One day I will truly find out why so many hate Windows (it is compatible with so much) without an OS war.
The reason you don't see SP's being used in portrait mode is that the font rendering works best in landscape mode.
And the long narrow profile (in portrait) isn't the best layout for many apps or even web pages. How about a picture of you holding it in landscape mode (tablet-style)? What can you do with your thumbs to make interacting with it even partially do-able? And how long can you even hold it this way? I found it tough to even watch videos, without having something to prop it on.
I was 5 years a Windows user, bevor I switched to Mac 3 years ago, the reasons:
- Bluescreen
- Virus
- Registry
- Defragmentation
- Dll
- Spyware
- System reinstalling
- Troubleshootings
- Software installer
- System updates
- Adwares
Never again !
I can and do use a stylus, and it's cheaper than the SP3. I think they are very overpriced.
The long narrow thing was more a problem with the SP1 & 2. And yeah, a 16:9 aspect ratio does suck severely for portrait.
I have heard a few times that the registry is a weakness.
Not only is it too expensive, but have you experienced the screen lag with the surface products? It's not very good for taking notes or drawing, unless you are fine with the ink trailing far behind your stylus.
I think the guy just went down a list of generic Windows complaints people have had over the years, and posted it all here.
Like the registry? I've been using Windows for years, and I've never had a registry issue. I've heard of it happening, but I've never experienced it myself. Normally, it's not something you mess with or even think about unless you want to change some little goofy thing, like making the border padding thinner on windows (I'm so glad they're removing them in Win10).
Same with .dll files. .dll hell used to be a problem back on Windows 95, but...yeah, that was 20 years ago. Now, they're just files. You never have to mess with them whatsoever unless, once again, you're wanting to change some deep level thing in how Windows looks or functions.
Tried it once, and you're right: it wasn't that great.
This years trendy concept, a while back it was Desktop Replacement, ie a very large laptop.
I already have a laptop replacement, an iPad with an Apple Bluetooth keyboard (when needed).
I can do 90% of what I do on a macbook with the iPad, I can and do use a stylus, and it's cheaper than the SP3. I think they are very overpriced.
I only use the iPad for light surfing. To get work done I use the Surface Pro 3. Macbook Air is a bad comparison since it has terrible resolution. Apple needs an updated Macbook Air 2 hybrid with retina resolution, touch screen, precision pen and detachable keyboard.
As far as lapability SP3 is superior with kickstand since I can have my legs stretched out in a downward incline and it won't tip over like Macbooks. There's also the health benefit that the heat exhaust is directed from top and not from bottom towards your private area.
I'm so used to windows nothing is really an issue on a personal level as I can fix it. I mess with the registry at times (I know what I am doing) and have run into a missing dll yet it's not too common. Of course we all have our reasons for why we use what we use. I will end up using both because they can do their own tasks.
3) MacRumors puts these posts on here because it is an ad comparing Apple. You're mad at this site which has no affiliation with Apple because it is doing a story on an Apple competitor? I never thought this level of fanboy could be reached...even on this site.
Surface Pro 3 has been out for 4 months and has had multiple posts on here with corrections about what it includes and how it works from actual users like me...and still, idiots on here who have never even used the device regurgitate false information.
those competitors can't do one thing , the thing Microsoft makes almost all their money off of , enterprise.
linux , osx , chrome os, all have non existent enterprise offerings.
Microsofts declining os sales are very unlikely to effect them much , especially when governments and businesses haves hundreds of millions invested in their infrastructure.
i hope you didn't take my original comment as an insult , i did not mean it like that.
your post borderlines irony.
Same here. I've used all of the big three, and while each one has its ups and downs, I wouldn't say any one of them is truly better than the others.
Like OSX has a better UI, and a helluva lot better out of the box experience. Windows is kinda meat and potatoes there. For general usage, it's a little more elegant and fun to use, but when it comes to getting something done, I could go with either/or. I'd use the same apps on both, and I've never had much trouble with Windows flaking out at random since early XP, so it's all just patio furnishing to me.
As does yours if I'm to believe what you've written in this thread alone.
Yep, everyone has its good and bad. I've done Linux a few times and my needs would have to drop to simplistic levels to be able to use it. There are just too many things it cannot do. Ubuntu got a little odd so I tired Mint, quite nice, there are a few things I even like about it over windows. However it had issues with the touch screen.
If you want to use a touchscreen with Linux, use Gnome 3. It's the only UI I've seen that manages to strike that perfect balance between touch and desktop. Plus (looks around suspiciously), OSX has seemingly taken more than a few design cues from it recently.
My biggest problem with Linux is a pretty straightforward one: it simply doesn't have all the stuff I want to use. I use PS quite a bit, and I tried to give it up, and go with GIMP, but...naw. All that did was make me mad and frustrated.
What? You're not making any sense.
What does it run of OS? Does it have an iOS equivalent or it does it run windows (with viruses / bloatware).