Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple would do the same thing for the iMac they did with the MacBook Pro's - saving the Retina display for the high end iMacs. I don't want a retina display. Too few companies are supporting it and it's going to take a long time for web site developers to create graphics with such high resolution.
 
I don't claim to understand Apple's strategy and know that desktops are well below iPhones, iPads and MacBooks in the grand priority scheme.

But waiting 500+ days to update a computer seems like they're leaving revenue on the table. Most of those in the know are waiting, waiting waiting. Seems to me they could do a simple refresh with USB 3 and a few other pieces and satisfy the eager masses. I know for my part I've waited already since January and given that I've waited this long, I'll keep waiting. Really annoyed about it, but those are first world problems.

yeah, couldn't have agreed more on this!
 
If Apple waits until October, they're doing themselves and their customers a disservice.

There are plenty potential iMac customers right now that just want marginal updates to the hardware (Ivy Bridge, USB 3, Kepler, etc) and are not going to pay the money for the 2011 models.

To maintain optimal momentum of the product line and sales, release the 2012 version now with the marginal hardware updates, and then in mid-to-late 2013 you can wow the world with a re-design, Retina, whatever.
 
I don't claim to understand Apple's strategy and know that desktops are well below iPhones, iPads and MacBooks in the grand priority scheme.

But waiting 500+ days to update a computer seems like they're leaving revenue on the table. Most of those in the know are waiting, waiting waiting. Seems to me they could do a simple refresh with USB 3 and a few other pieces and satisfy the eager masses. I know for my part I've waited already since January and given that I've waited this long, I'll keep waiting. Really annoyed about it, but those are first world problems.

Is 500 days really too much? Who buys a new desktop computer every year?

I still work on a 2007 mac pro and (2) 2008 iMac's every day. I have no issues running any software and I am a software developer. I am getting close to needing a hardware refresh, but the casual user can probably go even longer.
 
With how badly the NVidia GT 650M drives the Retina display I hope the iMac would pack any Kepler-based GTX GPU.

Any how I wish they released Ivy Bridge iMac a few months back and then release the Retina display iMac by October.
 
Apple would do the same thing for the iMac they did with the MacBook Pro's - saving the Retina display for the high end iMacs. I don't want a retina display. Too few companies are supporting it and it's going to take a long time for web site developers to create graphics with such high resolution.

exactly, IMO the retina display at current seems like a showcase technology that apple is offering at a high premium price that most people cannot afford. this retina thing is not needed, they dumbed down the entire macbook pro u cant upgrade hdd, ram or anything else, well i wont call that a macbook "pro" bec in near future base 256 gigs ssd will soon run out of space.
 
No retina display please.. No graphic card out there can drive that amount of pixels sub-30fps, yet..

Practically every card can drive that amount of pixels at sub 30 fps. Surely you meant over and not sub?

----------

exactly, IMO the retina display at current seems like a showcase technology that apple is offering at a high premium price that most people cannot afford. this retina thing is not needed, they dumbed down the entire macbook pro u cant upgrade hdd, ram or anything else, well i wont call that a macbook "pro" bec in near future base 256 gigs ssd will soon run out of space.
I don't understand why a non-upgradeable notebook computer is dumbed down. I would love to hear your logical reasoning.
 
Is 500 days really too much? Who buys a new desktop computer every year?

From Apple's point of view, for one of their core product lines, I think it really might be. As he stated, they're leaving money on the table. That's never a good thing.
 
Is 500 days really too much? Who buys a new desktop computer every year?

I still work on a 2007 mac pro and (2) 2008 iMac's every day. I have no issues running any software and I am a software developer. I am getting close to needing a hardware refresh, but the casual user can probably go even longer.
If you really loved Apple, then you would upgrade every year.

:p *joking
 
If the new iMacs won't have the Retina Display, why Apple should release them in October?
 
Amen, A small spec bump should have been already updated

Glad I don't really follow the rumors (for the most part) and buy based on my need, or else I'd be waiting forever!


Same, I got an open box iMac in Feb because I didn't want to wait based on rumors. Glad I did, or else I'd still be waiting.
 
retina display
solid state storage
no optical drive
soldered ram
thunderbolt, usb 3, hdmi,
very, very thin.

Why in the name of Woz does it have to be very, very thin?
It will compromise it's performance even more.
Soldered ram? Please, just stop it. :mad:
What is wrong with people?
 
Perhaps the form factor should be made thinner on any new iMac, but I'm not convinced screen improvement to a retina display is required. If Apple could just address reflectivity/glare with the current screens, it would be a significant improvement.

Then they just need to upgrade to new processors, USB 3, ditch the HDD for all SSD, ditch the ODD, make some further improvements in the speakers and iSight camera and I'd be all over getting one for the home office use. The current BTO with SSD already is one of, if not THE, fastest Macs out there (not sure about comparing to the new MBP's). With their volume purchases on SSD's, they should be able to lower prices on a base 21" iMac with 128gb SSD down to below $1000 and offer the 256gb SSD version for $1199 and a 512gb version for $1499.
 
I don't understand why a non-upgradeable notebook computer is dumbed down. I would love to hear your logical reasoning.

256 gb ssd space[base model] is not enuf for pro people, 8 gb ram is OK for now.

option to upgrade a macbook pro is always better as the software handles specs way better than windows, i would always buy the regular mb pro models, the newer ones are just showcase products just like the 1st gen mb air's. useless for me atleast
 
I am waiting for the Mac Mini. I think they should create a MOUNT on the back of a Cinema Display where you mount a Mac Mini like you do an iPhone to a Doc and call it the iMac. The new Mac Mini could be smaller as well.
 
With how badly the NVidia GT 650M drives the Retina display I hope the iMac would pack any Kepler-based GTX GPU.

Any how I wish they released Ivy Bridge iMac a few months back and then release the Retina display iMac by October.

Badly? 1 GB of GDDR5 RAM on new, energy-efficient graphics drives a 2880 x 1800 display badly? It drives it perfectly fine.
 
Perhaps the form factor should be made thinner on any new iMac, but I'm not convinced screen improvement to a retina display is required. If Apple could just address reflectivity/glare with the current screens, it would be a significant improvement.

Then they just need to upgrade to new processors, USB 3, ditch the HDD for all SSD, ditch the ODD, make some further improvements in the speakers and iSight camera and I'd be all over getting one for the home office use. The current BTO with SSD already is one of, if not THE, fastest Macs out there (not sure about comparing to the new MBP's). With their volume purchases on SSD's, they should be able to lower prices on a base 21" iMac with 128gb SSD down to below $1000 and offer the 256gb SSD version for $1199 and a 512gb version for $1499.

apart from great design, it shud always manage heat well, and better upgrades in mouse and keyboard(backlit), the magic mouse is useless for pro grade software
 
If Apple waits until October, they're doing themselves and their customers a disservice.

There are plenty potential iMac customers right now that just want marginal updates to the hardware (Ivy Bridge, USB 3, Kepler, etc) and are not going to pay the money for the 2011 models.

To maintain optimal momentum of the product line and sales, release the 2012 version now with the marginal hardware updates, and then in mid-to-late 2013 you can wow the world with a re-design, Retina, whatever.

Totally agree, in fact I'm still really confident that the new iMac will be released with Mountain Lion.
 
I'd prefer a smaller version of the Pro and be able to choose my own monitor. While the 'retina' screens are nice I don't like glossy screens. I also want something more expandable than the mini, or at least let me easily change the storage in my mini.
 
Please no retina display on these; I'ld much rather have better GPU performance.

Don't worry. If Apple does release a Retina iMac, I'm sure they will continue with non-Retina models, just as they have with the MBP.

If they do, it will make those happy that want Retina (me included), while still catering for those that don't.
 
I'd prefer a smaller version of the Pro and be able to choose my own monitor. While the 'retina' screens are nice I don't like glossy screens. I also want something more expandable than the mini, or at least let me easily change the storage in my mini.

Preach! Many have been wanting this for a loooong time.
 
looks like the new "folks" at apple are just "playing safe", nothing really bold and exiting came out since the 4s and i honestly dont care about apple events anymore, they ought to go after market share as windows is in trouble thanks to windows 8 and crap windows eco-system, people really appreciating mac platform, instead they seem like resting on their laurels and clearly not updating stuff with time.

look at iphone today it badly needs an upgrade, and same with imac and mac mini and mac pro models..this part of business is really healthy for apple. but god knows what their strategy is.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.