I wonder if the new nano will do blu-ray...
![]()
Waiting for Apple to add it to the Shuffle....
No...
(sarcastic, sarcasm....)
I wonder if the new nano will do blu-ray...
![]()
Yes. I am also familiar with the term sarcasm...
yeah and cut our selves up. no thanksI really hope the new touch will slice bread and even butter it too...
Waiting for Apple to add it to the Shuffle....
No...
(sarcastic, sarcasm....)
Does anyone think that the new Nano is a little big? I think it's too big to be a Nano....maybe it's a redesigned Classic?
I'm telling you guys,
Top right opening on the Touch case= Speaker, baby.
All I keep thinking is that this new Nano is ugly and awkward. IF the two different cases (and the mock-up photo) are real, it'll take a bit for me to understand Apple's thinking on this.
I would accept a small multi-touch based iPod.. that's moving forward. But this possible wide-screen, click-wheel Nano just doesn't sit right with me yet.
No! Its definitely not for a speaker. The iPod Touch is ULTIMATELY AN iPod and seeing that no iPod till date features a speaker.... neither will the touch! Besides... it'll just go on to add more size to the iPod and the 'impossibly thin' logo will be lost!
No! Its definitely not for a speaker. The iPod Touch is ULTIMATELY AN iPod and seeing that no iPod till date features a speaker.... neither will the touch! Besides... it'll just go on to add more size to the iPod and the 'impossibly thin' logo will be lost!
No! Its definitely not for a speaker. The iPod Touch is ULTIMATELY AN iPod and seeing that no iPod till date features a speaker.... neither will the touch! Besides... it'll just go on to add more size to the iPod and the 'impossibly thin' logo will be lost!
There obviously is a reason apple went back to the old form-factor. The 'fatty' nano was a nice design but there's got to be some underlying technology to this new design; then again, the nano always gets radically re-designed with each generation. I'm still not sold on the curved front, but I'm sure in person it will look great - hopefully they don't drop the dock connector, though.
I saw a couple walking down an aisle in a store the other day doing just this on a cheap cell phone. Actually blaring the damn thing as loud as it could go with the woman holding it on her shoulder like a 1982 Boombox. I walked right past them within two feet and still could not make out the song, just tinny, shrilly garbage. The saddest thing is that they looked like they were enjoying it. The whole situation bothered me.I don't want speakers. iPods are personal listening devices, they fill up your world with music, leaving others unannoyed.
Imagine all of the kids blaring music in the park, on the train or on the street like they already do with they're cell phones.
...The iPod Touch is ULTIMATELY AN iPod ...
All you people who cry "fake" or "fugly" or "ugly fake" are probably going to love the thing as it is when it comes out.![]()
Definitely the ugliest thing ever. Uglier than the Zune in fact. I'd rather have a brown $h!t smelling Zune.
Not me. I am still looking for a working not too bad looking 1st gen Nano. The best looking of the bunch.
I think that this nano and the Zune both look fine. Definitely nicer than the hideous square nano. (also less usable, because of the awkwardly placed hold switch). It does, however, seem strange that Apple would go to a design that many other PMP makers have already done. Not to mention the fact that they are returning to the stick-styled nano.
In my opinion, the second gen nano was the best looking of the nanos. It was a sexy, silm version of the Mini.
Nothing really new or surprising then. I have never really understood some things the mini/nano crew at Apple came up with:Things look to be heading in the right direction for this uber fugly Nano to be real and on Apple shelves soon after to the back to school promo.
Clearly shows that Apple engineers are either on vacation, or are smoking crack and shooting up.
Obviously the touch is like that for the sensors, the big one on the right top corner is the other side for the wi-fi signal and the small is an ambient light sensor
Andrew