Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't know if anyone else has posted this, but it shows Windows 8 pre beta running on a Mac.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaAQGPcbVlo&feature=topvideos_science

What's the point of using the Metro UI for heavy multitasking? It's always in full-screen mode and you don't get the dock-bar? I'd be in "Classic Windows" mode all the time anyways. I'm more likely to get Windows 8 for the "under the hood" improvements for my desktop PC and use Metro UI on a tablet. Metro UI is just too dumbed-down for proper desktop use. Just like I wouldn't use iOS on a Mac.
 
I'm more likely to get Windows 8 for the "under the hood" improvements for my desktop PC and use Metro UI on a tablet. Metro UI is just too dumbed-down for proper desktop use. Just like I wouldn't use iOS on a Mac.

This is about what I'm thinking. I'm pretty much equating the new start menu with my experiences using the Zune media player. When I first fired it up, I thought it would be a great interface for a tablet, but it was far from being the most optimal experience with a mouse. It felt way too floaty to me, and the overly largeness of everything felt like such a huge waste of space. It's better to do more with less, than less with more, no matter how pretty the end results are.

In short, they shouldn't give us the same UI on two devices with vastly different input methods for the simple the sake of homogeneity. They should instead give us one that looks and behaves similarly so you have an easy transition between the two, but with features more tailored to their specific platforms. If you're on a tablet, then the Metro UI is fine as is. But on a desktop, where we have much larger screens at much higher resolutions? Here's what I think would work:

Smaller tiles would make alot more sense to me. 32x32 for app launch icons, bigger ones can be used for your more animated tiles. You should be able to easily separate your tiles into specific groups across the screen for easy access and visual identification. Allow for multiple charms to be docked along the side, such as a twitter feed, a search charm, and a list of your currently active applications. Do it right, and it'd be like the old start menu, your widgets, your gadgets, the launchpad, and mission control all Metro'd up and accessible from a single click of the windows key. Everything I've seen of the current Metro UI shows it's more than capable of handling this. It just doesn't in its current state. It's too focused on the whole touch big stuff on a small screen paradigm.

So yeah. I'm hoping that what we're seeing now is nowhere near the final start menu design, and is only shoehorned in as is so developers can get a feel for how W8 will handle on tablets. In the end, I think the concept of Metro on the desktop isn't a bad one, but it needs alot more tweaking before it'll be a comfortable fit with the Windows desktop.
 

How much time have you spent with the pre beta? I used it for an hour or so running it in Parallels and I think it has the potential to be an outstanding tablet os. Of course I'm open minded, so I don't fit the norm here.

----------

Thanks!! Hilarious and so true. I see things have not changed. ;)

How much have you played with the pre beta? If you spent more than 5 seconds you will see that Metro is unlike any prior Windows interface so saying nothing has changed is ludicrous.
 
How much time have you spent with the pre beta? I used it for an hour or so running it in Parallels and I think it has the potential to be an outstanding tablet os. Of course I'm open minded, so I don't fit the norm here.

Uh, I have never touch a Wind'ohs device in my life(that includes Intel Macs) so I have no experience, but based on the pictures and videos I have seen it looks just as bad as the other version imho.
 
Uh, I have never touch a Wind'ohs device in my life(that includes Intel Macs) so I have no experience, but based on the pictures and videos I have seen it looks just as bad as the other version imho.

Just what I would have suspected. Carry on.
 
No problem downloading, but I can't get t to install on the wife's netbook 2 gigs of ram or the kids system, with 2 gigs of ram.
I just get the :( sad face thing on both!
:(
 
Who needs experience when you have photos

I could tell I didn't like the iPhone 4S when I saw the pics of the one that was partially assembled. I wasn't crazy about the colors of the internal components. They just don't have that Apple style.
 
Just what I would have suspected. Carry on.
exactly because I am a machead and would never soil my Mac with MS software let alone x86 cpu from intel. I have my choice/beliefs and you all have yours now all I ask for is to be respected because I enjoy being a machead and rather not use something I don't agree with. Thanks.
 
exactly because I am a machead and would never soil my Mac with MS software let alone x86 cpu from intel. I have my choice/beliefs and you all have yours now all I ask for is to be respected because I enjoy being a machead and rather not use something I don't agree with. Thanks.

You make it sound like a religion! Surely there are more important things in life to fixate on?
 
exactly because I am a machead and would never soil my Mac with MS software let alone x86 cpu from intel. I have my choice/beliefs and you all have yours now all I ask for is to be respected because I enjoy being a machead and rather not use something I don't agree with. Thanks.

Ooof.
Why so much coolaid? Windows 8 is a nice product, I have it and it runs great (on my MBA btw).
Try it, you'll like it -hey Mikey!
 
Ooof.
Why so much coolaid? Windows 8 is a nice product, I have it and it runs great (on my MBA btw).
Try it, you'll like it -hey Mikey!

You are thinking of fanboys/girls who overdid it on the coolaid. I on the other hand am a real Machead, which will criticize Apple when they do something I feel is wrong or lacking vs the competitors; hence why I don't(and never will) own an Intel Mac, a color screened iPod(unless you count the iPhone), or any of their older mouses. In all seriousness, I'd rather eat a really bad meal than try any MS OS.
 
You are thinking of fanboys/girls who overdid it on the coolaid. I on the other hand am a real Machead, which will criticize Apple when they do something I feel is wrong or lacking vs the competitors; hence why I don't(and never will) own an Intel Mac, a color screened iPod(unless you count the iPhone), or any of their older mouses. In all seriousness, I'd rather eat a really bad meal than try any MS OS.

Do you still travel by horse and buggy? You're non Intel Mac is getting long in the tooth. It's survival of the fittest. Check our Darwin.
 
You are thinking of fanboys/girls who overdid it on the coolaid. I on the other hand am a real Machead, which will criticize Apple when they do something I feel is wrong or lacking vs the competitors; hence why I don't(and never will) own an Intel Mac, a color screened iPod(unless you count the iPhone), or any of their older mouses. In all seriousness, I'd rather eat a really bad meal than try any MS OS.

You don't need "why" after "hence".
 

Nice find - too bad you had to go back more than three years (April 2008) to find an article that compared a 2.4 GHz Apple against a 2.0 GHz Gateway and came up with the conclusion that the Apple was faster.

homer-doh.jpg
 
Nice find - too bad you had to go back more than three years (April 2008) to find an article that compared a 2.4 GHz Apple against a 2.0 GHz Gateway and came up with the conclusion that the Apple was faster.


Considering Windows XP still dominates the Windows market it should really come as no surprise. :rolleyes:

Forrester Research Reveals Windows XP Still Dominates Business PCs
http://www.itproportal.com/2011/06/...eals-windows-xp-still-dominates-business-pcs/

Windows 7 Surpasses Vista, XP Still Dominates
http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/operating_systems/226500111

Report: Windows XP Still Dominates U.S. PCs
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Windows-XP-Vista-Windows-7-StatCounter,11210.html

Here you go.

11 Inch Macbook Air Runs Windows 7 Better Than Any Other Netbook
http://gadgetizor.com/macbook-air-runs-windows-7-better-than-any-other-netbook/6104/
 
Considering Windows XP still dominates the Windows market it should really come as no surprise. :rolleyes:

Forrester Research Reveals Windows XP Still Dominates Business PCs
http://www.itproportal.com/2011/06/...eals-windows-xp-still-dominates-business-pcs/

Windows 7 Surpasses Vista, XP Still Dominates
http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/operating_systems/226500111

Report: Windows XP Still Dominates U.S. PCs
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Windows-XP-Vista-Windows-7-StatCounter,11210.html


Here you go.

11 Inch Macbook Air Runs Windows 7 Better Than Any Other Netbook
http://gadgetizor.com/macbook-air-runs-windows-7-better-than-any-other-netbook/6104/

MacBook Air is not a netbook! Though I wonder how it may be a surprise when it's running better hardware
 
Last edited:
Considering Windows XP still dominates the Windows market it should really come as no surprise. :rolleyes:

So, you have to show reports from June and August 2.010 and Business Computers?

Have you read your own links?

11 Inch Macbook Air Runs Windows 7 Better Than Any Other Netbook
http://gadgetizor.com/macbook-air-runs-windows-7-better-than-any-other-netbook/6104/


Ooooohhh, really? A C2D computers runs faster than Atom computers? I never would imagine that :p
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.