Andrey84
macrumors 6502
Thanks for this. Yes, the difference in GeekBench is noticeable.Sure, my own benchmark measurements on my i7 2020 iMac:
64GB RAM running at 2667 MHz: 8740 to 9029 multi-score Geekbench 5, memory transfer speed 28500 to 29600 MB/s Novabench.
64GB RAM running at 2133 MHz: 8240 multi-score Geekbench 5, memory transfer speed 24500 to 25660 MB/s Novabench.
Basically 6 to 9 percent drop in CPU multi-score (which I rounded up to 5 to 10 percent in my previous post), and 10 to 17 percent drop in RAM speed score.
These are only my personal tests, but I tried to be as fair as possible, I had no other apps running in the background, did it after rebooting and waiting several minutes. I was trying myself to figure out if dropping to 2133 made a significant impact.
Of course, real world performance is not same as benchmarks, but benchmarks are (almost) the only way we have to quantify comparisons.
Interpret how you wish 🙂
btw, OP can run their own Geekbench and Novabench comparisons if doubtful.
I would comment that running RAM with mismatched amounts in each channel (i.e., not full dual channel) results in even worse CPU multi-scores and RAM speed scores
However, in the real world it’s had to say what it will be.
For memory transfer speed to become a bottleneck, I expect continuous loading of big volumes of new data, like video editing, rendering or benchmarks. I don’t see how normal system work and photo editing could be affected.
Thanks for mentioning the speed drop at the beginning in post #6. I guess we both missed it. You didn’t quantify the drop, and the comment wasn’t written like a warning, so we assumed an insignificant drop. Maybe it is.
Up to OP to keep 48GB @2133 or 32 GB @2667.