Let's compare them.
Why is one at an angle and the other straight on?
Let's compare them.
I just wouldn't do a trade-in. Sell on craigslist or ebay and you will get a lot more...Microsoft's deal is "up-to" $650...meaning the only way you get that is if you go to an Apple store, buy a $1499 specced air and bring it into the Microsoft store.http://www.gazelle.com is paying good money for old apple laptops .... (less than 650, but MS can write off the loss)
What I'm more curious in knowing is what they do with the traded-in MacBook Airs. They can't possibly be reselling them, even for parts?
Let's compare them.
Let's compare specs, rather than a couple of cheesed cheated angle shots.
iPad 3 and Air Thickness Per Apple
iPad 3
Depth: 0.37 inch (9.4 mm)
iPad Air
Depth: 0.29 inch (7.5 mm)
Surface Pro 3 Thickness Per MS
SP3
Depth: 0.36 in (9.1 mm)
It's a tiny bit thinner than the iPad 3, and only slightly larger than the iPad Air. Your pictures mean nothing.
Especially because of angling differences.
So desperate this is, a media hoax I thought it was.
Sure, didn't mean to imply desperation - I doubt MS is "desperate" in the normal meaning of the word.
I think it somewhat cheapens the brand, and highlights to me that Microsoft itself isn't quite sure how to present the SP3. At the high end, I think it's too expensive, and at the low end I think it kind of gets lost in all the sub-$1K noise.
You should try it, if you live near a Microsoft Store, before you call it crappy. I've tried it and I found it to be an excellent machine. It is very smooth and responsive. The resolution is out of this world compared to the Air. Just saying...
Great, so movies will look good on it?
Seems like a lot to pay for a portable video player.
Resolution doesn't matter a TON when the screen is so small.
Wouldn't someone rather trade in an MBA for an iPad?
Why would somebody trade a MBA for an iPad? At least with a SP 3 (not that this is a good deal), you can still run a lot of programs you might have been running on your MBA.
Great, so movies will look good on it?
Seems like a lot to pay for a portable video player.
Resolution doesn't matter a TON when the screen is so small.
Wouldn't someone rather trade in an MBA for an iPad?
They never mentioned using it as a video player.
Either way, the resolutions are virtually the same (SP3 has larger screen, the Air technically has more PPI) so the point is moot.
Maybe they have a work desktop and don't need a full computer at home.
I'd go with the sharper screen, regardless of resolution, and I'm betting a lot of poor-eyesight-having people will do the same.