Just FYI to add here I stopped at a AT&T store today to get my wife a new case for her 5 and asked the manager about returns . 14 days and he added it would do no good since he won't see a silver/ white phone at the very earliest in October.
The fiasco on Friday was a result of poor business (no product) and corporate greed (Apple stores had them and secondary retailers didn't).
AT&T does returns
Well said. Thank You Guy. You got it from the start.
I don't think the Verizon store only wanted 20 Grey phones. I think it is a case of shut up and take what we give you and be happy. Those who think Verizon, AT&T or T-Mo had anything to do with what they got....keep drinking the cool-aid.
The fiasco on Friday was a result of poor business (no product) and corporate greed (Apple stores had them and secondary retailers didn't).
I think it is very poor business practice to release a highly anticipated product to the world and not actually have the product to sell. This all in the name of publicity so the media can report on the long lines waiting to get their hands on your latest, greatest thing. To report that the demand is SO crazy that you are selling out. Selling out of what? THERE WASN'T EVEN PRODUCT TO SELL!
you should read guy kawasaki's "the apple way"
he explains one of the shifts of apple's production cycle to a "pull" vs. "push."
I'd imagine it's tremendously complicated & challenging to figure out optimal distribution for a multi-country launch. They have to predict popularity of colors, capacities, carriers on a country-by-country basis and now account for a whole new line of less expensive iPhones, and predict how that will affect sales of the new flagship iPhone.
I know. I'm just saying that if Apple really wanted to, they could make it so that everyone who wants a phone on the release day could get one, without uncertainty, without camping, and without waking up early to place orders. But that wouldn't create the same buzz.
you should read guy kawasaki's "the apple way"
he explains one of the shifts of apple's production cycle to a "pull" vs. "push."
in push production a company, let's use sony, ms, or samsung (since they all use push) makes billions of units and then puts them out in front of the consumer at various price points and incentives, using billions of dollars of advertisement, and making sure that their retail partners are incentivized to push their product over the competitors through special pricing programs.
the company has to convince its target customer population that they want its products more than the competitions.
apple's pull tactic, however, uses strategic marketing to create demand among the user base. the user base shows up at the store already wanting the product. the demand is present before they walk in the door...before they even get in their car in the morning to drive to the store.
this tactic allows apple to stream line its production cycle and meet demand more closely as it dwindles down (versus at the outset when it's highest) and minimize stock space and discounted offerings for closeouts.
this was one of the revolutionary production tactics that Jobs is credited with when business majors credit him with having some level of genius. similar to how Henry Ford revolutionized automobile production. He didn't invent wheels or cars but he did change the landscape of how they were made and pioneered techniques that cut margins and raised profits.
this also enables apple to have all those flashy retail outlets without having to stock their shelves with product that no one will end up buying toward the end of a release cycle.
this isn't *just* some artificial method to manufacture demand. it's a legitimate and savvy way to manage retail stock in a fast paced consumer market where a smart and timely release like google's motoX can wipe out a less prepared competitor.
The fiasco on Friday was a result of poor business (no product) and corporate greed (Apple stores had them and secondary retailers didn't).
It always blows my mind when I see the number of people that think that purchasing a product from a company is their "right" before actually entering in to a transaction with the said company. If you wanted to buy a product from me, I can simply not sell it to you just because I don't like you. You don't have the "right" to do business with me. You seriously need to bring down your level of entitlement. A company doesn't owe you anything until you've actually entered a transaction and they are not holding up to their end of the bargain. In this case they were sold out. Too bad. You would think it's just common sense and someone doesn't have to spell it out for you?
Good thing he's not in your company and you're not trying to buy an iPhone from him.sorry to tell you but in my company you would be going home today
sorry to tell you but in my company you would be going home today
Not sure what the point of your post is. Clearly I said that from the perspective of someone in charge, not an employee. Who exactly is going to send me home? Also, if I refused to sell a product simply because I didn't like someone instead of a valid business reason, obviously I stand to only hurt myself. So thanks for pointing out the obvious and missing the point of my post completely?
It always blows my mind when I see the number of people that think that purchasing a product from a company is their "right" before actually entering in to a transaction with the said company.
While I agree that the OP could (should) have planned a little better, Apple decided that they would withhold information about availability which made it difficult for people to make good decisions.