Lets be honest, iWork is an atrocity.
It's not an atrocity and not meant to compete on the same level of MS Office. And Keynote is really good, some even prefer it over PPT.
Lets be honest, iWork is an atrocity.
It's not an atrocity and not meant to compete on the same level of MS Office. And Keynote is really good, some even prefer it over PPT.
no apples approach is totally stupid. you spent so much time flipping through apps it almost makes your head spin and then you have to guess and hope a certain app can open a certain file instead of simply having a project consisting of different file types in one place and you get a collection of different options to open it with. even my grandma gets it. i also want to know where my files are stores. does opening it inside an app make a copy or does it change the original file? no idea. apples the only one i can think of with such a twisted thinking of a cloud system.
Lets be honest, iWork is an atrocity.
I like Pages, but my concern is that the file format is totally closed and no other application can open it.
If you send a Word document to someone you are pretty sure they will be able to view it on any computer/tablet/phone.
Also while I really like Macs (and have only been using Macs as my personal computers for over 10 years), I want to keep the door open shall I have to / want to move to another platform.
Not to mention that sometimes (for example at work) I only have a access to a PC, and if I was using Pages for everything I would have been stuck quite a few times having to quickly review/modify a document from a PC but not having the right application to open it (granted the web apps on iCould.com and iOS applications are partly helping with this).
iWork is much better and free.
MS Office is total abomination of software no one needs it. Won't install even if for free.
Except that....
iWork is free.
Office is not.
Hence, I'll continue using iWork. It's good enough that I don't want to have to pay a subscription or any money for office software.
It's interesting that apple keeps updating it. I'm not sure why Apple hasn't just sat back and let Chrome take the lead.
I've never understood this need to have a file browser on iOS. Are we still in 1980 or something? Apple has created a more advanced system that works much better IMO. There are a few hiccups that need to be work out though like for example there is no Textedit app on iOS yet. But having the apps directly connected to the files they make is just so much more intuitive than the archaic file management system we've been using for decades.
Your example of browsing for a file and then "Open In" an application certainly isn't faster or more intuitive. That's just what you are used to. It is undeniably faster to open the application first and then open the file you want. Simply because the number of files you have to browse through to find the one you want are narrowed down significantly compared the old archaic method.
Yeah, why doesn't Apple just sit back and let everyone else pass them by on everything??? For one thing, I personally HATE Chrome and wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole. I don't like Safari either. I've had to make some changes (e.g. classic theme restorer plus a good theme) but Firefox still has the capability to LOOK and act like a proper browser, not just a money making machine that only looks at ONE area (i.e. supposedly "fast" whereas CONTROL is what I want, not some minimalist browser designed to sit on Youtube all day long).
Honestly, what you say reflects the opposite on Apple (i.e. with their levels of capital, WTF can't they lead in EVERY SINGLE AREA? Apple always seems to have excuse of not enough resources. Well, letting hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars in "resources" sit there while all these companies take over all these product areas is ridiculous. Yes, Apple makes TONS of money, but it is on relatively few products. It could expand into all these areas with all that wasted money just sitting there doing nothing.
iWork is much better and free.
MS Office is total abomination of software no one needs it. Won't install even if for free.
- It suffers from the Ribbon. Most computer screens are wider than they are taller. The menu bar + ribbon takes up 1/5 of my screen so I turned it off ... permanently. Someone at MS didn't think this one through.
I really like the ribbon, but this is a really, really smart criticism that Microsoft needs to fix (or at least allow for a little more UI flexibility)
Let's be honest, you're just USED to doing something the old archaic way that was invented decades ago. The file system is stupid and the iOS way of handling it is modern and more intuitive but you're never going to like anything better if you think just being used to something makes it better.
I'll say this: when you're working in single apps, Apple's approach to file management is brilliant. When you open Pages or Numbers, you don't have to go digging through folders to find what you want. They're all right there in front of you, all organized and grouped in an efficient, easy to find format.
...but when you're working with multiple files amongst multiple applications, it blows. Having to import and export files from one app to the next is sloppy, time consuming, and inefficient.
As old as the fold structure is, I haven't seen anything yet that's replaced its functionality entirely.
For "light" users I might agree, but we business users (writers, graphic designers, image enhancers, photographers, and other business folks who have clients) organize our projects of one or more files as billable jobs/projects e.g. by customer, job number, or date created-- or usually a combination of these attributes as nested folders. We may have 100 or many more client folders with various file formats within project folders that are within client folders.
The same goes for archived projects which may be on an archive server, which for some folks I know can number in the thousands. It's much easier for us to find the client folder and then look for date or job number or project name. To serve our clients well, it's worth keeping project folders for a really long time. I just got an order that was an update of a 1998 project, a rare thing but hey, my customer is happy.
We may not use a cloud service for old work, but we like to be consistent in our filing methods. I've been okay so far for App-only file organization, but iPads in particular will soon do work formerly only done on desktops.
We all, myself included, should take care to not project our personal usage as a universal way to do things.
I know what you mean but that solution has already been resolved in using tags. It's not all the way there yet because on iOS the tagging system hasn't yet been made obvious but in Yosemite tagging is front and center and it will continue to receive more prominence over folders over time in the interface. Tags fix the problem of multiple files amongst multiple applications being accessible in one "location".
Good move for Microsoft. I trust the privacy and security of iCloud more than Dropbox although Dropbox still seems to sync up faster than iCloud.
I have gone through the comments on this thread and see a common theme: everyone is arguing based on their personal needs. Both iWork and MS Office have their advantages and disadvantages. Below is my pet list based on my own needs and wants.
Advantages of iWork:
- Free on all platforms.
- Sufficient for most business purposes and virtually all personal ones.
- The UI is elegantly designed, simple to use and wonderfully uncluttered.
- Uses a side bar which saves headspace on smaller/portable screens like my Mackbook 13" Retina.
Disadvantages of iWork:
- Fewer features than MS Office.
- Slower to boot up on non-OS machines and may be completely unusable in many Fortune 500 company IT environments (mine included).
- Requires added steps to export to the industry standard formats of MS Office.
- No "paste as unformatted text" option for Numbers. This means reformatting ... time and time again ... anything you copy/paste from a differently formatted doc, like a webpage.
- No "Ctrl + D" option to pull data from the cell above (pet peeve).
- iOS Pages does not have "reflow" so I'm forced to constantly scroll right and left to read an entire sentence.
- iWork files are bigger than MS Offices by as much as 300%. Becomes a noticeable problem when syncing with little signal like at my office.
Advantages of MS Office:
- It is the industry standard for most businesses and the U.S. government.
- It has more potentially useful features than you'll probably ever know existed, let alone actually use.
- It may not be free, but you probably already have a functional copy of the program for Mac anyway.
- Word for iOS has "reflow" so that I'm not forced to constantly scroll right and left to read an entire sentence.
- Document sizes are one third the size of iWork files so they sync faster. This is a terribly useful feature in the black hole of an office I work inside (I'm convinced that the walls are lined with lead or whatever it is that blocks my signal).
- Excel lets me do amazing things that I either can't or just don't know how to do in Numbers.
Disadvantages of MS Office:
- It costs money.
- In a handful of years the 2011 versions we have will no longer be supported and we may have to decide if we want to shell out $100 a year for the new version. The alternative will be to get used to life with iWork and all the headache of remembering to export to a MS Office version, not to mention worrying if the document will retain its formatting.
- It suffers from the Ribbon. Most computer screens are wider than they are taller. The menu bar + ribbon takes up 1/5 of my screen so I turned it off ... permanently. Someone at MS didn't think this one through.
- It needs a less cluttered interface: there are so many features to manage that it is easy to get lost. Maybe it would help to have a basic, mid-level and advanced selection of options, instead of stuffing a ribbon so full.
- It is a Microsoft product. I'm an Apple fanboy and I don't like MS on principle (much like rooting for your favorite team, this is completely irrational, but then again, I'm only human).
At the end of the day, to each their own. Personally, I doubt that iWork will ever go away: someone much more astute than me (kds1 maybe?) once said that iWork is insurance against Microsoft pulling support for MS Office from Apple platforms, leaving Mac & iOS users high and dry.
Hi Tim. Have a fun time hobnobbing at the Grammys?
----------
Don't you make any money at your job?
I know what you mean but that solution has already been resolved in using tags. It's not all the way there yet because on iOS the tagging system hasn't yet been made obvious but in Yosemite tagging is front and center and it will continue to receive more prominence over folders over time in the interface. Tags fix the problem of multiple files amongst multiple applications being accessible in one "location".
----------
We use iWork primarily for our business which revolves around client projects. And we have created a tagging system that works far better than the old folder system did. Mainly because tags allow far more flexibility than folders. Apple's file system is heavily dependent on switching your filing system to being more based on tags... with folders only serving as strictly defined top level organization. And this is exactly what folders are best used for. The deeply nested folder system with the classic issue of "what folder does this go in?" is completely resolved by Apple's tagging system combining with the new app based folder system with shallow subfolders.
Very well written peace. Since I don't use many functions of Excel and even Word, existing set of features of Numbers is good enough for me. It may be not enough for some business use, but probably mostly macros and scripts thats are missed. As for Pages and Keynote, i think that most business needs are met as well.
office apps for ios do not appear to support saving new files created in app to icloud. You can only edit and (automatically) save existing files. If i'm wrong, and i hope i am, i'd like proof. Otherwise, this is an only mildly useful addition.