Pretty sweet.
... I'm not sure why everyone is so focused on a "camera", it does so much more than that.
... I'm not sure why everyone is so focused on a "camera", it does so much more than that.
Its for staff use, not customers... obviously. :-\
A lot of bars and restaurants already have touch screen terminals around the joints for staff use... I don't see smashed glass where customers have tried using them...
This device would be a further step in the touch screen evolution.
You'd have to have a pretty strong plexiglass cover for a New York bar, if you ask me (and how would the touch screen work then?)
Again, please look at the technology, the top is just a sheet of plastic, the technology is 2 infra-red cameras placed below the surface to record the touches... it is NOT a touch screen!
A video was posted not to long ago demo'ing this from MS already.
This is like Jeff Han kind of stuff, again, nothing THAT original from MS.
another unoriginal product from msft.
what? if apple made a product using this technology, you would be rubbing it in everyone's face.
While the finger/hand may be the "universal tool" there are other, specialized tools that excel for certain apps.
The great thing is, MS is putting this in $5k-$10k commercial machines. Apple already has it in a phone, and I bet we'll see it on macs in the near future.
Interestingly, in this video,
http://on10.net/Blogs/larry/first-look-microsoft-surfacing-computing/ the microsoft guy says the project started 4 years ago - before Jeff Han's demo.
There is one big difference here - Jeff's (and the iPhone) technology are using the touch to the surface of the 'screen' whereas the Microsoft solution is to place cameras under the screen to record the surface 'touch'... very different solutions!
100% agreed. I already expected something like this long before I visited this thread...
I think the last video with the Zune and the digital camera is quite impressive. I guess digging through a 1200+ album music library would be rather time consuming, though...![]()
how boring. a big tablet...
i just have to say that multitouch was started on tablet PCs, not on the iPhone. people keep attributing multitouch to the iPhone which is not where it started.
thx.
One thing that interests me, have they actually got deals with Visa/Mastercard/The banks for the credit card feature, or is it a theoretical use in 5 years, personally I'd be inclined to go with the latter, and I suspect that could apply to many of the other uses too.
There is one big difference here - Jeff's (and the iPhone) technology are using the touch to the surface of the 'screen' whereas the Microsoft solution is to place cameras under the screen to record the surface 'touch'... very different solutions!
No? But you Mac geeks will spend 5-10k on a MacPro any old day. That on a machine that's outdated and underpowered for the time being.5k -10k.....no thanks...