Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm starting to lose faith in the Mac community. Everyone except for ArmyKnight12.


U2 PWNS ALL!
Nah.

Their first album was original and interesting but that was twenty-eight years ago :eek: it's been downhill ever since.

Kenny G is overrated
I nominate ..

- Barbara Streisand
- Celine Dion
- Whitney Houston

Another vote for Kiss...a few good songs, but definitely overrated.

I'd also say that Metallica is overrated. They were good up until (and including) the 'Black' album. They haven't put out any good music since; they're kind of just a joke now.
Speaking as someone who remembers those days ... :)

I find it amusing that almost every "metal-head" on the planet hated both of these groups when they first appeared.

Kiss especially was considered a joke of a band to anyone who was "serious" about metal. People used to throw things at them in some of their first shows. Metallica was considered a poor copy of "real" metal and completely unoriginal. Go to the local library and check the reviews and you will find this is true.

Today they are both fondly remembered in the metal halls of fame as "giants" of the genre, and defended as geniuses.

Marketing anyone? ;)
 
I don't know if you can say a conductor is overrated, unless they write scores most of them just conduct what is written.

Yes but conducting is all about interpretation, the same as any other mode of performance. Score markings only go so far, even the obsessive ones. Were that not the case, we'd only need a discreet upbeat and nod from the first desk and away we'd go, soldiers loyal to the metronome.

Wanda Landowska once said, while trying to end a dispute with someone else (somebody help me out here!) regarding her ornamentation of J.S.Bach, "Well you play Bach your way and I'll play him his way." The conductors of well known symphonic works all seem to have equally self-confident reckonings, from what one hears in recordings of their varied results.

And how not, really. You must have strong belief in yourself picking up the baton to lead a symphony orchestra. I figure the ego strength is about the same as that of a surgeon, or a four star general. Right or wrong, it's a big deal goin' down when they suit up!
 
Their first album was original and interesting but that was twenty-eight years ago :eek: it's been downhill ever since.

Boy - 10 out of 10
October - 9/10
War - 5/10
The Unforgettable Fire - 8/10
The Joshua Tree - 7/10
Rattle and Hum - 7/10
Achtung Baby - 8/10
Zooropa - 2/10
Pop - 0/10 (ABYSMAL!)
All That You Can't Leave Behind - 6/10
How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb - 9/10
 
I won't concede that Joy Division is overrated, but I'll second the the MBV nomination. For early 90's shoegazer, they can't hold a candle to Ride.

A man after my own heart - Ride were one of my most loved bands, Nowhere and Going Blank Again two of the finest albums ever.

Blankagainridecover.jpg
 
I apologise if someone has already posted this, I'm not going to read this entire thread. I nominate Guns and Roses.

Only Axel Rose would consider iiiieeeeiii a acceptable lyric. And saying "November Rain" would be the next "Stairway to Heaven"! Puh-leease! Pretentious much?
 
Boy - 10 out of 10
October - 9/10
War - 5/10
The Unforgettable Fire - 8/10
The Joshua Tree - 7/10
Rattle and Hum - 7/10
Achtung Baby - 8/10
Zooropa - 2/10
Pop - 0/10 (ABYSMAL!)
All That You Can't Leave Behind - 6/10
How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb - 9/10

Although Pop wasn't their best work, it's NOT a Zero. People underappreciate (if that's even a word, I forget...) that album and powerful songs like 'Last Night on Earth" "Mofo" " Wake Up Dead Man" " Do You Feel Loved" among others. Clearly, the Joshua Tree gets more than a 70 and War shouldn't get a 50... and Zoopra would never get a 20 and All that You Can't Leave Behind at least gets an 88. I hope your not a teacher because you'd be a hard grader, as these albums are artistic genius IMO.
 
I figure the ego strength is about the same as that of a surgeon, or a four star general. Right or wrong, it's a big deal goin' down when they suit up!


I gotta agree with that. I've had four different conducting teachers, and all of them have had HUGE personalities. Their job is to convince 100 musicians that their artistic vision for a piece is the one the orchestra should be following. In other words, to impose their will on 100 people, all of whom have egos of their own.
 
Theres loads of bands that are overrated or overhyped (both different in my mind)
However the one that sticks out over the last couple of years is the Artic Monkeys
Oh ! and usually anything Jo Whiley on BBC Radio 1 raves about
 
There are a lot of overrated musicians listed in this thread (The Beatles and Radiohead not being among them). However, none of them, especially the recent ones, come anywhere near to ERIC CLAPTON. Sure, Coldplay is way overhyped, and Dave Mathews just sucks, but nobody ever called them "GOD" or the "Greatest Guitar Player Who Ever Lived"!

The best thing Clapton ever did was his solo on "While My Guitar Gently Weeps." His best officially credited work was with Creme, but that was decades ago, and he's renounced it as being commercial. Since then, he's put out record after record of milquetoast crap. He is not a good songwriter, and he is not an interesting singer, and while he may have good technique as a guitarist, he is rarely inspired, and never brilliant. He's certainly nowhere near as good as hugely underrated guitarists like Richard Thompson or Kristin Hersh. Hell, I'd rather see Elvis Costello play a guitar solo any day of the week than listen to Clapton wank.
 
There are a lot of overrated musicians listed in this thread (The Beatles and Radiohead not being among them). However, none of them, especially the recent ones, come anywhere near to ERIC CLAPTON. Sure, Coldplay is way overhyped, and Dave Mathews just sucks, but nobody ever called them "GOD" or the "Greatest Guitar Player Who Ever Lived"!

The best thing Clapton ever did was his solo on "While My Guitar Gently Weeps." His best officially credited work was with Creme, but that was decades ago, and he's renounced it as being commercial. However, since then, he's put out record after record of milquetoast crap. He is not a good songwriter, and he is not an interesting singer, and while he may have good technique as a guitarist, he is rarely inspired, and never brilliant. He's certainly nowhere near as good as hugely underrated guitarists like Richard Thompson or Kristin Hersh. Hell, I'd rather see Elvis Costello play a guitar solo any day of the week than listen to Clapton wank.

I agree with you completely. Creme stuff was rockin, guest guitar part on the Beatles' "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" is beautiful. Everything else he's done since then is very boring.
 
Dave Matthews Band is a close second. It seems like they only know one song, and it's not even that great a song to begin with.

I second DMB, but the fact that they haven't been out really that long makes them less on the scale than, say, the Rolling Stones. The Stones were (are) just a bunch of drugged-up, twisted, self-centered guys who happened to become popular. A close second is the Beatles. The Beatles were original, granted, but had no song-writing talent whatsoever. George and Ringo could write some good stuff, while John and Paul could only write cheesy jingles that would be strung together to make a song.

I think a general rule is that any group, if they're reeaaall popular, is going to be over-rated to some degree.

I disagree about U2 - I think their lyrics and live concert energy make them quite remarkable - but again, with their high degree of popularity they have become over-rated to an extent - I say this acknowledging the fact they're one of my favourites..

m2c... now, Stones fans, beat me up! I'm ready...
 
ill put my vote in for soldier boy

well.. and most other rap artists.. really, if i wanted to put a few different beats on loop and talk fast about random pointless topics.. im sure i could do it

ill take you to the candy shop:confused:
ay bay bay:confused:
walk it out:confused:

-edit
just realized it was for bands.
whoooopppsssss
 
I second DMB, but the fact that they haven't been out really that long makes them less on the scale than, say, the Rolling Stones. The Stones were (are) just a bunch of drugged-up, twisted, self-centered guys who happened to become popular. A close second is the Beatles. The Beatles were original, granted, but had no song-writing talent whatsoever. George and Ringo could write some good stuff, while John and Paul could only write cheesy jingles that would be strung together to make a song.

I think a general rule is that any group, if they're reeaaall popular, is going to be over-rated to some degree.

I disagree about U2 - I think their lyrics and live concert energy make them quite remarkable - but again, with their high degree of popularity they have become over-rated to an extent - I say this acknowledging the fact they're one of my favourites..

m2c... now, Stones fans, beat me up! I'm ready...

Well you asked for it:)

If the Stones never did hard drugs we wouldn't have had Exile on Main, perhaps the greatest album ever. If it weren't for LSD we'd never have Their Satanic Majesties Request. All we'd be left with is the bombast and self-congratulatory pomposity of U2, that photo-op that poses as a band.
 
This might piss a few people off..... but I have to nominate Tom Petty. He is just the poor man's Bob Dylan.

As always, saying "_______ is a poor man's _______" is a little simplistic, but I think you're on the right track. Tom Petty doesn't bother me and he's not talentless. He just doesn't have much going on. (Did anyone else think his Super Bowl halftime set was dull? I would argue that "Running Down a Dream" is his only famous song that raises anyone's pulse for such an event.) He's one of those guys who made the RnR HOF simply by hanging around a long time and selling albums.

In the same spirit, I'll call John Mellencamp a poor man's Springsteen.
 
In the same spirit, I'll call John Mellencamp a poor man's Springsteen.

I'll go with that, but I do like Tom Petty for what he is. Think of him as a top-notch MOTR rocker. The radio would have been a poorer place without him for the past 25 years. Credit where credit is due.
 
Any "alternative grunge" band from the 90's...

They wanted to be "different" - they all ended up being "the same"...


You have to give it up for Alice in Chains though..... They rocked pretty hard. One of the best live bands I have ever seen, and I have seen a lot.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.