You take off your glove, and use the fingerprint reader. Simple.
Ever notice how the touchscreen on the iPhone doesn't work when you wear gloves? It was designed for use by the skin of your fingers...
Mine always worked with gloves.
You take off your glove, and use the fingerprint reader. Simple.
Ever notice how the touchscreen on the iPhone doesn't work when you wear gloves? It was designed for use by the skin of your fingers...
I'm also interested in this quote from the video about the sapphire "..acting as a lens to precisely focus it on your finger..". The RF is applied to the finger via the steel ring and then the variation in capacitance of the finger features are picked up by the sensor, if I understand correctly. I'm not sure where any lens/focusing is happening. It does appear to be a totally flat sapphire crystal "window", also.
Either way, no matter how tricky the sensor is, people can be trickier. Biometrics are not suitable for primary authentication.
How so, and what do you propose as a better alternative? To me it seems every bit as secure as a pass word but more convenient, which probably will make more people use it.
Anything secret; biometrics are not.
How is it not secure?
I beg to differ. Why wouldn't a thief take your finger along with your iPhone? If you think otherwise, you haven't done much traveling.
So you have nothing specific in mind, well it's better than nothing I think we can agree on.![]()
Oh Apple, why would you blunder so? Fingerprints are not passwords, let alone the perfect password. Touch ID -- identification -- yes, fantastic. Authentication? No. Everything you touch now has your "secret" password on it, and it bears mentioning that changing such a password is... difficult.
There are innumerable kinds of secrets. To name a few: a secret series of letters, numbers, and symbols, or perhaps a secret way of touching your phone, or a secret noise, etc. It doesn't really matter what it is (given that the device can sense it), so long as it requires knowledge only the user has.
They didn't show it, but does anyone know if you'll be able to authenticate your iCloud Keychain with your fingerprint? I had assumed this was a given when they introduced the feature, but nobody has mentioned it that I've seen.
The fact that they aren't opening access to the scanning for 3rd party developers is stupid. How nice it would have been to be able to have this feature replace passwords for a multitude of apps at launch.
Can't see the logic in that decision.
Jealousy is a byproduct of fear and insecurity. You can have lust and desire without jealousy, provided you are confident and secure.
No, they didn't as far as I know. I don't think this type of sensor can detect either pulse or temperature. An optical, infrared type could possibly do both. Could it be tuned/focused differently to pickup slight variations in position due to a person's pulse?
I'm dubious of the sensor being 3D, as stated previously in this thread. Taking a gander at patents and reading press articles, it seems the sensor is 500 pixels per sq inch-- going by the size of my IPhone 5's button, that'd be something like 16x16 pixles.
The ring doesn't apply anything to the finger, it is just used as a "switch" to enable the sensor. The sensor then reads the fingerprint at that point.
Complicated procedures leads to simple pass words like 1234 or no pass word at all which we were told represented about half of the iPhones. A security measure needs to be adapted to what is protected, for example it makes no sense to spend $100 to protect $10.
The ring doesn't apply anything to the finger, it is just used as a "switch" to enable the sensor. The sensor then reads the fingerprint at that point.
But since the whole thing is capacitive, there's nothing really to focus. The frequencies for any RF being emitted by the capacitive grid are too low. Optical lenses can't focus them.
In nearly all RF field sensors, a ring disposed around the sensor array acts as the electrode that drives the low frequency RF signal into the finger, which is attenuated by ridges and valleys in the print and finally captured by AC sensors as a high quality image.
The potential problem is that for a thief to access - and sell - the phone, they require your finger. So now they'll need more than just your phone!
If somebody chops off your finger, can they use it to unlock your iPhone?![]()
So what happens if you need to wear gloves? (skiing, hospital or factory/fab clean room, etc.)
The fact that they aren't opening access to the scanning for 3rd party developers is stupid.
Right now criminals can simply threaten you to give up your typed password and there you go. What they can't do with the detector is use your phone if they simply steal it or you lose it somehow. iPhone thefts may go way down.