MLB should change to 16 Game Season like NFL?

Discussion in 'Community Discussion' started by Frisco, Jul 14, 2014.

  1. Frisco macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2002
    Location:
    Utopia
    #1
    I think this would be a good idea:

    1) It will create more urgency. Now it like: win, lose, win, lose, who cares, etc.

    2) Make the games 6 innings like it is in Little League. By time the 5th inning comes around I am half a sleep anyway.

    3) Less injuries. And pitchers won't wear out their shoulders as much.

    4) Sometimes less is more and I think this would do MLB a great service.

    Opinions/Thoughts?
     
  2. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6

    ucfgrad93

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado
    #2
    Ok, I can see cutting the season back some, but cutting it to 16 games is just absurd. I say cut it back to 140 games, shorten the season by a month.
     
  3. MacDawg macrumors Core

    MacDawg

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Location:
    "Between the Hedges"
    #3
    Totally disagree

    If you don't like the game, fine
    But others of us enjoy it the way it is
     
  4. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #4
    A few things, no

    The players union would never allow any cut in games.
    The owners would never allow it. 81 home games means ticket sales.

    If they want to cut 10 games fine, but baseball is a summer sport.
     
  5. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #5
    My opinion (since you asked for it) is that you sound less like someone who wants to improve baseball and more like someone who dislikes it altogether.
     
  6. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #6
    Plus I would like to see more NFL games. 16 is too few. It should be an 18 game season.
     
  7. SandPebble macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2012
    #7
    I don't think it will happen.

    As has been stated, the players union and owners would not agree and the fans would go nuts.
     
  8. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #8
    It will never happen.
     
  9. AustinIllini macrumors demi-god

    AustinIllini

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #9
    100 baseball games. That's the MOST extreme I would go. 162 is way too many
     
  10. carjakester macrumors 68020

    carjakester

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Location:
    Midwest
    #10
    Reminds me of george carlin,

    "You know how you speed up baseball? Everybody gets one swing. That's it one swing ******* you, you're out sit down!"
     
  11. Frisco thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2002
    Location:
    Utopia
    #11
    Okay maybe 16 games is too short, but 162 is way too many. I don't know how the players do it.

    18 Games in the NFL is too many. It would only create more injuries and even more lawsuits from head injuries. It's just too physically demanding of a sport.

    The NFL should cut the preseason schedule. No one really watches those--or do they?
     
  12. Koodauw macrumors 68040

    Koodauw

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Location:
    Madison
    #12
    The best thing baseball could do is make it so that the average fan can afford to attend several games a season and have decent seats.
     
  13. Ray Brady macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    #13
    16 games is way too many. It should be one game. Not one game per team, mind you. One game in which all teams play all other teams simultaneously. I don't have all the logistics down yet, but I'm pretty sure it won't be boring.
     
  14. Don't panic macrumors 603

    Don't panic

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Location:
    having a drink at Milliways
    #14
    i personally agree that there are too many games, and the games are too long and often boring, but any radical change would also nullify all the historical statistical part of the game, which is a core part of its appeal to the fans, so i don't see it happens and it would alienate the most the core fans (although it might bring in new ones).

    if they were to cut it, the reasonable way would be to go to 82 (plus playoffs) like for basketball, the structure of the leagues is similar and it accounts for a logical subdivision of the games.

    same things with the number of innings.
    the 'show' would probably benefit, but it is too much of a change for what is usually a very conservative (not in the political sense) crowd.
    if they were open to really radical changes (which again it is not a realistic option) i would favor a 6-innings game, with 4 outs (instead of 3). you'd get roughly the same number of minimum at-bats (24 vs 27), but a shorter, more dynamic and higher-scoring game

    for football, the opposite is true, they should increase the number of games, possibly to a point where every team plays everyone else. no massive differences in schedules, which i always found very weird.
     
  15. Frisco thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2002
    Location:
    Utopia
    #15
    What? :rolleyes:
     
  16. Plutonius macrumors 604

    Plutonius

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    #16
    An average nine inning pro baseball game is shorter then an average pro football game. One exception is when the Red Sox plays the Yankees. Those are almost always long games.
     
  17. Frisco thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2002
    Location:
    Utopia
    #17
    Maybe baseball just seems longer because no one is moving 99% of the time.
     
  18. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #18
    There is probably more game action in a 5 minute span of a baseball game then there is in an NFL game. No stoping to move the chains, or check a replay, or a commercial.

    Don't forget that a NFL game is 1 hour, yet it takes 3 to play.
     
  19. Mousse, Jul 14, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2014

    Mousse macrumors 68000

    Mousse

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Location:
    Flea Bottom, King's Landing
    #19
    No way. Preseason is when they evaluate borderline talent in a game environment. It should be cut back to 3 games, since the final preseason game is basically a warm up game for the starters.

    As for baseball, I wouldn't mind if they cut the season down to zero games. Baseball is one of the games--like golf and soccer--that's fun to play, but boring to watch. At least with soccer we have Oscar worthy actors doing their own stunts.:D

    Sounds like a Vince McMahon plan.:eek: A battle royal. Teams that gets scored on, leaves the field until there are only 2 teams left. Then it's playoff overtime rules football.:cool: It would be interesting to see a team field both their offense and defensive unit at the same time.:D
     
  20. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6

    ucfgrad93

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado
    #20
    Alot of that time difference is because of commercial breaks.
     
  21. Carlanga macrumors 604

    Carlanga

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    #21
    umm IDK… THere is more downtime in between plays for the NFL than MLB, but at the end of a game, there is more running, moving etc in an NFL game than a baseball game.

    ----------------------

    If we are just trowing crazy ideas, then how about baseball moves to a time frame game instead of an innings only game to make it more interesting.

    Lets say, keep the 9 innings, but limit the game up to a proper time limit for the game to be officially completed or just 9 innings whoever it finishes first (this way old stats would prob still work). Basically add an end clock to the game, but if tied and the game has to be decided then one small overtime or ONE extra inning and if nothing then we go to home run derby for decision lol :D
     
  22. carjakester macrumors 68020

    carjakester

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Location:
    Midwest
    #22
    baseball has a bit more but not by much..

    I prefer hockey which always has at least 60 minutes of action. :D
     
  23. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #23
    There are also more players on the field for a NFL game. How many minutes does each player see on the field? All 9 fielders are on the field in a baseball game for the whole game. Ok 8 if a pitcher doesn't go a full 9.

    The great thing about baseball is that there is no clock. A game could go 2 hours or 4.
     
  24. Carlanga macrumors 604

    Carlanga

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    #24
    You think is great? For me that is one of the reasons I don't watch too much baseball, you never really know when its gonna end and I have things to do, so unless is the finals of the season I don't watch too much baseball. :cool:

    I'm a soccer fan first> american football = basketball> baseball> tennis.

    How about timed innings?
     
  25. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #25
    I don't always watch a full game, when I am in the car I have it on the radio. My phone updates me with scores. Who says you have to sit in front of a TV for 4 hours to enjoy baseball? The pace is casual, and that is what I like about it.
     

Share This Page