But I thought the Swiss watch industry wasn't concerned about Watch (or any other smart watch for that matter)?
To me this is the best of both worlds. I have several watches and the idea that I could add smart capability by simply changing the band... well, I'll buy that for a dollar. Or, as in this case, several hundred.![]()
I think Montblanc is on to something novel. The only smartwatch that appealed to me was the LG Watch R because it looked like a traditional watch. 5 day battery life means not charging nightly. Even sweeter.
Also, like MR member spencers mentioned, the bands are 22 mm not 42 mm; that would be as wide as the watch face.![]()
This is a great way to repurpose and extend the functionality of a jewelry timepiece.
If I still had my (stolen) Omega Speedmaster Apollo Moon Watch, I'd consider this. But since I don't, I'm very much looking forward to buying an Watch. (Main reason I didn't buy a replacement.)
But kudos to mount blanc for showing more vision for dealing with the coming attack from smart watches than the rest of the "leaders" in its industry (this is based on what has been said and not whatight be soon revealed.)
I still don't see a need for a watch and I have Apple Pay already in something I already carry with me, my phone.
It's not the only smartwatch that looks like a traditional watch: http://recode.net/2014/12/22/finally-a-smart-watch-that-doesnt-look-like-a-geek-watch/
This one also doesn't require recharging AT ALL.
But I thought the Swiss watch industry wasn't concerned about Watch (or any other smart watch for that matter)?
But I thought the Swiss watch industry wasn't concerned about Watch (or any other smart watch for that matter)?
So, I can pay $300 and just get this strap OR spend ~$350 for an entirewatch?
Considering the strap itself is better than the entire AppleWatch. I'd take the strap.
heck, call it anything you want, it's already more practical with much better compatibility and battery life
unless sending your heartbeats to others is a "Must have".. then I agree with you
You may be right for version 1. That said, Apple are good at thinning things down. So maybe by version 2 or 3?I'd think theWatch is bit too chunky to wear like that.
Right... "better", better get some new dictionary because yours is broken.
That was the quote from Nick Hayek CEO of Swatch Group. (Widely considered to be either misdirection, or just whistling past the graveyard.)
Seems like a very weak, token gesture.
"Apparently people want screens now, so lets bolt one on in a disconnected fashion that's the equivalent of wearing a pager. People still use pagers, right?"
Apple Watch is a game changer. This seems like a New Hat.