Actually I think Apple's market share is somewhat stunted because so many consumers savvy. I talking about PC users who might be interested in a Mac, but...
1. Already have their own monitor, so the iMac is out.
2. Don't want to spend that much money on such a weak offering as the Mini.
3. Don't want to spent that much money on a Mac Pro.
The fact is, there's a $1500 difference in price between the most expensive Mini and the least expensive Mac Pro and that price gap reflects a wide gap in power too. Honestly, I believe that if there were a mid-ranged headless option, Apple's market share would jump a few points.
I think the mini is not going to be Just a box anymore, i think they are going to turn it into either a keyboard with just one wire monitor making less clutter and use the air parts to make it almost as small as current keyboards.
I think the mini is not going to be Just a box anymore, i think they are going to turn it into either a keyboard with just one wire monitor making less clutter and use the air parts to make it almost as small as current keyboards.
Sounds cool but I don't think a keyboard computer is going to end up working well. With the keys always going into the computer and/or someone accidently spilling their morning coffee on the keyboard, it doesn't seem like feasible product to me. If you were to spill something on the keyboard...it would ruin the whole computer instead of just the keyboard; sort of like a laptop? Ah ha...portable Mac Mini![]()
I don't think Apple is going to reinvent the Commodore 64.
Actually I think Apple's market share is somewhat stunted because so many consumers savvy. I talking about PC users who might be interested in a Mac, but...
1. Already have their own monitor, so the iMac is out.
2. Don't want to spend that much money on such a weak offering as the Mini.
3. Don't want to spent that much money on a Mac Pro.
The fact is, there's a $1500 difference in price between the most expensive Mini and the least expensive Mac Pro and that price gap reflects a wide gap in power too. Honestly, I believe that if there were a mid-ranged headless option, Apple's market share would jump a few points.
well, clearly the optimal situation here for users to do that you havent said is for them to
A: buy the imac/mac mini anyway regardless of 'monitorness'
B: buy the imac (if the mini does not have the power requirements), connect it to their new imac and use their screen to extend their desktop.
With all due respect, I don't think buying something you don't want is acceptable. It's not like the screen is free on the iMac - the price is built-in. You're paying for it. Certainly not an optimal solution.
Sorry, but an all-in-one does NOT fit all.
imowill wait till the internet 'chatter' on the new iMac's dies down a little before releasing the new mini .
That's what I keep telling myself and I am starting to believe it
One ,two , maybe three more Tuesdays at the most![]()
Just can't imagine what's taking them so long if the spec bumps are merely what many have assumed they will be (ie. X3100, etc).
for sure ....Just hope we're not waiting past May.
said before I know but a mini tower maybe ??
I'm tempted to say almost any changes would be welcome, but... just hope it's not a nano version minus optical drive.![]()
Actually I'd be quite happy to see that, if only because it would widen the gap that much more for the minitower so many of us are pining for.
Actually I'd be quite happy to see that, if only because it would widen the gap that much more for the minitower so many of us are pining for.
how do you see that the gap would be there for a mini tower?
I wouldn't have thought previously that Apple would be likely to add another desktop to its lineup, except that I thought the same thing about the laptops, and now we have three instead of two. Given the fact that the iMac, while an excellent option for many (I'm on mine at home right now) doesn't really fit into a progression of desktops, Apple really only offers the Mini and Pro, as many people have said.
Now that Apple market share has expanded notably, perhaps they've hit the threshold to offer a third desktop option. I'd personally love to see the Mini bumped down to an even cheaper entry-level option, and the introduction of a new consumer to prosumer (depending on configuration) range desktop with a decent video card option, upgradability to 4GB RAM, and two hard drive bays.
Price wise, maybe bump the Mini down to $399/$599 (low/high models), and the new tower at $799/$999? That'd give them a nice range like they've developed with iPods...$399 (low-end Mini), $599 (high-end mini), $799 (low-end tower), $999 (high-end tower), $1199 (low-end 20" iMac), $1499 (high-end 20" iMac), $1799 (low-end 24" iMac), $2199 (high-end 24" iMac), and $2299+ for Mac Pros (downgraded to quad-core).
Along those lines, I think Apple could drop the 4-core option on the Mac Pro line, leaving even more room for that midrange prosumer Mac. I'd actually like to see it more in the $1200-$1800 range with a 4-core option.
I'm waiting until June to see what happens, but if nothing comes I'll likely buy a Pro, despite the fact that it's more power than I need for more money than I want to spend. The iMac is a wonderful machine, but just doesn't fit me.
The 2.5" disk is in my opinion a good choice for the mini. It is especially more silent. I have a mini and an external 3.5" disk. I put the external disk on the ground because it vibrates too much.The mini doesn't need to get any smaller, it needs to get more powerful.
4GB Ram, Wireless-N, Perhaps a 3.5" HD (heat may be a factor), either x3100 or a dedicated (soldered on) GPU. Keeping FireWire would be beneficial as well.