Getting it to run and having a good user experience can be quite a chore and at times impossible with an older machine, depending on the specs. There are problems with sleep mode, not coming out of sleep mode, features that won't work or work properly etc.
Well, if thats the case, then they probably had hardware issues or didn't install the right drivers. Windows Update will get the proper drivers for the vast majority of hardware, so all you have to do is run that.
+1 Good to see someone on this forum who can cut through all the Anti-Windows BS
Before long you'll see plenty of posts calling me a troll
Have to agree there. WMC works very very well. There are also some very nice plugins that make it almost "Apple" like in its slick and "just works".
Just a shame they screwed up WHS and did not allow tuners to run on them. then they would have had an awesome home media setup.
Yeah that would have been.
I love WMC. It's great. Especially if you have an Xbox 360 and an HDTV tuner. Record shows and stream them to your Xbox. Or live TV. No need to pay extra for DVR service.
It's not whether Windows 7 will run on a 5 year old machine... it's that who would spend $179 for a copy of Windows 7 for a machine that old?
It wouldn't even be worth it to put a cheap OEM or upgrade copy of Windows 7 on a machine that old either.
Why would I spend $179? Windows 7 x64 Home Premium OEM is $99. Thats a full version. Just no technical support from MS and its "locked" to the motherboard its installed on, but not even MS will enforce that rule.
And these days a 5 year old machine could be a Core 2 Quad with 4GB of RAM and a GeForce 8800GTX. Nothing wrong with that setup at all! Will run modern games at very good settings and resolutions and eat up any other task you throw at it and ask for more. Throw a GTX 460, 560, or better in it and it'll run modern games at highest settings at highest resolutions at 60 frames or more.
Even a 5 year old Core 2 Duo and lesser non-Intel GPU from that time will be good enough to run Windows 7, provided it has at least 2GB of RAM.
Seems people have forgotten what kind of hardware we had a few years ago. Just because Apple still sells Core 2 Duos doesn't mean they're new. They're half a decade old!
The Core i7 brand itself is nearing 3 years old.
The Core 2 Duo revision in the MacBook and MacBook Air is 3 years old as well.
A lot of our "modern" technology is quite old. The graphics processor in the iPhone 4 is 4 years old. The GPU in the "Apple A5" was announced in January 2009. So yeah..
I actually like Windows, I love XP and 7. Windows 8 looks terrible, it looks like a hybrid OS that does not know what it is, the tiles and the whole metro UI is horrible.
Phones and tablets are toys, desktops and laptops are serious devices and should remain as such, made for a mouse and a keyboard. Apple has a good chance to snap many Windows fans.
Microsoft can't seem to be doing anything right lately, they make things work smooth and seemingly look nice buy people aren't falling for it.
And we have another that didn't read the article or watch the video. The "standard/classic/traditional" Aero UI is still in Windows 8. You can switch instantly too it and run it just like you do Windows 7 now. The new UI is for touch applications, but you can use it with a mouse and keyboard if you'd like.
I think it's great that Microsoft have taken a risk with the new UI. There's no point if Apple is the leader in this and that all the time - there NEEDS to be competition.
When was the last time Apple had a new Mac OS UI? Or even updated it beyond color changes?
When was the last time iOS UI was updated? Seriously haha. The iOS UI is the way it is because it made sense at the time. Now we know better and its in desperate need of updates, especially notifications, and Apple isn't doing it.