iPad... iPod...
We need iPud, iPed and iPid next![]()
and sometimes iPyd.
iPad... iPod...
We need iPud, iPed and iPid next![]()
I have filed for trademarks myself and based on the posted article I think I can offer an explanation:
When you file for a TM, but have not yet "used it in commerce" the TM is classified as "intention of use". Until the status of the TM becomes "used in commerce", meaning it is being sold, the TM cannot actually be granted. So, it appears Apple's desire to extend the time to oppose Fujitsu's move to revive the TM (which in itself would indicate it has not actual produced a product for sale) is due to the fact that, if Apple does produce an "iPad" device "used in commerce", its claim for the TM would supersede Fujitsu's attempt to revive its expired "intention to use" (my assumption) TM status. Sorry for the *very* long sentence.
Its a smooth name but it would certainly be made fun of. Imagine seeing a commercial for an iPad. Lets call it the Macsipad!![]()
I thought MadTV started that...
I thought MadTV started that...
Why do people think it's going to be either iPad or iSlate.
Can't it be both? I'm thinking that the device will be called the iSlate, but perhaps some software or app inside the device's OS will be called the iPad.
I don't even want to know what an "iPed" would be...
God, we still have a week of this crap to endure.
PLEASE LET IT BE OVER.