Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually, the point is quite clear. People will eat s**t willingly,
well, its very hard for apple defenders to take double standard like this. at one hand, they kept saying 95% of ppl using windows because they are stupid. On the other hand, they claim 70% of people using iPod or (safari on OSX) because iPod/safari(for OSX) is better than anything else out there.

There always are, clearly, two factors, products, and ppl who are using it. Its easy to exaggerate one for your own advantaged in debate.

But at least one thing is clear, Windows isn't THAT difficult to use. isn't it? In this case, you really think 95% of people using windows despite the humongous difficulties of windows compare to OSX?
If anything is inaccurate and ludicrous, it is the claim:

Vast majority? You are clearly hallucinating.
how do you know? You saw some data somehwere?
Great point, how many updates does Vista (still badly) need, and how few updates are necessary with a solid OS like Leopard?

solid OS like leopard.....?? still patching basic functions after 8 months of release, planning a 10.6 for stability and performance enhancement. How solid is it? You tell me.
 
LOL!

Vista has had one SP. Leopard has had four.

Fanboys! :rolleyes:

Actually you are both wrong.

Vista has had 1 major service pack, along with lots of smaller updates. I have a copy of Vista on my MacBook and have noticed some of these being installed at shutdown. I haven't kept an exact record, but the ITs Vista website has and they list 83 updates alongside 704 hot fixes issued for Vista to date.

Leopard has had 4 smaller than service pack updates and a couple of security updates on top of that.

Apple and Microsoft are two different companies with two different strategies for updates.

Trying to judge software value/quality solely on the basis of size and frequency of updates is a little naïve.
 
No they wont.
A vast number of Windows users most certainly have been for the past 22 years.

Sorry, this is Leopard were talking about? You know, the OS with a higher SLOC than Vista and a similar installation size?
The bloat I refer to is a mess of patched sloppy and error ridden code, which has been Windows demise for the past 22 years. The SLOC in Leopard are not hacked in this fashion, resulting in a much more stable and more responsive platform.

Really. Ok, go and look at the number of PCs sold last year then go and see how many had Vista installed and still do.

LOL, look at the exorbitant number of businesses, consumers, and pros who have downgraded back to XP, and who will likely wait for Windows 7 before considering the risk of another monumental disappointment.

Vista has had one SP. Leopard has had four.

Vista SP1 = One hell of an extreme makeover.
Leopard updates = minor refinements and patches.
Nice comparison, Windows Fanchild.
 
Vista SP1 = one hell of an extreme makeover?

To be honest, I don't know if I have SP1. If it downloads automatically, I do. If it doesn't, I don't. Either way, I've never had any trouble with Vista.

If you have an older computer and upgrade to Vista you might have trouble, especially finding drivers. But it's really not a bad OS at all. It works great on new computers.
 
Vista SP1 = one hell of an extreme makeover?

To be honest, I don't know if I have SP1. If it downloads automatically, I do. If it doesn't, I don't. Either way, I've never had any trouble with Vista.

If you have an older computer and upgrade to Vista you might have trouble, especially finding drivers. But it's really not a bad OS at all. It works great on new computers.
It should be pushed via Automatic updates now.

Vista only lacked drivers for my video card and TV tuner. I've had flawless operation from it otherwise.
 
well, its very hard for apple defenders to take double standard like this. at one hand, they kept saying 95% of ppl using windows because they are stupid. On the other hand, they claim 70% of people using iPod or (safari on OSX) because iPod/safari(for OSX) is better than anything else out there.

No one claimed that Windows users are stupid. You seem to be assuming that the majority of Windows users actually chose to use the Windows platform. This simply is not true. It is the default OS pre-installed on PCs, as it is the platform licensed by most businesses worldwide. Thousands of hours of downtime and productivity have been lost due to system crashes,
and issues which have given IT techs a boon of business. On the other hand, of the 70% of iPod users, 70% actually chose the iPod over competitors.

But at least one thing is clear, Windows isn't THAT difficult to use. isn't it?
True, it isn't difficult to use. Vista has made improvements to stability, and nagging improvements to security, but a majority of users would prefer not to invest in a computer upgrade with RAM sufficient enough to run Vista.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/t...15316800&en=3ee2a82dbd97932d&ei=5070&emc=eta1

solid OS like leopard.....?? still patching basic functions after 8 months of release, planning a 10.6 for stability and performance enhancement. How solid is it? You tell me.
You are finding fault with ongoing refinement of an already solid OS, plus the effort to improve performance even more by implementing multi-core technologies and reducing the SLOC? I'll remember that the next time BMW introduces a newer, innovative, and higher end performance model.
 
No one claimed that Windows users are stupid. You seem to be assuming that the majority of Windows users actually chose to use the Windows platform. This simply is not true. It is the default OS pre-installed on PCs, as it is the platform licensed by most businesses worldwide.
What is the default OS on Apple computers? Do they get to choose? So I can say, apple computer users are forced to use osx?
 
What is the default OS on Apple computers? Do they get to choose? So I can say, apple computer users are forced to use osx?
Quite the contrary. Mac can run Windows, Linux and OS X. Mac offers an integrated hardware and OS solution for those who wish to avoid compatibility issues amongst the OS, hardware, and apps. A bit more reliable in terms of stability, and in turn, productivity, most would say.
 
Do you mean Mac users are forced to use Mac OS X? :rolleyes:
If you put it that way, then why you iFans are crying because Windows users are in fact using Windows?

Someone said PC (non apple computers, regarldess of the operating system) users are using Windows because they have no choice. and I'm saying same applies to apple PCs (apple computers). you have no choice either but to use osx when you buy apple computer. so you should stop complaining. irrespective of what you use, the same logic applies to both.
 
Quite the contrary. Mac can run Windows, Linux and OS X. Mac offers an integrated hardware and OS solution for those who wish to avoid compatibility issues amongst the OS, hardware, and apps. A bit more reliable in terms of stability, and in turn, productivity, most would say.

you mean to say OSX is crippled so that it won't run on non-apple hardware. Windows and linux run on mac hardware, kudos to Windows and Linux for not crippling the software, NOT apple. PCs run everything as well except paralyzed osx, written exclusively for a specific hardware.

credit goes to win/lin.
 
If you put it that way, then why you iFans are crying because Windows users are in fact using Windows?

Someone said PC (non apple computers, regarldess of the operating system) users are using Windows because they have no choice. and I'm saying same applies to apple PCs (apple computers). you have no choice either but to use osx when you buy apple computer. so you should stop complaining. irrespective of what you use, the same logic applies to both.

But you choose whether or not you buy a mac, and thus become a mac user. In the work place it is often that a Windows PC is placed in front of you and you're forced to use that.

Mac is a cult, Windows is a religion. You choose to join the cult, often you're born into a religion. (Really, really really bad analogy.)
 
Vista SP1 = One hell of an extreme makeover.
Leopard updates = minor refinements and patches.
Nice comparison, Windows Fanchild.

Actually Vista has been stable way before SP1. SP1 is just a bunch of old updates and then some pack into one. SP1 just makes it easier to install and also to satisfy people who thinks stability only comes when SP1 is released.

As far as Window compatibility issue is concern, I'm actually surprise how well its been working. I just don't think you can get 100 percent stability because of the thousand and thousands configuration, then your got to add legacy on top of that. Even Apple which makes their own OS on system they build still manage to get bugs.

Once Apple builds an OS that can run on thousands and thousands configuration and run it stable, then Apple users have every right to bash Vista compatibly issue.
 
But you choose whether or not you buy a mac, and thus become a mac user. In the work place it is often that a Windows PC is placed in front of you and you're forced to use that.
You can buy a PC and choose whether to run Windows (default) or Linux (self install), thus become either win/lin user.

In the work place, you just use whatever you are given. I have to use a mac at work, I'm fine with it, but I prefer my win/lin machines at home. one just has to adapt to work place whether with a mac or with a pc.
 
You can buy a PC and choose whether to run Windows (default) or Linux (self install), thus become either win/lin user.

In the work place, you just use whatever you are given. I have to use a mac at work, I'm fine with it, but I prefer my win/lin machines at home. one just has to adapt to work place whether with a mac or with a pc.

One can also choose what OS to run on a Mac too! In fact on a Mac you have even more choices (OSX) of what OS to run.
 
Actually Vista has been stable way before SP1. SP1 is just a bunch of old updates and then some pack into one. SP1 just makes it easier to install and also to satisfy people who thinks stability only comes when SP1 is released.

As far as Window compatibility issue is concern, I'm actually surprise how well its been working. I just don't think you can get 100 percent stability because of the thousand and thousands configuration, then your got to add legacy on top of that. Even Apple which makes their own OS on system they build still manage to get bugs.

Once Apple builds an OS that can run on thousands and thousands configuration and run it stable, then Apple users have every right to bash Vista compatibly issue.

i don't mean to seem like another macalyte chiming in here...

but when you release a product and expect your 90% marketshare to adopt it, you better be able to make it stable on its thousands of configurations. I don't think just because apple's os is only stable on 20 iterations of its 2-3 computers, those apple users can't be critical of vista.

microsoft delayed and delayed and cut some of the most important promises of their OS... and still delivered a sub-par product. I don't accept that of microsoft.

I, as an apple user, reserve the right to bash the hell out of vista. I wanted it to be a smashing success. I beta tested it and i built a vista box for when it was finally released. I am furious with MS. Apple needs real competition so they don't get lazy like they are kinda getting with the iphone (gasp! ;) )
 
Actually, the point is quite clear. People will eat s**t willingly, up until they are led to discover something better, without the rancid flavor, and higher in nutrition content. One of the reasons that the Mac retail stores have been, and continue to be, so successful is that people are able to actually compare their rather dismal experiences to something far more refined in terms of quality, elegance, productivity, and lack of bloat. For those who have experienced drinking fine wine out of fine crystal, cardboard cups tend to be quite a let down.

What I am confused about is why a Windows user such as BongoBanger is in a Mac forum? insecure about his 'platform choice' he feels the need to troll Mac forums bashing people who run Macs simply to boost his own fragile self esteem?

Getting back to your reply. You are right. In New Zealand we don't have stores owned by Apple, but what I can say is that they've really tightened up on their sales. The big names like Noel Leemings and Harvey Norman have a beautiful Mac display with trained Mac sales people who actually own Mac's themselves.

Apple stores in New Zealand would never work due to the small size, but they have worked to make sure that the buying experience in these stores is equal or better than a dedicated Mac store. Heck, I bought myself an iMac (which I am using now), standing at a bus stop. A lady waiting started up a conversation (she owns a local business) about how she moved from PC to a Mac. Its amazing how she explained her experience, how just using a Mac in a shop with some assistance from a knowledgeable staff member convinced her that a Mac was a better option.
 
i don't mean to seem like another macalyte chiming in here...

but when you release a product and expect your 90% marketshare to adopt it, you better be able to make it stable on its thousands of configurations. I don't think just because apple's os is only stable on 20 iterations of its 2-3 computers, those apple users can't be critical of vista.

microsoft delayed and delayed and cut some of the most important promises of their OS... and still delivered a sub-par product. I don't accept that of microsoft.

I, as an apple user, reserve the right to bash the hell out of vista. I wanted it to be a smashing success. I beta tested it and i built a vista box for when it was finally released. I am furious with MS. Apple needs real competition so they don't get lazy like they are kinda getting with the iphone (gasp! ;) )

Well if MS is responsible for whatever people hardware and whatever drivers they stick in their system and expect them to run smoothly, then Apple is responsible for battery issue, bad HD, bad lcd, buggy OS they themselve put together.

Tell you what...bashing the other guys, only creates enemies. I have seen people who don't give a **** about this Window Vs PC thing, but when push comes to shove, they pick a side...and most of the people I know goes against Apple.

Sorry dude, but you are sounding like another macalyte chiming in here...
 
I hate to be one of those people, but have you even used Vista recently? it's a pretty solid OS. I like to play around with it (I don't have any serious use for it), but I find it very pretty, but at the same time very stable.

I would agree that for the VAST majority of computer users Vista is a great OS.

How can you say that when you have "just played around with it"

Try running a couple of dozen of system intensive applications from Adobe suite to music production and so on at the same time, for days at a time, with a dozen hard drives, 16 Gigs of RAM, and let me know how it goes for you. I can do that on my mac and a lot more and it almost never misses a beat.

Edit: Sorry I better clarify or else other members here will just poo their pants in outrage: yes most users won't do as much as some with the machine, what I'm saying is, that it's not a stable OS until it's tested to certain decent limits and nothing tests an OS more than a whole lot of apps made from different unrelated parties, days of sleeping / waking and all those apps interfacing with various bits of third party hard ware such as digital audio, video cameras etc etc. all working together seamlessly. I haven't tried Vista for this kind of use, because all my software is for the mac (hooray) but I know for a fact that just using vista for a few basic apps and trying to push it around a bit, it's basically useless, so I stick to XP for my legacy apps at work (of which there are now only TWO left that I can't get made for mac).
 
Yes there are a lot of trolls on this forum which is why I posted such a response.

In the end I think a lot of the heat of this long running debate is not as much technical as it is political and actually the social realities behind the technical and engineering decisions that lead to the reality of the systems we have today.

That is what the fight is about. it's about principles of engineering, design, aesthetics, and ethics.

On the one side, there is Microsoft. See Ballmer.

On the other side you have Steve.

Neither company is perfect, so this argument can go on forever until one takes it to the next level where the passion about this is really coming from. Either you think that Microsoft is the standard for aesthetics, design, or you think Apple is closer to the mark.

Then again you hit points of discrepancy, The argument is never solved. Some will always side on one side and some on the other.

What can't be argued (in my opinion) is that Apple is a) a superior company, providing superior products, not without it's faults but that is years ahead of Microsoft in almost every department. b) that Microsoft stole and leap frogged Apple in the technology department and peddled to the masses a VASTLY inferior rip off, locked them onto it's platform and then created partly on purpose, and partly as an accident of their original poor ethics in engineering and design - IT based reality we live in where we need teams to keep the system running. When you stand back and examine it, it is poor. Vista is more of the same, only on a newly more complex level.

OS X is designed to decent engineering standards and principles, therefore, those principled choices early on have translated to positive effects later. Microsoft is just trying to fill the holes with vista, you know you can build a water proof roof with straw, **** and silicone gel, but it's not a great design, even if it might be ok for a lot of people when you have to choose no roof or roof made of straw and ****.

Apple users who know the story of the companies reasonably well like Steve because he IS the proverbial pirate who could no matter how rich he is or how corporate his peers are, he still lets us know that he hates that ****, and doesn't give a damn about it except for making great stuff for us to enjoy. How much would it cost to build an iphone from scratch - hundreds of millions in R&D presuming you started with nothing. It's science fiction, i'ts fantasy. Left to Microsoft?? Forget it - Left to Nasa even! ?? forget it. Steve says, screw this, we can do it, we can make this thing, and everyone rallies behind him and in the end it's not him who's the champ, it's everyone at Apple AND Steve. Cool environment. He's a bit of a Gordon Ramsay - cool I like that, why would you let noodles and nerds dictate to you how to get things done say it like it is, you'll be dead one day and will you look back and say damn I was such a ***** or I made an iphone and look how much everyone enjoyed not using their crap old phones. I can tell you right now that Apple has made a REAL difference in my life through making everything so much easier to user. I used to suffer with windows for years until in 98 when I started using macs, and that was with the old OS, it was terrible but still better than windows, then came mac osx and I was like yeah this is what it's mean to be. It has just made everything so much better, and without windows pooping on my life every day, I'm a happy camper. Apple has done things wrong, I'm not a fanboy (really), but when I get upset I just remind myself of what it was like with MS..... and I realise as somebody funnily quoted here earlier, that I was complaining with a belly full of lobster while others had to eat slop.

Things like iphone, the mac, mac osx, make you think, yeah, you can acheive cool things in your life with the right amount of focus determination and energy, microsoft is just a depressing hunk of junk fat on the blood of the apple, but it's tummy is running dry and soon it will need to feed again or die. You can say I'm going to make something quality with my energy (aka steve at apple) or you can just succumb to desperation and fear and create windows and flog it to the masses like a **** burger with lettuce plus snail. Buy Buy Buy ....

Die Die Die you nasty beastly thing windows, die and die and transmute into fresh soil so that new life can come where your beastly form once occupied space and resources. ha ha ha :D I wait the day when microsoft closes it's doors forever. you shall be the poop beneath my rose garden, and apple orchard.
 
Well if MS is responsible for whatever people hardware and whatever drivers they stick in their system and expect them to run smoothly, then Apple is responsible for battery issue, bad HD, bad lcd, buggy OS they themselve put together.

Tell you what...bashing the other guys, only creates enemies. I have seen people who don't give a **** about this Window Vs PC thing, but when push comes to shove, they pick a side...and most of the people I know goes against Apple.

Sorry dude, but you are sounding like another macalyte chiming in here...

Apple's battery life, HDs, lcds, do not suck, and the OS is far from buggy. If the OS does a few bugs, that's not bad considering the swarm found in others. Most people I know in IT, major corporations, and professional media production who have recently switched are amazed at their increased productivity due to not having to restart and reformat their systems, monitor viruses, spyware, malware, etc. Those who went with Vista originally, first switched back to XP before switching to a Mac. Vista was alright for many of them, but XP overall, was still faster, more responsive, and less convoluted by comparison. Those who prefer to get their work done, using a state of the art system on well written apps, consider Macs over the so called standard environment they were originally immersed in.
 
i don't mean to seem like another macalyte chiming in here...

but when you release a product and expect your 90% marketshare to adopt it, you better be able to make it stable on its thousands of configurations. I don't think just because apple's os is only stable on 20 iterations of its 2-3 computers, those apple users can't be critical of vista.

microsoft delayed and delayed and cut some of the most important promises of their OS... and still delivered a sub-par product. I don't accept that of microsoft.

I, as an apple user, reserve the right to bash the hell out of vista. I wanted it to be a smashing success. I beta tested it and i built a vista box for when it was finally released. I am furious with MS. Apple needs real competition so they don't get lazy like they are kinda getting with the iphone (gasp! ;) )

If Microsoft really give a toss about the stability of their operating system - they would have raised the bar over who gets the Windows Vista sticker - use the Windows Vista as a sticker of 'quality' which customers should look for. Those companies who don't measure up, don't get the sticker.

Couple that with an advertisement campaign by Microsoft along the lines of 'Windows Vista Inside' and you'll find customers will refuse to do business with companies whose hardware doesn't measure up to the specifications and quality set down by Microsoft.

Standardised platform for example, EFI firmware for example, ACPI conforming to the specifications - and NO work arounds provided by Microsoft for buggy implementations of ACPI (which cause a great deal of problems). SATA that conforms to the SATA standards and not require 'special drivers' to get things done. Same goes for sound cards (Intel HDA compatible) etc. etc.
 
Boo microsoft needs to just die...:)

apple doesn't need competition, it needs revenue and customers to drive it so it can make more and better products. It's apples time to shine :) :apple:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.