More power to you!!
Enjoy.
I'll go study my maths....
I don't want to round off 7% again & get "schooled". ;0)
Uh. Schooling you do need. If you want to say that A is twice as fast as B, 50% won't do it either. The percentage you're looking for is 100%. For A to be twice as fast as B, it needs to be an 100% improvement over B.
50% only works if you want to say that B is half as fast as A.
Now looking at your original post:
"The P9 & P10 got single-core Geekbench scores of 1699 and 1884 respectively.
Whereas, iPhone 6S & 7 got 2353 and 3294."
You could compare the P9 with the 6S. The P9 is a little newer, but it was launched in April 2016, long before the iPhone 7, which is in the Mate 9/P10 generation.
Just taking your figures, the iPhone 6S is thus (2353 - 1699) / 1699 ~= 38% faster at the single-core synthetic benchmark compared to the P9. However while you got the iPhone 6S score right, the
source shows 1738 for the P9, which puts the difference down to 35% (if you'll argue benchmark scores, at least be honest about them!).
On the multi-core side, it's 3939 (iPhone 6S) vs 4856 (P9), so the P9 has about 23% more total CPU speed.
Not that all this matters in the slightest. In day-to-day use it's fast and smooth.
Really, for twice the price, the iPhone should do
everything much, much better.
And it doesn't. It's worse on many accounts, and hilariously worse on many other accounts.