tvguru said:Moral of the story: Buy when you need, be happy with what you have.
Yebot said:This rumor does not sound promising.
Everyone should read this quote about 50 times. Well put. After September 12 I am buying a MBP. Merom or no Merom, it will still be the best portable around for my needs.
AntonicKnight said:Then where did the Meroms in the new iMac come from?
Surely Intel doesn't have the power to tell Apple in which computers to put their chips. Besides, other PC manufacturers already announced many laptops with Core 2 Duo in them. I bet they'll ship before January 07.
I agree.teme said:If there isn't enough Meroms available, I think Apple's priority for Meroms would have been Macbook Pro's, not iMacs.
witness said:I agree.
We seem to be heading back to the point where consumer products (iMacs) are better than pro products (MBP).
I really need more than 2GB in my MBP, 3 GB would be nice (like the new iMacs) but 4GB would be better. Apple seem to be lagging behind other manufacturers on this front, so I can't believe that we will have to wait till 2007.
crees! said:Alright everyone, just think back. Apple did this before (update the iMac before Powerbooks). How much longer was it till the PBs were upgraded and surpassed the iMacs? Was it 1 or 2 weeks, or longer?
Dunepilot said:Yeah, but before it was always about the G4/G5 portable/desktop divide. I don't see Apple being happy having a slower 'Pro' machine than an 'i' machine for long. It's not how they like to market, and any time their Pro laptop is slower than an 'i' desktop, it's a bit embarrassing.
I'd give it a week or two before new MacBook Pros.
stillwater said:That story doesn't make any sense to me. Apple is already putting Meroms in the new iMac. That belies the idea that the chips are in short supply.
poppe said:You guys are alll wrong... Merom went to the iMacs for a reason. BECAUSE Conroe is going in to the MBP! That way MBP has no problem looking better than the iMac... Duh guys... duh...