Maybe, but these are super-duper ugly“AirPods are so ugly”
There is one, 10s of millions more, and they will have a hitI actually like the look of the surface pods. I like the unique look of it.
I wouldn't pay the asking price for Beats/Apple headphones either because I despise their sound profile which is highly "designed". Again, it's all down to what the user likes and how educated they are in sound. A lot of people won't be fussed how they sound.Those things are ugly imo, but whoever likes them should buy them.
But who would want to pay $199 for tinny sound? Even if they were “beautiful” I wouldn’t pay $49 let alone $199 for tinny sound.
There's no Active Noise Cancellation, so the only sound isolating comes from the fit of the Surface Earbuds in the ear.
The case charges over USB-C, and there's no wireless charging included.
What exactly is iconic about them? Let alone courageous (other than the ridiculous shape)?And once again, even in the absence of Steve Jobs, Apple has an unique, courageous product that it’s iconic, cool, and defines its own category, while producing metric tons of cash.
This comparison feels like Zune vs. iPod all over again.
Nobody is copying AirPods (except for cheap knock-offs). AirPods look like sticks. All other earbuds use more compact in-ear design.I’m not entirely sure what they were thinking when designing that thing to be fair.... one thing is certain, they are one of the few that aren’t carbon copying the AirPods...