I'm really torn on this. Main problem is price for increased RAM and storage.
CPU
I'm 100% certain I'll be going for an 8-core i9 processor. Having 2 extra cores helps a lot with how many tracks you can have when producing music.
The consensus seem to be that the performance boost in 2.4 vs 2.3 GHz is so limited, thermals considered and all, that it simply isn't worth an entire $200 extra.
GPU
I love to chill out by gaming occasionally, so I'm 100% certain I'm going for the 5500M instead of the 5300M GPU.
Also, I'm 100% certain I'm going for the 8 GB VRAM version instead, as this increases rendering speed when editing video a lot and is only $100 extra. My main plan is to use this computer for music, but video seems to be a bigger and bigger part of a musician's life going forward, so I'm pretty sure I will get use out of that extra VRAM later.
RAM
I'd love to have 64 GB of RAM for a solid headroom for tons of sample-based tracks when making music, but that's $800 extra! I already feel a $2900 machine is an expensive thing to invest in, take care of, insure and carry around every day doing all sorts of stuff. Pushing the price up to $3700 immediately makes me feel almost scared of using it. I also feel the performance-per-dollar immediately drops a lot when doing that.
However, RAM matters a lot when making music, I'd love to not having to freeze a single track when producing and really have that freedom to just focus on the creative aspect of things.
My current thought is simply compromising and go with 32 GB. I'm so, so tempted by that headroom that I'm willing to bite the bullet to a certain degree. However, I think, even if I'd absolutely love 64 GB and just completely relax with that for the 5 years or so I'll be using this machine, it simply feels like I could have used those money just on a great monitor, half a fantastic audio interface, two great microphones or a lot of other things that are maybe even more important than that headroom.
Storage
I have similar feelings towards storage. I'd love to have it, but it's so, so expensive. Right now I'm torn between 1 and 2 TB.
Ideally, I'd love 8 TB. I mainly compose music, and when doing so, I use a lot of sample libraries. I do not do much orchestral things, but it happens that I'll put in something like that. However, I love the heavy stuff like Omnisphere, Keyscape and Superior Drummer all stacked together in the same session. A main point of buying a laptop is being able to take it with me and make music everywhere. I would love the freedom to not _always_ having to attach an external drive just to open up a normal session with some sample libraries because I don't have the space for it on my main drive.
But my wallet and sense of responsibility for machine and economical sense do not agree at all. 8 TB is just ridiculous economically, and I'd not feel comfortable having an expensive machine like that at all.
So what about 1 TB. That's a huge compromise. I'd be needing some space for a Windows partition and a game or two. Then my core sample libraries, hopefully all I'm currently using. 400 GBs of samples and libraries? Then there are all the latest music projects I'm working on, other applications and a sizeable document store. It seems I could get by, but I'd have to always make sure to store archived stuff on another drive. And if I were to get into video at the same time, I would start to struggle quite quickly. I would be needing to always bring that external drive.
1 TB would feel very good economically, but I really do not want to regret my purchase either.
Now, 2 TB immediately gives a lot more flexibility. That first TB will be occupied by both OS's, all the software and other core stuff. That second terabyte will basically be free to use for anything. The computer will however be suddenly quite expensive at this point at a total of $3700. Not as comfortable as $3300.
What do you guys think?
What is a reasonable choice here? Will I get by with that 1 TB and will I be happy dragging along an external drive from time to time? Maybe it won't become an issue, and maybe only when I use really exotic samples? Or will I be happy I had that extra TB, and after a while relax that the computer is $3700?
CPU
I'm 100% certain I'll be going for an 8-core i9 processor. Having 2 extra cores helps a lot with how many tracks you can have when producing music.
The consensus seem to be that the performance boost in 2.4 vs 2.3 GHz is so limited, thermals considered and all, that it simply isn't worth an entire $200 extra.
GPU
I love to chill out by gaming occasionally, so I'm 100% certain I'm going for the 5500M instead of the 5300M GPU.
Also, I'm 100% certain I'm going for the 8 GB VRAM version instead, as this increases rendering speed when editing video a lot and is only $100 extra. My main plan is to use this computer for music, but video seems to be a bigger and bigger part of a musician's life going forward, so I'm pretty sure I will get use out of that extra VRAM later.
RAM
I'd love to have 64 GB of RAM for a solid headroom for tons of sample-based tracks when making music, but that's $800 extra! I already feel a $2900 machine is an expensive thing to invest in, take care of, insure and carry around every day doing all sorts of stuff. Pushing the price up to $3700 immediately makes me feel almost scared of using it. I also feel the performance-per-dollar immediately drops a lot when doing that.
However, RAM matters a lot when making music, I'd love to not having to freeze a single track when producing and really have that freedom to just focus on the creative aspect of things.
My current thought is simply compromising and go with 32 GB. I'm so, so tempted by that headroom that I'm willing to bite the bullet to a certain degree. However, I think, even if I'd absolutely love 64 GB and just completely relax with that for the 5 years or so I'll be using this machine, it simply feels like I could have used those money just on a great monitor, half a fantastic audio interface, two great microphones or a lot of other things that are maybe even more important than that headroom.
Storage
I have similar feelings towards storage. I'd love to have it, but it's so, so expensive. Right now I'm torn between 1 and 2 TB.
Ideally, I'd love 8 TB. I mainly compose music, and when doing so, I use a lot of sample libraries. I do not do much orchestral things, but it happens that I'll put in something like that. However, I love the heavy stuff like Omnisphere, Keyscape and Superior Drummer all stacked together in the same session. A main point of buying a laptop is being able to take it with me and make music everywhere. I would love the freedom to not _always_ having to attach an external drive just to open up a normal session with some sample libraries because I don't have the space for it on my main drive.
But my wallet and sense of responsibility for machine and economical sense do not agree at all. 8 TB is just ridiculous economically, and I'd not feel comfortable having an expensive machine like that at all.
So what about 1 TB. That's a huge compromise. I'd be needing some space for a Windows partition and a game or two. Then my core sample libraries, hopefully all I'm currently using. 400 GBs of samples and libraries? Then there are all the latest music projects I'm working on, other applications and a sizeable document store. It seems I could get by, but I'd have to always make sure to store archived stuff on another drive. And if I were to get into video at the same time, I would start to struggle quite quickly. I would be needing to always bring that external drive.
1 TB would feel very good economically, but I really do not want to regret my purchase either.
Now, 2 TB immediately gives a lot more flexibility. That first TB will be occupied by both OS's, all the software and other core stuff. That second terabyte will basically be free to use for anything. The computer will however be suddenly quite expensive at this point at a total of $3700. Not as comfortable as $3300.
What do you guys think?
What is a reasonable choice here? Will I get by with that 1 TB and will I be happy dragging along an external drive from time to time? Maybe it won't become an issue, and maybe only when I use really exotic samples? Or will I be happy I had that extra TB, and after a while relax that the computer is $3700?