Microsoft is a platform company defending an operation system monopoly. They couldn't care less about software or hardware, all they care about is dominance. With Android as a free alternative, you can't have paid-for Windows as a big player in mobile. Doing Surface hardware is a way for Microsoft to get paid at all and bundling Office with Surface is a way to create consumer interest in Surface. If it fails, than Windows has failed as a tablet OS.Microsoft are a software company. Forgetting that would hurt them. Binding their software to hardware nobody wants anymore would hurt them too.
What're the features I'm missing out on by using iWork instead of Office.
iWork is compatible with office files, and features like Auto Save, Versions and iCloud syncing are impossible to go without.
Im sure it will arrive.With Microsofts typical lack of quality.Crashing, bugs, locking up.Why anyone buys anything from them I find mind boggling.
Joelist can you please send a memo to the higher ups?
The majority large corporations (Microsoft's enterprise clients) will not allow their employees to use it, especially if tied to O365. Multinational corporations are subject to EAR and ITAR export restrictions which do not permit the electronic export of certain types of information without an export license or export designation. This means any information transmitted over the internet is technically considered an export since you have no control over how the information is routed across the globe or where the servers are located.
So that limits the potential market to consumers and small business that are ignorant of US and international export laws. So if MS ties O for iOS to an O365 subscription, what consumer would be willing to shell out their hard earned cash when there are so many free alternatives? For example iWork, Google Docs, LibreOffice for iPad (which also uses Google Docs). O for iOS/iPad will be DOA.
MS please stop trying to transform into a mobile company. You are not a mobile/portable hardware company. You are not a mobile OS company. You were asleep at the wheel when the mobile revolution happened and now you look like a headless chicken with no clear direction. Concentrate on your profitable enterprise customers and making your desktop applications better on Windows and Mac OS.
This is not correct. It is exactly those large enterprises that are flocking to Office 365.
I'm going to guess split keyboard mode. It's somewhat glitchy and you have some extra options (docking, switch layouts) if you long-press the bottom-right "keyboard goes away button" (for lack of a better name).
Office is a huge card in Microsofts hand. Releasing Office for iPad is going to hurt them. One less reason to buy a surface.
That´s why they try to break loose with the standalone Office. Everything online, monthly/yearly subscriptions, you only need to update the backend to include new features.Compatibility with desktop Office? Don't count on it.
Large enterprises have some sense of security and they won´t ever allow Office 365 to be used on such a broad scale.This is not correct. It is exactly those large enterprises that are flocking to Office 365. And we do exchange information using it over national boundaries regularly with zero legal issues. And it is stuff like LibreOffice and especially Google Docs that a lot of large IT units have banned from their enterprises because of the huge security issues.
Not sure why you would allow Offcie 365 and not Google Docs, as they´re technically both Cloud-based services.
I don't think my higher ups would care, I don't work in the software industry. Want to stop the nonsense already?
Oh, and the right way to say it is BAD productivity software is free with the OS.
----------
This is not correct. It is exactly those large enterprises that are flocking to Office 365. And we do exchange information using it over national boundaries regularly with zero legal issues. And it is stuff like LibreOffice and especially Google Docs that a lot of large IT units have banned from their enterprises because of the huge security issues.
You need to take off your ABM colored glasses and look at the real world where people who need to be productive want the best of breed. And that (whether you like it or not) is Office.
That´s certainly true, but if you want to share (and that´s what he talked about) you need to use some online drive, which - in this case - is called SkyDrive/OneDrive. And that´s where the problem really begins. Otherwise it wouldn´t make much sense to use Office 365 and just go with the standalone applications, because sharing across organizations would then work via SSL-VPN/dial-up access to their intranet.Office 365 is cloud based in the same way Creative Cloud is, which is...not really all that cloud based. When you subscribe to it, you're more or less getting a month to month license for Office 2013 along with a whole bunch ofSkyOnedrive space.
That´s certainly true, but if you want to share (and that´s what he talked about) you need to use some online drive, which - in this case - is called SkyDrive/OneDrive. And that´s where the problem really begins.
Where are your numbers to show large enterprises are flocking to O360?
Yes, usage of the drive is optional, but the problem is that you have to do some preparations for Office 365 to work correctly, otherwise (like I added above) there would be no need to even buy it in the first place.I haven't played with 365 much myself, but I think that's entirely optional. Like you can still do normal collaboration projects the same as before, but now you have an option to Save to Skydrive.
Exactly. And for big legal firms or companies who have a sense of IT security, this is a no-go. That´s why you usually use VPN dial-up access, where firewalls often times even forbid you to copy files out of the intranet, but only give you a workable copy while connected, called data leakage prevention.As for Skydrive itself, it's no worse than saving to iCloud or Dropbox. It's not something I'd use for sensitive documents and materials, but for most anything else, it's fine.