FWIW, Slack is also a website-in-a-frame that consumes a lot of memory.Is this an actual full replatforming?
MS teams for windows still looks like a ****** electron app using a gig of memory.
FWIW, Slack is also a website-in-a-frame that consumes a lot of memory.Is this an actual full replatforming?
MS teams for windows still looks like a ****** electron app using a gig of memory.
Some companies move to Teams away from Slack because of the costs of Slack vs Teams when you already have Microsoft 365 licenses for your staff.Companies use Teams because it comes along with Office. No one would ever compare Teams against Slack and decide to use Teams.
Only after WebView comes out on the Mac later this fallIt's a late move but thank god... It's on public preview now and the release will follow in september.
However the full replatforming out of electron is still not happening anytime soon...![]()
What am I missing? I downloaded the apple silicon MS Teams program and it shows up as an "Intel" app under activity monitor.
Same here. We had GotoMeeting before, and also Webex. I just had a ticket opened with Microsoft for an intermittent issue where video doesn't show for every participant in a meeting. The workaround is to leave the meeting and re-join. Microsoft support is unable to help because I can't provide a reproduction scenario. This issue isn't new, and many are complaining about it online. Yet, Microsoft is unable or unwilling to even diagnose the issue. Oh, I would like to go back to GotoMeeting, WebEx, or move to Slack which is even better.Exactly… our company 100% did this. Slack worked much better, but they didn’t want to pay for it when we got Teams for free. Teams has been a dumpster fire for most of us, but it’s a free dumpster fire so it’s what we have to use now.
yes, and still audio driver is Intel.
Yeah you know me so well. Thank you for determining my thoughts for me.That's a bit overreaction and you know it. My company uses Teams...not my first choice but that's the choice.
As if people working for major companies decide what software is being used by said company or the partners they're working with.Or, use Webex. It's had native Apple Silicon support for a long time and does not run on top of Electron.
Oh yeah that is a big pain. Why are there 3 places to look: chat, team, and activity? Sometimes a chat appears under activity and sometimes it doesn't and then I have to go hunt under chat.That's a choice. You must enjoy the cognitive overhead of trying to remember whether that conversation you were having before is in the Teams tab or the Chat tab because for some reason the app wants to highlight a seam between two fundamentally similar experiences.
My company is using teams for videoconferencing only, chat, channels and collaboration is done through slackCompanies use Teams because it comes along with Office. No one would ever compare Teams against Slack and decide to use Teams.
yup, same here, I hate teams with a passion but now I'm stuck with it. I miss slackExactly… our company 100% did this. Slack worked much better, but they didn’t want to pay for it when we got Teams for free. Teams has been a dumpster fire for most of us, but it’s a free dumpster fire so it’s what we have to use now.
Sure, but at least with slack I feel like it's worth it. Also it doesnt crash or just randomly lose its connection the way teams does so often
At least in the US HIPAA/FedRAMP/Financial auditing/etc depending on what part of the field also plays in, you have to pay more for higher tier versions of slack for the extra logging and audit functions for slack, if the company already has all the MS services it's cheaper than slack and integrates better into the IT/Security workflow.Regardless of how good another product works, most organizations will go the route of what's already paid for. I worked w/ devs and infrastructure groups, and the devs loved Slack and the infrastructure people couldn't have cared less, and since we already had M365, the devs lost.
The edict from above was unless you can show us tangible evidence, quickly and easily that Slack makes you more productive and it pays for itself, then we're going to use Teams. Needless to say, all are on Teams at this point.
Slack video conferencing is also a stuttery, buggy mess, so companies are usually looking for an alternative anyways.Some companies move to Teams away from Slack because of the costs of Slack vs Teams when you already have Microsoft 365 licenses for your staff.
Ah, that's what I did and that must have been the difference. I def remember checking that. So that's why we are fully AS maybe and others aren't. Nice find.
That's weird, I don't have Developer preview under About. I'm on 20352 manually downloaded from the GitHub page and when I check for updates, I don't get updated to 20858 or 21565.Not sure. I'm already on 20858. That's probably what it will put you on.
3 dots in the top right corner -> About -> Developer preview
EDIT: my MacBook Air M1 was on 20352 when I checked for updates just now. It updated to 21565 when I checked. I believe you'll get 20858 or 21565 when you enable developer previews.
Your Teams admins can block access to betas and previews, so that's probably why you aren't seeing the developer preview option.That's weird, I don't have Developer preview under About. I'm on 20352 manually downloaded from the GitHub page and when I check for updates, I don't get updated to 20858 or 21565.
Interesting. I don’t use Teams but I think our corporate and support folks use it.Companies use Teams because it comes along with Office. No one would ever compare Teams against Slack and decide to use Teams.
But at least Slack allows you to draw on other people’s shared screen. Unlike Teams which makes it very hard to “point” to a location in a remote screen.Slack video conferencing is also a stuttery, buggy mess, so companies are usually looking for an alternative anyways.