanks for the reply Audrey84 change them round but still reduced speed, is there a reason and would i notice much difference.
A 20% drop in memory transfer speed will likely result in something like 5-10% drop in processing speed (based on benchmark comparisons). So it depends on whether the additional memory is more important to you (e.g., to avoid swapping memory to disc, which is really slow), or the 5-10% loss of processing speed.

Personally, I would install just 2x16GB (in slots 1 and 3, or 2 and 4) and toss the 8GB, which is exactly what I actually did. This gives one a decent 32GB, enough for most people, running at full speed with no compromises
 
Last edited:
A 20% drop in memory transfer speed will likely result in something like 5-10% drop in processing speed (based on benchmark comparisons). So it depends on whether the additional memory is more important to you (e.g., to avoid swapping memory to disc, which is really slow), or the 5-10% loss of processing speed.

Personally, I would install just 2x16GB (in slots 1 and 3, or 2 and 4) and toss the 8GB, which is exactly what I actually did. This gives one a decent 32GB, enough for most people, running at full speed with no compromises
Can you substantiate these numbers?
I remember seeing a benchmark video where RAM frequency made almost no difference.
 
Personally, I would install just 2x16GB (in slots 1 and 3, or 2 and 4) and toss the 8GB, which is exactly what I actually did. This gives one a decent 32GB, enough for most people, running at full speed with no compromises
Interesting Wilberforce
48gb is way over kill for what i use the Mac for, photo editing and browsing only brought the extra ram because i could, might try what you suggest and take out the 8gb's
 
  • Like
Reactions: HobeSoundDarryl
Can you substantiate these numbers?
I remember seeing a benchmark video where RAM frequency made almost no difference.
Sure, my own benchmark measurements on my i7 2020 iMac:

64GB RAM running at 2667 MHz: 8740 to 9029 multi-score Geekbench 5, memory transfer speed 28500 to 29600 MB/s Novabench.

64GB RAM running at 2133 MHz: 8240 multi-score Geekbench 5, memory transfer speed 24500 to 25660 MB/s Novabench.

Basically 6 to 9 percent drop in CPU multi-score (which I rounded up to 5 to 10 percent in my previous post), and 10 to 17 percent drop in RAM speed score.

These are only my personal tests, but I tried to be as fair as possible, I had no other apps running in the background, did it after rebooting and waiting several minutes. I was trying myself to figure out if dropping to 2133 made a significant impact.

Of course, real world performance is not same as benchmarks, but benchmarks are (almost) the only way we have to quantify comparisons.

Interpret how you wish :)

btw, OP can run their own Geekbench and Novabench comparisons if doubtful.

I would comment that running RAM with mismatched amounts in each channel (i.e., not full dual channel) results in even worse CPU multi-scores and RAM speed scores
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Nguyen Duc Hieu
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.