Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The only variable, in terms of the depth of one's envy, is the level of their self-esteem.

haha, you're a funny one! My self esteem has nothing to do with me wanting the iPhone 3GS despite me having a 3G. I want it because its a better device and I'm a nerd, so these things attract me!
 
Looks like the big upgrade next year will be to a dual core processor (perhaps with further internal refinements based on Apple's chipmaker acquisitions) and then in 2011 the big update will be to LTE internet (based on AT&T's rollout plans). I think the 3GS will be a great to have while waiting for two years for a dual core, LTE device (with network!).
 
Now I feel great about waiting a year.

I'm perfectly happy with my iPhone 3G and would rather wait another year for a significant update to the iPhone. The 3Gs is nice but I don't see the need to fork out $599 to update.
 
I think this is where the iPhone is really going to take off and leave its rivals in the dust. Apple has spent a lot of resources on optimizing OS X at all levels for multiple cores in recent years, and while Palm, RIM, etc. can also use these multicore chips, and will no doubt have some threadable applications, I seriously doubt their tech will be anywhere near what Apple has because they haven't put in the time/effort/$ yet. Something that it's hard to just cram in on a tight schedule trying to play catch-up.
 
next year's keynotes will read something like this..

"announcing, our new iphone 3SS (super speed!) it's not x4 faster instead of x2 faster...it's so fast, it knows what you are going to do in the future and opens the app before you touch it!

one more thing....we now have the speed for background apps....steve, would you like to come out and demo this?"

crowd goes wild, the networks rub their hands for the money.
 
If they do put use the dual core processor in next year's iphone, isn't this going to have a big impact on the App Store? Its gonna get really confusing for consumers (this app requires 3G S MC or later?) and annoying for developers to choose whether to design to use the newest tech or not screw people with older devices.
 
This year I'm holding on to my 3G.

Next year I expect a multi-core iPhone with true multi-tasking and a revamped UI (nothing revolutionary, Apple is and has always been about gradual product evolution so let's not delude ourselves).

I figure that now that Apple has sorted out most of the laughable non-features like MMS or Copy/Paste they have time to start thinking ahead and come up with some neat UI changes.

For instance, I'd like the summerboard (is that what we call it?) to adjust when I flip to horizontal, maybe an App Cover Flow or something that at least shows some UI feedback from the device. Another example is a much needed customizable lock screen with important information accessible without having to "slide to unlock".

IMO, the 3GS is a transition product and I think we'll see the next big iPhone next summer.
 
Whatever. There will always be something new in the future.

Guess what, a year from now, there will also be something new in the future, so would you wait forever?
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5H11 Safari/525.20)

casik said:
exactally while I am waiting for the model after trhe 3GS

But even then there will be some other proccessor waiting in the shadows.
 
If they do put use the dual core processor in next year's iphone, isn't this going to have a big impact on the App Store? Its gonna get really confusing for consumers (this app requires 3G S MC or later?) and annoying for developers to choose whether to design to use the newest tech or not screw people with older devices.

You don't see any apps now for PC and Mac that require multi-core processors. Recommended, but not required.
 
Apple ARM

The next iPhone might have an Apple created processor. Remember, they bought that chip company a year or so ago...
 
everybody that bought a first generation iphone and skipped the 3g to get a 3gs is going to cry when the 4th generation iphone comes out. 3g was a big upgrade to the first generation. 3gs isn't as big of an upgrade to the 3g

I'm going to pretend you didn't say that.
 
Wouldn't this be in 4.0?

I figure that now that Apple has sorted out most of the laughable non-features like MMS or Copy/Paste they have time to start thinking ahead and come up with some neat UI changes.

For instance, I'd like the summerboard (is that what we call it?) to adjust when I flip to horizontal, maybe an App Cover Flow or something that at least shows some UI feedback from the device. Another example is a much needed customizable lock screen with important information accessible without having to "slide to unlock".

I'm slightly unsure here but wouldn't Apple release this as iPhone 4.0 instead of with an entirely new iPhone?
 
apple could use this chip in two ways

1. programming for everything to take advantage of both cores, and thus increasing speed by a huge margin. (but this would require multicore programming which has been available on PC + Mac for years and hasnt really come into its own)

2. Use 1 core for the system, and the other for 3rd party apps, this should prevent slowdown in system performance.
 
You got that backward. The 3G was a pretty minor upgrade. It added:
  1. 3G radio
  2. GPS

The 3G added:
  1. Faster Processor
  2. More RAM
  3. Storage increase
  4. Magnetometer
  5. Voice Interaction
  6. Video function


don't forget more megapixels, autofocus, and nike+ support on the 3G S. But yes, your point is right - the 3G was the tick, and the 3G S is the tock.
 
OK, it's settled then we will all cancel our orders for the 3GS and wait for the dual-core ARM iPhones with multi-tasking; a front facing camera; and using Verizon's 4G network. :rolleyes:
 
All this thread is (and ever will be) are people who bought the 3Gs saying multi-core isn't going to make it into the 2010 iPhone and people who are waiting for the 2010 iPhone saying its going to blow the 3Gs out of the water. Plus a sprinkling of people saying the 3Gs isn't a huge upgrade and the people who just bought one getting all uppity. How predictable the Apple world is....
 
How predictable the Apple world is....
That much is certain. :)

There will always be something new in the pipeline. That's the nature of technology. The key is to purchase what you need now. Those who purchase a 3Gs will have the best iPhone available until the next model is released.

However, if you wait for the latest and greatest, you will end up waiting forever and never get to enjoy technology.
 
I guess it depends on what you use your phone for. If you've been looking for video editing the 3G S is HUGE! However, if you wanted a convergence device to get rid of the GPS in your car then the 3G was also HUGE (bad example because of the GPS improvements in 3G S, but hopefully my point is somewhat clear).

THE HUGE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE GPS ARE IN THE 3.0 SOFTWARE.. Yes the compass helps but its not so much the hardware. Tom Tom is case in point .. It is for the iPhone 3g as well as iPhone 3gs.;)
 
This year I'm holding on to my 3G.

Next year I expect a multi-core iPhone with true multi-tasking and a revamped UI (nothing revolutionary, Apple is and has always been about gradual product evolution so let's not delude ourselves).

IMO, the 3GS is a transition product and I think we'll see the next big iPhone next summer.

I agree.

And don't forget updated features such as 64 GB, OLED screen and more bluetooth functionality!
 
For instance, I'd like the summerboard (is that what we call it?) to adjust when I flip to horizontal, maybe an App Cover Flow or something that at least shows some UI feedback from the device. Another example is a much needed customizable lock screen with important information accessible without having to "slide to unlock".

IMO, the 3GS is a transition product and I think we'll see the next big iPhone next summer.
I agree I'm holding on to my 3g and I think you are referring to SPRINGBOARD.
 
I don't believe this for a second. I remember them saying that cortex-A8 phones would be coming out end of 2007, then mid 2008. Now It is mid 2009 and we have exactly 1 cortex-A8 phone on the market (the palm pre) with the iphone about to follow. next-gen ARM phones never deliver on time. They can't, because there are too many people involved. There is ARM itself, which designs the core. Then there is TI, Samsung and many others who then build an actual SOC around the core, which in itself is dependent on many other factors. Then there are the device manufacturers who need to integrate these cores into their products. And this isn't exactly a drop-in die replacement we're talking about: these smartphones are herculean efforts of engineering.

No silicon vendor is sampling cortex-A9 chips, not even in limited quantities. It takes roughly a year from sampling to an actual svelte smartphone. I would say that 2011 is optimistic, 2010 unrealistic.

First, the headline is a little misleading. ARM doesn't "deliver" the technology in the way most people are thinking of, as they are fabless and don't sell their bare processors. They license their cores to people like texas instruments and samsung who build SoCs out of them. Before any traditional smartphone maker gets these cores, they have to wait fora SoC to be ready for sampling, then they have their own period of development. The only two people that can avoid this as I see it are samsung and apple since they both license the cores and make the phones and therefore having the ability to development technology at a faster rate than those who must wait for SoCs.

That being said, I don't see Apple as fearing Samsung for major smartphone market share (they've got RIM and potentially Palm to worry about). Therefore, they won't feel pressured to put out an A-9 phone in 2010 because it will alienate 3GS buyers and quickly segment iphone users into 3 hardware categories. A much more sensible upgrade scheme has them pushing out an A-9 iphone in 2011, about the time we can expect to see the first A-9 devices from competitors.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.