Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,731
39,673


Yesterday, we uncovered evidence that Apple has been pursuing trademarks for the name "iPad", with some filings occurring as recently as late last week. The move has obviously led to speculation that Apple may be planning to use that name for its tablet device rumored for introduction next week.

At the time, we noted that Apple had not pursued an "iPad" trademark in the United States, ostensibly due to existing claims on the name by Fujitsu for an electronic retail inventory device. While Fujitsu initially filed its trademark application for "iPad" in March 2003, the trademark has yet to be officially accepted, and was in fact classified by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as "abandoned" in April 2009 after Fujitsu failed to respond to a request for additional information. In June 2009, Fujitsu applied to have the application revived and, after amendment, was published for public comment and opposition on September 1, 2009.

Gawker reports today on documents dug up by a new tablet-focused blog that show that Apple's lawyers have filed three requests with the USPTO over the past few months asking for extensions to the allowed time for parties to oppose the trademark application filed by Fujitsu. In their most recent request, which has been granted, Apple's lawyers requested an extension of the opposition period to February 28, 2010.


153247-apple_ipad_opposition.jpg


The reason for Apple's potential opposition is unknown, with speculation of course centering on its desire to publicly introduce its tablet device as the "iPad" before filing documents stating its case to the USPTO. While it is possible that Apple may simply object to Fujitsu's "iPad" trademark on the grounds of possible confusion with its similarity to Apple's "iPod" trademark, those circumstances do not necessarily offer an explanation as to why Apple has requested so many extensions to the opposition period rather than simply filing its opposition.

Article Link: More Hints at Apple's Desire to Hold 'iPad' Trademark for Tablet Device
 
Its a smooth name but it would certainly be made fun of. Imagine seeing a commercial for an iPad. Lets call it the Macsipad! :)
 
Why do people think it's going to be either iPad or iSlate.

Can't it be both? I'm thinking that the device will be called the iSlate, but perhaps some software or app inside the device's OS will be called the iPad.
 
if ituoch wasnt tooken i think that would be good. ipad doesnt seem. bad. now just bring on the att subsidized pricing :rolleyes:
 
Interesting developments tracked here by both MacRumors and Gawker. Clearly a misstep by Fujitsu that Apple seems to want to pounce on.

I'm no legal expert and don't understand the basis/legal foundation of the opposition extension request but pushing it out to Feb 28, 2010 gets me thinking that Apple may have bought themselves a window to introduce a product under the iPad name.

Any lawyers here that can chime in from a trademark and legal perspective?

This is getting very interesting :apple:
 
Explanation?

I have filed for trademarks myself and based on the posted article I think I can offer an explanation:

When you file for a TM, but have not yet "used it in commerce" the TM is classified as "intention of use". Until the status of the TM becomes "used in commerce", meaning it is being sold, the TM cannot actually be granted. So, it appears Apple's desire to extend the time to oppose Fujitsu's move to revive the TM (which in itself would indicate it has not actual produced a product for sale) is due to the fact that, if Apple does produce an "iPad" device "used in commerce", its claim for the TM would supersede Fujitsu's attempt to revive its expired "intention to use" (my assumption) TM status. Sorry for the *very* long sentence.
 
No. It should not be called iPad. It sounds like it's going to be covered in period blood.
 
I'm beginning to believe that there's actually two different devices here.....

Maybe iSlate is the tablet and iPad is for some sort of multi-touch pad keyboard thing for their desktop line.

Maybe a little far-fetched, but you never know!
 
The reason for not filing an opposition instead of an extension is simple: They want to see if they can just get Fujitsu to agree to release it first. If they don't, then hardball.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.