Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
SOmething I just noticed in beta 3: California has way more color options and “off white” is now “cream”. These are “canary yellow”. I kind of wish the colors filled full screen rather then being accents but i suppose this is fine

1513EBBA-2DC9-4B83-8AF2-F6841EF8FB84.png A87EA07E-0255-4BEF-A238-B9A4A0E2BEB4.png
 
Also, a new feature for Infograph in OS 6 is this new mono color look. I’m not really a fan, but maybe it will look better if developers build their apps against watchOS 6. It’s a bit too spartan for my tastes—devoid of joy

View attachment 843779
It’s actually way less distracting and easier to discerne information. I’m sure Apple got a lot of criticism for the info-graph face being WAY too busy and hard to read or else they would have kept it as is.
[doublepost=1562454668][/doublepost]
Infograph definitely does have kind of a chintzy quality to it with full color complications but i personally prefer that more toyish look over what is essentially greyscale. The Solar Dial face proper themes the complications, so I dont understand why Infograph has to look so drab.
View attachment 843829
I have an S3 and I honestly don’t like the look of all the curved complications on S4 mixed with standard ones. Seems like Apple couldn’t figure it all out and it’s now a mishmash. Pre S4 watch faces look much more coherent.
 
I’m sure Apple got a lot of criticism for the info-graph face being WAY too busy and hard to read or else they would have kept it as is.

Well, they have kept the face as-is. they just added options. in my opinion these options havent been executed properly. The curved ones do have legibility problems, but I welcome them since they really do have a lot of viability in terms of information density at a glance, however strained and prolonged that glance may be
 
It’s actually way less distracting and easier to discerne information.
I thought that too, but meanwhile I returned to the colors.
My battery complication is on bottom left for the last two years and with monochrome setting my eyes are for bit of a millisecond missing and searching the green color. Everytime I look at my watchface. Although I KNOW that battery is bottom left.
My brain is connecting the colors to specific complications very hard:
Waterminder is the blue one
Battery is the green one
and so on.

With monochrome all looks the same. Harder to discerne.

Just my 2 cents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jonnyb098
Apple just doesn't care about the legacy faces anymore. The biggest update you'll get to them is maybe a new colour. :(
Which is why they need to either drop the legacy faces or update them for the larger watch screen. SO many of them still have the single large complication at the bottom that just makes no sense anymore. Perfect example are the fire, water, vapor faces that still use these old style complications and should be updated to the newer curved style. Makes no sense as those arent even that old either. Barely 2 years ago.
 
I like the faces but I wish there were more options to customize the colors. I’m not crazy about the white/color combo. I really like the rainbow faces because they have different colors in them.
 
Which is why they need to either drop the legacy faces or update them for the larger watch screen. SO many of them still have the single large complication at the bottom that just makes no sense anymore. Perfect example are the fire, water, vapor faces that still use these old style complications and should be updated to the newer curved style. Makes no sense as those arent even that old either. Barely 2 years ago.

I have no clue what they have been doing with watchOS over the years.

Seems like they move at a languid, incremental, conservative pace, and yet even so it doesn't feel like a mature platform. There's so much in need of updating: almost all of the system apps are in need of a refresh—Activity (now Fitness), Photos, Calendar, among others—third-party faces still aren't an option, according to devs its still a nascent SDK that's a pain to develop on, and they have all these legacy faces full of crufty old-style complications.

Apple have done some nice stuff this year like the ability for apps to have multiple complications, the redesigned watchface customization screen, sleep tracking, and the surfacing of once hidden force touch items, but I'm pretty sure that iOS 7 was a far more mature OS than watchOS 7 is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xDKP
I have no clue what they have been doing with watchOS over the years.

Seems like they move at a languid, incremental, conservative pace, and yet even so it doesn't feel like a mature platform. There's so much in need of updating: almost all of the system apps are in need of a refresh—Activity (now Fitness), Photos, Calendar, among others—third-party faces still aren't an option, according to devs its still a nascent SDK that's a pain to develop on, and they have all these legacy faces full of crufty old-style complications.

Apple have done some nice stuff this year like the ability for apps to have multiple complications, the redesigned watchface customization screen, sleep tracking, and the surfacing of once hidden force touch items, but I'm pretty sure that iOS 7 was a far more mature OS than watchOS 7 is.

Agreed but in all fairness Watch OS is barely 5 years old. If you think back to iOS 6/7 of 2012 (when it was 5 years old), there were plenty of issues as well.

From a development standpoint they still support the series 3 on Watch OS 7 which means those old style complications are here to stay for at least 1-2 years. At the time they stop supporting the series 3 they will be HOPEFULLY forced to update a lot of the watch faces to look much better since ALL watches sold by that time will have the larger screen of series 4/5/6
 
So I was curious what the Watch Face UI might look like with neumorphism from macOS Big Sur. Just added more depth to the face and perhaps even dynamic edge shadows based on wrist angle (battery consumption is an issue). So I mocked up a few ideas quick while trying not to move too far from Apple's existing design language.

Neumorpic Watch UI 2.png
Neumorpic Watch UI.png
 
So I was curious what the Watch Face UI might look like with neumorphism from macOS Big Sur. Just added more depth to the face and perhaps even dynamic edge shadows based on wrist angle (battery consumption is an issue). So I mocked up a few ideas quick while trying not to move too far from Apple's existing design language.

View attachment 933021View attachment 933022

i like them; I see some German Bauhaus aesthetic in them, whether that was intentional or not. Looks sorta like something from Nomos or Junghans:

1594579594947.jpeg

1594579645057.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: zaneliu
  • Like
Reactions: RedGT
They look very elegant.....why can’t Apple do classic looking watch faces, the analog ones we get always seem a bit too cartoon for my liking.
Thank you! I suspect they may prefer the simpler look for clarity and battery conservation. Shadows also likely take more to display cleanly and may look bad if it’s low res. But I would definitely love to see more neumorphism and depth introduced to the watch! Feels like a natural place for it
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedGT
I think Infograph is cool. The corner complications can be nifty but they are a bit special-cased and bespoke—they dont apply to any other face, its a bit weird. Infograph is one of my most used ones, it has a neat design. I do wish that you could get rid of the gradients for the sliders and select your own solid colors.
[doublepost=1558411403][/doublepost]

Thats something I wonder—some people prefer analog and say its quicker to read since its symbolic or something. yet most people cannot read an analog face without the ticks. isnt digital like objectively quicker and easier to read? the aesthetics of the hands are cool but there are cool design opportunites for digital as well
Digital for me is definitely faster, even if just a fraction faster than analog with markings or numbers. No markings would definitely be noticiably slower to translate than with markings.
 
They look very elegant.....why can’t Apple do classic looking watch faces, the analog ones we get always seem a bit too cartoon for my liking.
This is exactly why I love that you can swipe to multiples. Sometimes I like Mickey telling me the time; sometimes I want a lot of info right there, and other times I want to exercise.
 
Im terrible at reading analog—digital is instant, analog is a process. The only regret that this brings me is how I cant use some of the cooler Apple Watch faces
Exactly. You have to translate analog in your brain. May be in the hundredths of seconds, but it's still slower to translate analog than to see digital and instantly know the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fayette3001
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.