Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So it looks like it's not exclusive to Yahoo mail. I'd be pretty peeved if I got an iPhone and couldn't check my regular email accounts. I'm pretty sure Apple wouldn't do that to us. So maybe we don't have to worry about the quality of Yahoo's email going down - because most iPhone users will just use their regular email accounts anyway.

Yahoo is providing the push email services. I'd imagine that the iPhone could check other accounts, but you'd have to take the initiative to pull new emails from the server. If you go with Yahoo then, well, the emails are pushed out to you.
 
I don't understand...Why is it so bad that Microsoft is talking about buying Yahoo? Are all these people voting negative simply because they don't like Microsoft?:confused: :confused: :confused:

I don't see why this is such a huge deal. I can see the potential Yahoo iPhone conflicts but I am sure there will be a resolution.
 
It's not too easy to buy a company worth $147 billion (Google's approx. current market cap). Microsoft's market cap is about $292 billion. I don't believe Google would allow a Msft. takeover.

The largest merger ever (in the works) is the Barclay's taking over ABN Amro. That deal is worth $91 billion.

You see this post?

No chance of that these days. Google is worth $108bn against Apple's $86bn. In contrast Microsoft is worth $298bn against Yahoo's $44bn.

Google can't afford Apple.

$108 billion or $147 billion? Either way, that's a hunk of change. But, as I said, I don't know much about business. But, you're right Google probably wouldn't allow a M$ takeover.
 
I don't think the issue is wether this is technically feasable or not, but that Yahoo! has far more email users than Gmail or .Mac. If you are a regular user of Yahoo! mail then the iPhone's ability to do push mail is another reason to buy an iPhone. Apple gets to tap into a large user base with a value add for it's product. A Microsoft aquisition would certainly kill that.

I wonder if the users of yahoo mail are frequent email users though. I'd rather have the computer savy gmailers than the grandmas on yahoo mail. They aren't your market.
 
Although this is not Mac news. It would be bad news for Yahoo if it did happen. It makes you wonder if MS would keep the Yahoo brand or just take all their intellectual property and incorporated it with MSN and Hotmail.

Cause we all know what happened to Hotmail after MS bought it a few years back.
 
I wouldn't suggest Google pairing with .Mac, but I can think of some nice enhancements *I* would make...

More webspace, cheaper price, standard Apple reliability.

I think that sums it up for most of us.

-Clive

I think they should make .Mac free.


Now... re: MS buying Yahoo.... I think that's hillarious for New Zealand as up until recently Telecom used to use MSN and now have changed to Yahoo.
 
Oh I don't really know, the Google products list is huge. .Mac is basically Google's game and Apple could let Google do what they do best and stick to the ever-expanding Apple catalog.

So basically what you are saying is: Tack googles name up there, even though we don't really know what they would bring to the table, just to get more sales and a higher potential audience?

Thank you, no.
 
If you are an MSFT hater, you should be rooting for this deal. They will be buying at the top of the market, and the integration between the two companies will be horrible. It would be a 60 billion dollar mistep.
 
I can see it now: MSN Search and HotMail on iPhones instead of Yahoo and Yahoo Mail :eek:

Heh, maybe you are right - this might be MS trying to get a piece of the iPhone action! (Ballmer was just putting us off the scent)

P.S. Has anyone used Live Search? It seems to throw up a tiny amount of results and be next to useless when compared to Google.
 
Not a toy

I wonder if the users of yahoo mail are frequent email users though. I'd rather have the computer savy gmailers than the grandmas on yahoo mail. They aren't your market.

First, Apple isn't limiting the iPhone to "computer savy" people. Certainly, tech savy folks will be early adopters, but the iPhone will not be a sucess if it is relegated to only geeks with money. Apple's appeal is they can make something that is technical and powerful and make it easy for non-tech people to use. The iPod started off as a geek toy and is now in the mainstream with mom and dad and even grandma and grandpa using them. There are all kinds of new an interesting uses of the iPod beyond just listening to music. How do you think Apple can sell 10 million a quarter and keep those numbers going? Because the same non-computer savy people using Yahoo! Mail are buying them too.

Secondly, the iPhone, like other Apple products, is intended to create a market where there wasn't one before. No one knew they needed an iPod until they bought one, and then they discovered how useful it was and bought another. Apple has a history of disrupting markets because they change the rules and people's perceptions of said market. The iPhone will be no different. Any feature that has the potential to appeal to the masses is an important part of Apple's strategy.

And along with that dynamic, Apple has the ability to create secondary markets for other companies that align with them. Perhaps internet mail is not used that often by some, but a device like the iPhone has the potential to change that. It holds the potential to reinvigorate existing technologies by taking advantage of them and changing how they are used. Yahoo! Mail stands a good chance of becoming a more important technology for Yahoo! by virtue of millions of iPhone users wanting to use it with their phone.

We shouldn't underestimate the potential this device has to completely change the way we use and think of a phone. The iPhone is not just a geek toy.
 
So basically what you are saying is: Tack googles name up there, even though we don't really know what they would bring to the table, just to get more sales and a higher potential audience?

Thank you, no.

No, that's not what I meant at all. I am saying .Mac is not worth what I pay for it and it needs to be reworked. Who better to do that then Google. Web services is Googles game and based on .Mac its not a game Apple is so great at. They could also, obviously, be the answer to this perceived e-mail problem that could arise from the MS Yahoo purchase.
 
If MS were to shut down Y! messenger and incorporate its userbase into MSN then it would truly dominate the IM market. And that is not a good thing. At least not if you're a Mac user.
 
i don't see how this should be allowed. not because i just plain don't like microsoft, but because it's swallowing up more competition.
 
I'd be happy too!

Good, I'm glad. I don't like the way yahoo sets its stuff up, so if MS buys it they'll either totally remake it so it's a better service, or they'll totally remake it so yahoo uses only MS tech like they did with hotmail and make it worse so people will stop using yahoo as much and give other companies services a chance to compete.
 
I love how Microsoft complained about DoubleClick, a much smaller entity than Yahoo, and yet they want to add a huge chunk to the conglomerate.

Total desperation move.
 
No, that's not what I meant at all. I am saying .Mac is not worth what I pay for it and it needs to be reworked. Who better to do that then Google. Web services is Googles game and based on .Mac its not a game Apple is so great at. They could also, obviously, be the answer to this perceived e-mail problem that could arise from the MS Yahoo purchase.

I'll agree .mac isn't worth the money (hence why I don't purchase it), but I don't think google is the solution to .mac's problems. I think APPLE needs to work on it themselves, there's a thread that I was in a while ago where one user stated that apple could greatly improve .mac with not a lot of effort. I agree with that user, and I'd love to see apple actually make a move to fix .mac.
 
I realize that Yahoo E-mail can push an e-mail, but is that really necessary. If RIM can push any email to their Blackberry's why can't Cingular/AT&T, or Google, or Apple provide the server technology to make it happen?
 
I'll agree .mac isn't worth the money (hence why I don't purchase it), but I don't think google is the solution to .mac's problems. I think APPLE needs to work on it themselves, there's a thread that I was in a while ago where one user stated that apple could greatly improve .mac with not a lot of effort. I agree with that user, and I'd love to see apple actually make a move to fix .mac.

Yep, I made some of these comments. It would not cost Apple very much to enhance .mac especially at the enhanced cost/benefit ratio it would give Apple as more prople would sign up.
Examples are plenty, like an integrated web editable calendar, notes, easier calendar sharing, server side spam filter, push email, integration of .mac services into OS X like iCards in mail, more sync options, etc. or even a VOIP service with iChat.
It's really not hard to improve upon .mac and it is definitely not all about the iDisk space.
 
I don't understand...Why is it so bad that Microsoft is talking about buying Yahoo? Are all these people voting negative simply because they don't like Microsoft?:confused: :confused: :confused:

That's my take. For years, my primary email's a Yahoo! address (I reluctantly pay the stupid POP annual fee because I don't want to go through the hassle of switching email addresses). Meanwhile, I found the Hotmail of years ago to be horrible, and that's before I switched to Macs.

If Microsoft swallows Yahoo!, it might be time for me to get a Gmail address...
 
this is probably an attempt from M$ to stymie the iphone. they see it as a threat despite their denial.

you know they'll dick with yahoo till it sucks. they did the same thing with sympatico email. AND they'll make it ugly...
 
Google Flickr

Hmmm... my Flickr Pro account in coming up for renewal and I was already annoyed about being forced to drop my Flickr username in favor of a crappy, far longer Yahoo username.

I guess this development makes the decision for me.

Can anyone recommend a good Flickr alternative?

I'd go Picassa if Google got their finger out and released a Mac version.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.