Sayer said:
The build number in Safari's about box is the one I saw one my webserver last week surfing in via an Apple IP (I believe).
So there is some credibility there at least as far as Safari goes in my mind.
I usually see newer Safari builds as we get closer to a new release of either Safari itself or Mac OS X updates/releases all on Apple IPs.
So unless someone went to an obscure website with a spoofed Apple IP and this exact Safari build number, this aspect of the 10.4 rumor is accurate.
I'm not commenting whether I think these are fake or not, but you've ignored a few much more plausible possibilities.
First, someone who wanted to plant fake Safari version numbers might naturally start by going to the websites of Macrumors members. Your public link doesn't go to your obscure website, but the pictures of your daughters posted on your blog
do. Anybody looking at your blog is producing entries in the access log of your site.
Second, it isn't necessary to
spoof an Apple address. Apple's a big company. They look at the rumor sites just like we do. Apparently they get a kick out of it, or at least they did back in the day of the
really wacky rumors. I wouldn't be surprised to find fake rumors started by Apple employees just to tweak forumgoers.
Third, if the entry you saw in your logs
was a legitimate entry from an actual Apple employee using an unreleased version of Safari, then that surfer doubtless surfs other web sites as well. If you saw this version number in your access log, then someone else (someone interested in scamming) might have seen it in
their access logs.
Fourth, hey, it could be real. Who knows? I'm just saying it's not quite the either/or situation you stated. I don't think it matters so much now. We'll all know tomorrow.