Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
hmmm

I find alot of comments here amusing on both sides of the coin. I kept reading hoping i would find legitimate reasoning on either side. The endless posts going back and forth are ridiculous at best.

First let me qualify myself as being on neither side. I currently use an Iphone but also have a G1 from tmobile. I am mostly a mac user but also have windows and *nix machines under my care. I have used many different phone types and brands over the past years so while im surely not qualified as a phone expert I do know what i like.

That being said.

The bottom line here folks is that Apple DID NOT create the idea of an app store. The general delivery method IS NOT brand new. The type of installer used IS NOT new. The general installer concept as others on here have stated has been around since before 2000 in the linux community.
(need i say apt-get install foo or yum install foo or 'insert_your_favorite_package_manager_here install foo')

If all Apple has done here was a good marketing job then i would say*that the iphone app store will soon fade away since its just marketing and not backed up at all by proper implementation. I do not think we will see that happen anytime soon as I believe they have actually done a very good job with the app store on several levels and it shows with the number of people downloading apps. I hope that the other companies have the same success with their application delivery as well because such success is a wonderful thing for the user of the device. Not everyone can use an iphone and not everyone is suited to an iphone either so that leaves folks out there that would like the same kind of services with similar functionality on*their devices too....why should we force them to use an iphone.....perhaps they prefer tactile feedback when typing or they have no use for the touch screen ....ATT isnt available in their location or they simply prefer another carrier etc etc. The bottom line is competition and choice is good for us and good for the respective companies making the products as it forces them to keep on their toes to provide us with new features while driving the costs down as well.

Why should we waste time arguing over who is copying who ? That is something that happens in the mobile sector and technology sector day in and day out. Im sure that if you lay the products side by side the features will NOT be exactly the same therefore its not a duplicate but rather someone trying to improve on the idea or bring the same concept to a different platform.

I love my apple devices... I enjoy using my iphone and always find myself preferring it over my G1 or the blackberry i had. I have had an iphone since the 1st Gen and upgraded it when the 3G came out. I do not love it for the fact that its made by apple... I think that it is a well thought out device for the most part. I think their framework was done properly and the way the OS handles memory management is top notch for a mobile device (for expample if the app has a memory leak in it or it consumes too much memory the app terminates and your device remains usable) . I think that some (windows mobile especially) lack some of the core features that take away from the reliability that a mobile device needs to be considered a joy to use. Should i have to invoke a task manager to close an application on my device ? or should it just close when i click the close button ?

An idea is just that... its an idea. You can have the best idea in the world and no possible way to implement it. Why flame a company for using an idea that perhaps had a flawed implementation and improving on the idea some and using a plan for implementation that makes it successful ?

The bottom line is that no matter whether or not we like it ...the iphone is a success as well as the app store.

I think we get confused sometimes. I cannot find where Apple released a statement saying that it had the first 'App Store' for mobile devices anywhere. I also cannot find anywhere that Apple has released a statement saying they have the first touch screen enabled phone. If i am mistaken i would love to read the release.

Also for those folks out there that think Apple created OSX from the ground up are also mistaken.... the core of OSX is BSD which has been around for many moons and that is why i am a OSX user to this day.
 
Yeah, I think the App Store is quite a bit more than a package manager. They also have to handle payment distribution (from 7 different regions, and many different currencies), business contracts, etc etc... no small feat. Of course, they already had the infrastructure for all this... iTunes. As plenty of people have pointed out.

Well there are more parts to the 'App Store' than we would believe. Part of it is an installer obviously since the application has to be installed on the phone as well as do compatibility checks to allow the application to be installed. the other part as you mentioned is a web service that handles user submission of applications. CC transactions etc etc. Similar to what Click n Run was to Linspire. It also allowed for transactions / reviews / searching / submission and installation of software utilizing dpkg and apt as the backend fetch and install software that was originally created by the Debian Project.
 
I cannot find where Apple released a statement saying that it had the first 'App Store' for mobile devices anywhere. I also cannot find anywhere that Apple has released a statement saying they have the first touch screen enabled phone. If i am mistaken i would love to read the release.

There are more than two sides to the discussion. The quote above shows that third side.
 
The bottom line here folks is that Apple DID NOT create the idea of an app store. The general delivery method IS NOT brand new. The type of installer used IS NOT new. The general installer concept as others on here have stated has been around since before 2000 in the linux community.
(need i say apt-get install foo or yum install foo or 'insert_your_favorite_package_manager_here install foo')

*sigh*

Ok, I'll bite. I've created a Linux package and someone installs it in Russia (I'm in the US) using apt-get or yum or whatever the hell redhat uses... now I've put a price on my app of $.99. How do I get paid, using Linux's model that everyone here claim exists.

Oh sure, as a user I'd LOVE everything to be free. As a developer though, its kinda neat seeing money come into my bank account after working for weeks on my application and not having to worry about international wire transfers if some dude in Russia or Japan or wherever wants to use my app.

Seriously, someone farted into a mic and made enough money to buy a freaking house. How do you do that using a package manager?
 
What I'm getting at is Apple wasn't the first and the App Store wasn't even their idea, yet lots of people on this forum seem to think that all these other companies are "copying Apple." This simply is not true.
They may not be copying the execution of the App Store (which I'll leave to others to debate its originality), but the perception is that they are trying to copy the success of the App Store with their "me-too" offerings.
 
All y'all folks thinking to y'all selves that Apple is trendsetter; no they are not; the App Store is actually a roughly put together store modeled after their music store; unfortunately Apps change and music doesn't, so Apple does not have a system to implement said changes yet.

As with the whole App store idea, Handango has been around for a long time and I've bought stuff from them for a long time. Never had a problem; never needed to "jailbreak" my phone to install a few applications. It was a simple "Allow unsigned apps" and then I could install anything I want.

These new stores are just an integration and improvement on Apple's model, but it's a misconception that they are copying Apple; if anything Apple has been copying other manufacturers for a long time.
 
This is going to be hilarious.

Once the various stores have competed with each other (and Apple) to be the "most open" by allowing any old rubbish to be sold (because they will) and their users start downloading everything in sight (because they will) expect to read of "smart" phones of every other OS groaning and crashing under the weight of background processes.

Not to mention the next wave of smut in the mobile realm and viruses :p
 
All y'all folks thinking to y'all selves that Apple is trendsetter; no they are not; the App Store is actually a roughly put together store modeled after their music store; unfortunately Apps change and music doesn't, so Apple does not have a system to implement said changes yet.

How so? The automatic updates work fine on my phone.
 
Can't they just make one universal App Store.

At most there'd be two. One for the iPhone and Mac users. And another for every other phone out there with universal applications that are written and coded for all mobile OS smartphones and regular phones.

And people would still call it junk since it won't have an Apple logo.
 
At most there'd be two. One for the iPhone and Mac users. And another for every other phone out there with universal applications that are written and coded for all mobile OS smartphones and regular phones.

And people would still call it junk since it won't have an Apple logo.

But the Windows Mobile apps wouldn't work on, say, the Palm Pre so there would have to be three.

The Palm Pre uses their own web based OS so that would be four.

Blackberry uses their own proprietary SDK so that would be five....

So it would probably end up being... pretty much the way it is today. :)
 
*sigh*

Ok, I'll bite. I've created a Linux package and someone installs it in Russia (I'm in the US) using apt-get or yum or whatever the hell redhat uses... now I've put a price on my app of $.99. How do I get paid, using Linux's model that everyone here claim exists.

Oh sure, as a user I'd LOVE everything to be free. As a developer though, its kinda neat seeing money come into my bank account after working for weeks on my application and not having to worry about international wire transfers if some dude in Russia or Japan or wherever wants to use my app.

Seriously, someone farted into a mic and made enough money to buy a freaking house. How do you do that using a package manager?

Did i say I wanted everything to be free ? no ... in fact i sighted a source where they DO charge for apps on a linux system. Click n Run worked very well and was available for Linspire. I am a developer as well and have been for over 15 years and i do understand the need to get paid in some respect for your work. That being said I was simply proving the point that its not a new idea and has been done.... The app store serves a much larger audience and is implemented much better i will agree, but its not a new invention is what i was getting at. Its just done well and works nicely for those able to access it. I use it everyday myself.
FYI 'open source' doesnt mean free. and Linux doesnt necessarily mean free.... if the only reason you utilize linux is that its free then you use it for the wrong reason but thats another topic all together.

just wanted to add that you can get paid using the open source model its just not by directly selling the software itself unless you provide the source code as well.
 
Palm Started This - they are *not* following Apple!

What is wrong with Apple fanboys insisting the iPhone (yes, I love it) is the first to do anything? The Palm TX shipped with an app store where one could pay and download apps wireless into the Palm TX handheld. I bought that device 4 years ago! Do not act like Palm is following *anything* Apple has done, because Palm, albeit not anymore, was a leader and innovator in this field.
I keep thinking one day I'm going to open up Mac Rumors and see a post like, "iPhone first phone to make phone calls" or some stupid crap like that. I'm sick of misleading information saying Palm is following Apple! It's simply not true going back to the days of the Apple Newton- which licensed PIM software from - yep - Palm.
I guess to read an be an active part of this website you have to accept the fact that Steve Jobs invented electricity, sliced bread, and air itself? Ridiculous.
 
Did i say I wanted everything to be free ? no ... in fact i sighted a source where they DO charge for apps on a linux system. Click n Run worked very well and was available for Linspire. I am a developer as well and have been for over 15 years and i do understand the need to get paid in some respect for your work. That being said I was simply proving the point that its not a new idea and has been done.... The app store serves a much larger audience and is implemented much better i will agree, but its not a new invention is what i was getting at. Its just done well and works nicely for those able to access it. I use it everyday myself.
FYI 'open source' doesnt mean free. and Linux doesnt necessarily mean free.... if the only reason you utilize linux is that its free then you use it for the wrong reason but thats another topic all together.

Thanks, I know what Open Source is. I know Linux doesn't mean free. And I wasn't saying it was a new invention, merely pointing out the fact that it is simply an "app running on the iPhone" is wrong. And yes, I can write an app myself and sell it but not easily. Especially if I wanted to sell it outside of the US.

Click n Run is an implementation of online software sales, but since we're talking about stores on mobile phones its not really applicable.
 
All y'all folks thinking to y'all selves that Apple is trendsetter; no they are not; the App Store is actually a roughly put together store modeled after their music store; unfortunately Apps change and music doesn't, so Apple does not have a system to implement said changes yet.

As with the whole App store idea, Handango has been around for a long time and I've bought stuff from them for a long time. Never had a problem; never needed to "jailbreak" my phone to install a few applications. It was a simple "Allow unsigned apps" and then I could install anything I want.

These new stores are just an integration and improvement on Apple's model, but it's a misconception that they are copying Apple; if anything Apple has been copying other manufacturers for a long time.

The fact that something is made from parts invented or discovered by others does not preclude it from being "new" as a whole. Every invention or innovation is based on the what came before. Every part of the iPhone (multi-touch, etc) existed before the iPhone. It doesn't mean that the iPhone is not new or innovated.

Apple did not invent the concept of a store to sell mobile application. The did not invent the concept of an integrated installer for mobile applications. The did invent the concept of the "App Store." Before the Apple App Store there was no mobile application store that contained every single application that was available for the device with integrated installation, updates, purchasing, and developer payments with sync and backup to a dedicated desktop application.

All of these individual parts existed before App Store, but Apple "innovated" by putting them all together.

I haven't seen anything in the new app stores announced in this post (other than location awareness and less content restrictions) that isn't in the Apple App Store. I admit that I haven't looked at them that much, so I'd be happy to learn about anything that they do better or differently than Apple.
 
Thanks, I know what Open Source is. I know Linux doesn't mean free. And I wasn't saying it was a new invention, merely pointing out the fact that it is simply an "app running on the iPhone" is wrong. And yes, I can write an app myself and sell it but not easily. Especially if I wanted to sell it outside of the US.

Click n Run is an implementation of online software sales, but since we're talking about stores on mobile phones its not really applicable.

so your saying that the app store isnt online sales ?!?
of course it is... its the same concept. the app store is 'online sales' just like click n run or any*other application that allows you to purchase something in a similar fashion.... I agreed with you its more than an application running on the phone so no argument there.... it has been partially borrowed from the package management idea that many Linux distros use that was MY point. If its not online sales then you should be able to put your phone in airplane mode and purchase an application then.
 
so your saying that the app store isnt online sales ?!?
of course it is... its the same concept. the app store is 'online sales' just like click n run or any*other application that allows you to purchase something in a similar fashion.... I agreed with you its more than an application running on the phone so no argument there.... it has been partially borrowed from the package management idea that many Linux distros use that was MY point. If its not online sales then you should be able to put your phone in airplane mode and purchase an application then.

Where did I state that App Store isn't online sales? I said Click N Run wasn't a mobile phone storefront. And it isn't. We're talking about mobile phone storefronts on this thread. And the cohesion between developers posting their own goods for sale (such as Click N Run) and the mobile phone marketplace, as far as I know, is an innovation for Apple.

Click n Run is an implementation of online software sales, but since we're talking about stores on mobile phones its not really applicable.
 
But the Windows Mobile apps wouldn't work on, say, the Palm Pre so there would have to be three.

The Palm Pre uses their own web based OS so that would be four.

Blackberry uses their own proprietary SDK so that would be five....

So it would probably end up being... pretty much the way it is today. :)

True, but it was hypothetical. Like an, if it were to happen kinda thing.

The fact that something is made from parts invented or discovered by others does not preclude it from being "new" as a whole. Every invention or innovation is based on the what came before. Every part of the iPhone (multi-touch, etc) existed before the iPhone. It doesn't mean that the iPhone is not new or innovated.

Apple did not invent the concept of a store to sell mobile application. The did not invent the concept of an integrated installer for mobile applications. The did invent the concept of the "App Store." Before the Apple App Store there was no mobile application store that contained every single application that was available for the device with integrated installation, updates, purchasing, and developer payments with sync and backup to a dedicated desktop application.

All of these individual parts existed before App Store, but Apple "innovated" by putting them all together.

I haven't seen anything in the new app stores announced in this post (other than location awareness and less content restrictions) that isn't in the Apple App Store. I admit that I haven't looked at them that much, so I'd be happy to learn about anything that they do better or differently than Apple.

Great, so you agree that the Palm Pre is innovation then.

That's what I like to hear! :D
 
Where did I state that App Store isn't online sales? I said Click N Run wasn't a mobile phone storefront. And it isn't. We're talking about mobile phone storefronts on this thread. And the cohesion between developers posting their own goods for sale (such as Click N Run) and the mobile phone marketplace, as far as I know, is an innovation for Apple.
haha okay well the funny thing here is i was mixing things up just as you were when you brought linux into the discussion so i will assume that this applies to you and not me. i was speaking of the concept in general it doesnt matter what the device the application is delivered to the concept is the same and my point was that it has been done thats all and that some of the ideas Apple used for implementation has been borrowed from elsewhere... im not here to argue the subject to no end with you as i agree that its a wonderful product.... the concept is out there and has been for quite sometime and not in anyway new.
 
True, but it was hypothetical. Like an, if it were to happen kinda thing.

Actually it would be pretty sweet if Microsoft would release some sort of wrapper app for the iPhone that allowed you to run .NET Compact Framework apps on it. I can imagine how fast Apple's reject button would be for that app tho.
 
Great, so you agree that the Palm Pre is innovation then.

I'd appreciate you not putting words in my mouth. This thread and my post had nothing to do with the Palm Pre. That said, of course the Palm Pre has some innovative features such as the integrated calendar and contacts and the page view.

That's what I like to hear! :D

Why? :rolleyes:
 
Actually it would be pretty sweet if Microsoft would release some sort of wrapper app for the iPhone that allowed you to run .NET Compact Framework apps on it. I can imagine how fast Apple's reject button would be for that app tho.

Right. It'd be pretty cool if, like in the joke above, all mobile phone OS makers made certain code standard and allowed most apps programmed to be run on various types of phones. Or at least the soon to be big three (Symbian, WebOS, and Android).

The only company that would be completely against it would be of course, Apple.

I'd appreciate you not putting words in my mouth. This thread and my post had nothing to do with the Palm Pre. That said, of course the Palm Pre has some innovative features such as the integrated calendar and contacts and the page view.

I'd appreciate it if you calmed down, or just ignore me in the future, the later being the easiest for both of us and for the benefit and civility of the thread.

I wasn't putting words in your mouth, just using your own very sensible logic to see how far you'd carry your argument. There'd be many products that would be innovative based on what you said and defined as innovative.

I think you need to relax a bit. :rolleyes:
 
They actually speak Spanish in most of south America - including Uruguay with the notable exception of brazil (where they speak Portugese). Urugauyan doesn't exist.

Btw Handango has about 20000 Windows Mobile apps. But I don't think they all work on every phone.

Thanks for the correction on the language at uruguay, I suppose that makes your argument valid, you 'd think. As for windows mobile 20,000 apps you do seem like the win me type who'd go for, what's its name, handjob. We with apple at the app store will take the full service thank you very much.:D

Btw, quoting from that great roughly drafted link posted earlier (and you should all read roughly drafted):

http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/RDM.Tech.Q1.07/9FB758E7-CA6E-415F-828D-08F01471F6B5.html

Myth 16: Existing third party apps are very useful
What exactly are the "cutting edge, rich applications" ABI’s Solis thinks people are using on Windows Mobile, Palm, Symbian, and Linux smartphones? They simply don't exist! The mobile software market is a joke.

It's simply a myth that existing mobile phones offer some vast library of interesting and useful third party software. Take a look at websites offering mobile downloads for Windows Mobile, Palm OS, RIM, and Symbian. It's nearly all absolute crap! Most existing mobile apps fit into one of these pathetic categories:

•Software that solves problems that shouldn't exist

$110 of actual examples of popular Windows Mobile apps unnecessary on the iPhone:

•memory managers that squeeze apps into the tiny bit of RAM installed: MemMaid $15

•interface patches: SPB Pocket Plus $25

"The best selling system utility for Pocket PC. Winner of Pocket PC 2004 Awards as the best task manager. Powerful Today plug-in with tabs. Close button that really closes, etc."

•File manager: Virtual Explorer $25

"Virtual Explorer is a revolutionary and powerful integrated solution designed to replace the rather restricted features of the standard Pocket PC file explorer."

•System cleanup, clumsy workarounds: Pocket Mechanic Pro $25

“The ultimate Pocket PC maintenance utility comes re-loaded with features and tools to keep your device and storage cards in perfect shape. Pocket PC Magazine Best Software 2006 Finalist.”

•File backup: SPB backup $20


•Software that should have been provided by the vendor

$344 of actual examples of popular Windows Mobile apps included on the iPhone:

•Dashboard: WorldMate Pro $75
"world clocks and weather forecasts, flight and travel information"

•real email client: Pocket Informant $25
"replacement for Pocket Outlook on the Pocket PC"

•real web browser: none seem to exist.

•real contacts: Photo Contacts PRO $30

•Photo browser: Imageer $15

•iPod: Pocket Player MP3 player $20

•Movies: Pocket DVD studio $30


•TV: HandiTV $20 "watch TV from mobile devices"

•Dial up networking: PDANet $34 "use your mobile as a modem!"

•Calculator: Revolutionary Calculator $30

•Touch screen type input: Full Screen Keyboard $10

•PDF: PDF Reader $25

•Notes: List Pro $30 “Manage your notes”


•Software that is absurd
Real titles for Windows Mobile, Palm:

•Ring Tone Choosers
•Ghost Detectors
•Love Detectors
•Lie Detectors

•Propel - $25 "the ultimate launcher - you'll be amazed at how snappy and straightforward launching applications, finding contacts and keeping in touch will be."


•Software that is overpriced trash

A $92 selection of popular Palm OS titles already available for $15 on the iPod today:



•Texas Holdem $20 for Palm, next to the $5 iPod version, and the $8-$8.50 Verizon BREW version
•Bejeweled $20
•Pocket Tunes $37
•Sudoku $15

•Verizon Brew apps: crappy games and overpriced video clips and ringtones


•Software that will work on the iPhone

free, custom, alternative, open software

Oops, that's right folks: in their unbridled attempts to discredit the iPhone with third party app panic, analysts have seemed to overlook the fact that what passes for "third party apps" on most mobile phones is worthless, and most of what isn't can be put on the iPhone without any involvement or approval from Apple.

More on that in a moment, but first a look at why existing mobile apps are so worthless.

READ IT, THIS IS ALL LAUGH OUT LOUD FUNNY STAFF AND SO TRUE...UNLIKE WHAT THE HANDJOB GUYS WOULD HAVE US BELIEVE. HERE'S WHAT THE GREAT WIN ME AND HANDJOB HAVE BEEN SELLING: "Close button that really closes, etc." APP, YEAH YOU READ IT RIGHT AN APP USED TO ACTUALLY IMPLEMENT THE CLOSE BUTTON FUNCTIONALITY. GEE AND i WOULD OF THANK THAT MS WOULD HAVE FIGURED THIS OUT...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.