[...]
I'm fairly optimistic that the image editing features of Photos will mature - available Extensions are already a big step forward. But I'm not at all optimistic about the return of Aperture's database capabilities. While there were many pro-level database features I did not use, the ability to merge and split libraries would be huge for pros and amateurs alike, especially in managing/archiving the contents of the iCloud library. Technically, there's no reason they couldn't offer it - databases are quite adaptable in that regard. Bottom line, though, is that Apple doesn't seem interested in offering iCloud Photo Library as a professional resource. That goes back to the limits placed on PhotoStream. And I can see why. Pros would be very demanding in areas like speed and reliability. They'd want ways to manage multiple cloud-based libraries on a single account, they'd want copy-protected shared albums (for client viewing), and they'd be really hard to deal with if even part of a shoot was lost or damaged. I don't think they want to go there (but it's a shame).
I couldn't care less about cloud storage. I already have the on-site storage and off-site storage anyways, why would I want to pay double for client-side viewing?
Offer a way to integrate into websites, you know, they actually had that already implemented. You could create photo websites and to be frank, they were pretty top-notch for client-picks etc.
What I don't understand is how this cloud thing that now "has to be solved by someone else" anyways is the hold up for at least a) keeping the DAM features alive by moving them to Photos (Photos isn't even great for amateur sorting hierarchically, too much "smartness" involved for my private and professional taste.)
b) the non-destructive edits of many years are now locked in a software that will eventually stop working on my main Mac. I'm sure Photos could use some legacy or converting support.
I can still open super old Photoshop files in later versions.
I can still open super old Word documents from Windows 98 times in Word or hell, pretty much any other Office suite.
Apple and their disrespect for legacy support is an old tale, I know, but boy it doesn't change the fact they need to step up their game.
Deprecation as a means of clean code and less bugs is a nice concept, but their yearly OS upgrades never seemed to quite reach the level of polish as most of the prior versions I had the joy to work with.
I must say, if their software QA is tanking as it is, the least they could add is better legacy support, because sometimes old software/files/etc are NOT replaced by better, newer versions. Sometimes things die and if I want to have a buggy experience I might as well invest more in Windows again, at least Microsoft acknowledges backwards compatibility properly.
(I won't use Windows as my main OS of choice for a long time to come I think, but that's because the list of cons outweighs the list of pros. It's sad, because Apple wasn't a company I started shopping from because they merely were less BS.)
Glassed Silver:mac