Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I was recently in a mall (Yorkdale Mall in Toronto) and amused to see the Apple Store and Microsoft Store almost side-by-side. So, I thought, OK, let's go laugh at the Microsoft Store.

I sat down and played with a Windows RT tablet. I probably spent 20 minutes playing with it. And you know what? I was pretty impressed.

There are some quirks, and some usability issues as compared to the iPad (you pretty much need the touch keyboard, Win RT is obviously optimized for NOT using the on-screen keyboard) but as a tablet that could run Office and get work done, this could be a strong contender. I'd wait until the next major OS update, because there are definitely glitches, but the potential is there.

In fact, I'd go so far as to say that I would choose a Windows 8 tablet over Android.

I really like the idea of a tablet running "full" Windows 8 that I could run my desktop apps with, but like others I am concerned about battery life. Tablets have spoiled me for 8-10+ hour battery life, and the Pro apparently only gets about half that.

Were you paid to post this Tim? Eh? ;)

p.s. Free Coupons?
 
Tablets like this new Surface Pro, or like the Samsung Ativ Pro, which can run a complete OS, are going to be successful. A colleague bought an Ativ Pro last week, and the rest of the office wants one. Well, except me because I consider the MacBook Air a better machine, but, anyway I believe Apple will lose an opportunity if they don't release "touch OSX". I cannot do my work on iOS, I really need OSX for work, and it would be great to have it on a touch screen.
 
Your biggest problem was you used Metro apps on a mouse based desktop machine. You don't have to do that. They're just there for you if you want to use them.

...which I do for a couple of things. I like being able to watch Netflix without having to install Silverlight.

As far as the desktop goes, it's not vastly different than 7. When I upgraded to 8 (which I did because it was cheap, I'll admit), my usual workflow barely changed at all. It's still the same basic Windows on that front.

I agree with you for the most part, except that the Modern apps are registered as the default views for a lot of file types. I installed Windows 8 on my old netbook mainly for the improvement in boot time, and it will not run Modern apps due to the resolution being below 1024x768. I knew that going in.

After using it for a few months I've hit a couple annoying snags when trying to listen to voicemail messages emailed as WAV files, viewing PDF documents, and a few other types. There are a number of actions which seem very sensable in Desktop mode that immediately try to throw you Modern mode (but then fail on a netbook). Similar things can happen when trying to change settings.

For the most part you can ignore the Modern apps, but they do have a tendency to try to switching context on you every once and a while. On a normal machine it wouldn't bother me too much, but the resolution error is annoying and frequent enough I'll probably go back to Windows 7 at some point.
 
Skip.... to what? Are you suggesting that there's going to be a Windows 9? Because at this point, I kinda doubt it.

Of course there will be a Windows 9 or whatever it will be called when it is released in the next 3-4? years.
 
I never thought I'd say this but I am actually hoping MS can get some of their mojo back. I would rather have a good solid US company as my main competitor than a bunch of Asian companies coupled with an evil data mining company.

Besides, SJ and BG did have mutual admiration for each other.
 
They emphasize hardware for retail sales, but I disagree when it comes to their profit on the apps. They still make money off of free apps. There's plenty of advertisements they get from them. 30% off of 99 cents is not much, or even 30% off of $1.99 is not much. However, we are seeing more in app purchases, and more apps that cost more. Even apps like Pandora who links to iTunes will add to Apple's profits. It's a slow but steady cash flow.

But we know from the quarterly reports, its a very small part of Apple's profits, much smaller then what they make from sales of iPhones, iPads, iPods and even Macs.
 
Everything here is good but the price. At $499 the ipad or surface rt is an addition to something else. At $899, that is very well your only computer.

Needed to be $599 or $699.

At $899 this isn't going to be your only computer. Once you add a keyboard cover you get closer, but I really want to see how much storage is left on the 64G model before saying it's really capable of acting as a daily driver.

I am very interested in the Yoga 11S when it comes out, though. Lower price point, built in keyboard, full x86 processor like the Surface Pro. If only it was available before June.
 
I'm sure the 5 minutes you spent with Windows 8 was absolute hell for you.



It could use some spit shine and fine tuning, but it's hardly unusable. Once you learn where all the new stuff is, it's not vastly different than what came before.

It all really comes down to how much you like having a fullscreen start menu. That's about the biggest difference between it and 7 if you ask me.

Windows 8 sucks! I have it and I've spent plenty of time using it. My family who are Windows users would have a much easier time switching over to Mac OS than to deal with Windows 8. Not only is it a pain from a day to day usability standpoint but for example, Windows 8 can now view PDF's by nature of the system like Mac OS, but it only runs through the stupid Tiles UI. If I download a PDF to the desktop then it opens up through the Metro UI. Dumb. Don't let me get started about the stupid method to access the sleep and shutdown buttons. And all this is just the small crap.
 
This chart shows a single $499 price for the iPad but gives a RANGE of storage options and multiple networking options. It should give a price range.

And this Surface Pro looks completely pointless. Just Microsoft seeing analysts claiming that PCs are going to die soon (not true), getting a laptop, making it a little worse, adding a touch screen, and branding it as a tablet. What a joke. And as a general rule, it's not a good idea to buy anything from MS for $899.
 
I don't get this thing. It looks like they took some good ideas but jumbled them together into something that is somehow less than the sum of its parts. I can't imagine choosing this over either an iPad or a MacBook Air (or even one of the many Wndows clones of it). I'm sure they'll sell a few million of these but MS bet the company on it and I don't see this pulling them out of their slow downward spiral.

The promise of the Surface Pro is that it's a laptop and tablet in one… but I don’t know any people who use a 10.6" laptop as their only machine.

That's where it falls apart with me.
 
Anandtech chart is flawed....

Why the comparison with the iPad only ? Surely a fairer comparison would be between the surface pro and the MacBook Air 11" stock.


MBA
11-inch : 64GB
1.7GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 processor
Turbo Boost up to 2.6GHz
4GB memory
64GB flash storage1
Intel HD Graphics 4000
1376x768 Resolution

$999.00


SurfacePro
10.1"
Dual Core i5 processor
4GB memory
64GB flash storage
Intel HD Graphics 4000
1920x1080

Touch Cover & Surface Pen accessories included.

$899

Brilliant!

A fairer comparison would be iPad vs Surface RT, not against something that has a desktop OS.
 
Looks good but, why a non-Apple product appears on MR?

My thoughts exactly. Although I'm new here I've been lurking for years and MR is really no longer a news site for Apple enthusiasts, it's become just another tech site and sadly Apple gets the bad end of the stick around here as far as the haters that love this place.
 
I'd be interested in knowing the expected battery life. With a Core i5 and a smaller battery than an iPad, it can't be great.

17W CPU, 24Wh battery. Is that 17W at 100% usage? I guess. So assuming 10% usage is about 1.7W (probably more due to overhead), the battery can power the processor by itself at 10% usage for 14.11 hours. Then you add the bigger screen and stuff, and it won't be good.

I don't claim to know how processor power consumption works, so these calculations are probably wrong, but whatever.
 
This chart shows a single $499 price for the iPad but gives a RANGE of storage options and multiple networking options. It should give a price range.

And this Surface Pro looks completely pointless. Just Microsoft seeing analysts claiming that PCs are going to die soon (not true), getting a laptop, making it a little worse, and branding it as a tablet. What a joke. And as a general rule, it's not a good idea to buy anything from MS for $899.

Why? Steve proclaimed that we were in the post pc era.
 
This will never succeed.

I got on the Windows RT bandwagon when it first dropped just to try it out, and it was really incredible at how less efficient (and thus productive) I was when using my Surface vs a regular laptop. The expensive keyboards were terrible, the kickstand is at a weird angle, can't sit on any surface that isn't hard like a table, windows 8 was very sluggish, no essential apps, syncing issues, bad UI. Just yuck. Needless to say I brought it right back to the store after trying to use it for a good 2 weeks.

I highly do not recommend any Windows 8 devices.
 
Yes, an OS thats 90% the same as Windows 7 is "usability hell".

If you have trouble using Widows 7 then you probably aren't much use to the world. Stick to video games.

Let's not forget that the Ipad is just an over-sized iPhone. If all you want to do i surf the web, and post on twitter you're clearly better off with the iPad. On the other hand, you'll be able to run real programs on the Surface.

As others have pointed out, comparing this to the mac-book air is more apt.
 
While I'm no fan of Windows 8, I do like the fact that it is available with 128GB, perhaps this will spur Apple etc to increase the storage on the iPad and iPhones.

The storage options for the iDevices are pretty badly priced. Apple overcharges for iPod memory as they do for PC RAM. Android devices let you use your own SD card. It's much cheaper that way, and you don't have to worry about buying a model with too little space and running out.

Still, 128GB? Who's going to need that much for a netbook? Then again, Win8 is a big installation.

----------

Why? Steve proclaimed that we were in the post pc era.

Steve was wrong. I'm using a PC right now, and so are my friends. Unless he meant that we're in a post only-using-PC era? Or if he meant "Windows" when he said "PC"? I'm pretty sure he didn't mean that.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.