competition is good but only when the companies competing are forever playing cat and mouse with innovation. This isn't happening. What has Microsoft brought to the board that hasnt been done yet?
Gotta love those screws...
I predict the Microcrap Zune Touch hype to die within a month of its release.
Horrible aren't they, wonder why they're so exposed like that?
The past gives a glimpse of the future. Truly this looks like repeat "not ready for prime-time" effort on the Zune division's part. Just look at the mistakes in the PR picture. The PR picture! Then look at the design. It would have been cool looking if it were still 2004; the edge back is anti- ergonomic and the screws showing is a design faux pas for an "upscale" device. Then you get to the guts & see the screen resolution doesn't improve on the current iPod Touch...and we've yet to see what the next Touch will deliver, which will be what the Zune HD is really competing against.
Now maybe there is some goodness inside, obviously no one can say since no one outside of M$ has tested it. But from what we know I'd say I'm not expecting too much, and not just because it's M$, but because M$ just isn't putting its heart into the Zune project. It is, and always has been, a "me too" device. It may have more features than the iPods, but it lacks in design, interface, and connectivity polish.
Plenty of people will buy Zune HDs, but for the wrong reason. They won't buy it because it is the best media player on the market but rather because it's not Apple. The ironic thing is that both M$ and Apple are multi-billion dollar Goliaths in their own right, who, if they could, would corner the market and squeeze the consumer any way possible if they had the opportunity. Actually M$ did and nearly got away with it.
Horrible aren't they, wonder why they're so exposed like that?
Yes well it did come out 2 years late so they can attack all they want, and screw competition, if they wanted to compete they would have brought it out before Apple brought out the ipod touch, but no they bring it out 2 years later, and they are competiting, lol.I really appreciate that the only reason why this is dumb (note that no one here has touched or even seen the thing IRL) is because it's ugly* and because of the weak software**
*bull, It's a similar design to what Apple's been doing.
**which, again, no one here has any information on.
Tell me again what makes an iPod touch so much better? The App Store? Do you all not remember that the first generation iPod didn't have an app store? Yet, I'm sure all of you would be attacking this Zune even if it were out before the iPod touch.
Hehehehe, what a joke and they have the same pic on the official site..![]()
How ironic, if it had a 480x320 screen like the iPod touch (instead of 480x272) you'd be able to see the whole "marketplace" instead of having the "e" chopped off...
Maybe they voted negative because they don't like the product, lol.It means changing the battery will be easier. The ability to play HD movies back to a TV through a dock blows away the iPod Touch's current capabilities. Apple doesn't seem to want you to be able to do too much with their devices, at least until competition of some kind FORCES them to do it. So either way, this is GOOD for us the consumer. I cannot fathom why anyone would vote negative about this thread except for Apple fanatics that want Apple to rule the world. Otherwise, competition is always GOOD for the consumer because it means better products and lower prices. But I don't think too many Apple fanatics care about such things. Apple seems to be more of a religion for them than a company selling electronics and operating systems.
Now if only someone could force Apple to add more features to AppleTV....
When we are talking about competition, we mean functionality... Not money.
Example: a good Zune HD with new hardware and software will force Apple to be at the top of their game and vice versa. If there is no competition than there is no reason to introduce new features as people will be forced to use that product anyway.
Apple has a huge market share % in the MP3 market. They are the dominating force. They could be called a "monopoly" but I doubt anything is going to be done about it.
Okay. Fine. If Zune can't use Multi-Touch (because Apple thought of it first), then iPod/iPhone can't use OLED because (because Microsoft thought of it first).
Not directed to you, but it's amazing how hypocritical some of you fanboys can be. It's so-so okay when the competition does something first (OLED, FM), but you guys scream bloody murder "epic fail" when Apple does it first and others follow. Nice... nice.![]()
Okay, what about Apple's monopoly on OSX. It can only run (mostly) on Apple's own hardware. That's even more of an obvious monopoly tactic than Microsoft's with Windows. (Even before that was controlled by the government.)
Firstly, the HD doesn't mean high definition. It's just a gimmick.
Second, MS doesn't know how to design, whether hardware or interfaces.
ZuneHD = about 2 years too late. Been there/done that with Apple already.
competition is good but only when the companies competing are forever playing cat and mouse with innovation. This isn't happening. What has Microsoft brought to the board that hasn’t been done yet?
Firstly, the HD doesn't mean high definition. It's just a gimmick.
Second, MS doesn't know how to design, whether hardware or interfaces.
ZuneHD = about 2 years too late. Been there/done that with Apple already.
It obviously was intentional. It's called style. If apple introduced screws as an accent then all of a sudden it would be considered "cool."
The HD stands for the fact that you can display hi-def videos to an external HD tv..
Also, Apple was about 15 years late to the cell phone market, and it worked out well, no?
Because Apple's implementation would look good. Where as Microsoft's looks ugly. My opinion of course.
As Judge Alsop in the Psystar vs Apple case decided, Apple doesn't have a monopoly on MacOS X, because MacOS X doesn't define a market in which a company could have a monopoly. The relevant market would be operating systems, and Apple has less than 10 percent market share in that market. A company doesn't have a monopoly in its own products, and there is legal precedent after precedent for that.
By not doing that, but something new, you know...innovate?
Apple pioneered that design and a company as large as MS could afford to make a fresh product and not just a cold pasta product.
It obviously was intentional. It's called style. If apple introduced screws as an accent then all of a sudden it would be considered "cool."
That is nonsense, what has Microsoft in 2 going to 3 years of bringing out the Zune done for ipod users, it has done nothing. Screw competition, they haven't brought out any features that Apple has actually used in their products, competition indeed.
Horrible aren't they, wonder why they're so exposed like that?
Screws are good! Ever try to take apart a 3G nano...
Because Apple's implementation would look good. Where as Microsoft's looks ugly. My opinion of course.
Because Apple's implementation would look good. Where as Microsoft's looks ugly. My opinion of course.
I agree with Linx. The screws don't look bad IN THE PICTURE and it probably makes it a lot easier to open and hack.
But of course, everyone's making their opinions based on a single set of pictures. Have any of you actually touched it? Played with it?
That little fat iPod nano looked horrendous in pictures compared to this new Zune but it verged on being cute in person. However in person it didn't look as good or svelte as the pictures of this new Zune.
PS - I've never owned a Zune or an iPod. iPods are just way too expensive for what they offer.
I do love my non-jailbroken iPhone though - when it's not crashing or slowing down or choking on an update or ...
Really. A "blind case study" was done to see what if 5 year olds made contrast art and also added art from big names to see of people could tell the difference. Turned out the art that was designed by the 5 year olds were more desired.
In reality because it says "Microsoft" then people here say that's ugly. But if Apple designed it people would say looks awesome. I like that the aluminum is back over the plastic back. The screws were a nice accenting touch. Ohhhh the attention to detail as the fan boys would claim as they touch themselves.
Really..... Not very much constructive criticism here at this forum. Just bias opinion. I guess that's why it's called "Mac"Rumors. Comical really.