Originally posted by Mattski
Either Apple needs to release a low-cost player or allow iTunes to work with non iPod devices in order to create a system that works for the broad population.
and everybody knows, that if one kid has a new toy the other ones also want a new toy! and not all the people have only one kid at home...Originally posted by alandail
2 or 4 gigs isn't enough for my library, but is enough for my kids
Originally posted by cr2sh
I think that was the way of the old apple... look at the newest powerbooks. No demand/supply issues there.
Originally posted by hokka
I've heard horribe stories about Flash based storage solutions, a distributors (not reseller) friend of mine here in Oz stopped selling the 1GB version as it's basically 2 x 512MB soldered together (on top of each other - since there are no commercially/readily available 1GB or more at this time), and so much "leakage" occurs between the two cards have resulted so much data-loss almost all were returned... So I wouldn't trust anything more than 512MB at the moment (until there are a single 1GB+ version available at a reasonable price which is still a few years down the track, or until digital cameras go beyond 20Million pixels or something)
Originally posted by Steven1621
what is apple thinking? the need to upgrade the xserve line asap. how can they sleep at night knowing that they are selling severs with antiquated chips in them?
Nope, the economics simply isn't there. It's open knowledge at this point but record companies take 2/3 off the $.99 right off the bat. That leaves Apple with $.33 to pay for the bandwidth, servers, processing of AAC files and artwork, development and maintenance of the site, and marketing. Apple hopes to move 100 mil songs this year. At $.05 a song, that nets them 5 mil in profits. Big whoop di doo.Originally posted by alandail
Despite what Apple says, I believe they expect the iTunes Music Store to become a significant profit generator over time.
Originally posted by singletrack
It worked ok with the Creative Muvo NX I plugged in a while back. There's support for quite a few non-iPod devices already.
So how do you maintain the data when the iPod is turned off? Are you proposing that the iPod is kept at a permanent low-power state?? And you do that with a battery??? And when the battery is finally drained, what happens????Originally posted by zapp
RAM is much cheaper than flash, what if apple used ram instead of CF or HD. The battery is built in, so you don't have to worry about losing the storage switching batteries. I am sure with buying in bulk apple could put together 2-4 storage gb easy. Power consumption would be very low even when playing music( no hard drive to spin). It would ruin it for a backup device, but it is workable as a audio player. Also, no moving parts, fast data access, and fast loads. They can have the OS in ROM then all the music in ram. Kinda like the palm pilot. And it would fit into the smaller form factor rumor, and keep the price low.
Yeah but all the pimps will be lining up to get one.Originally posted by latergator116
Sorry, gold is a really tacky color![]()
While I'm not too sure about your pricing of the 1" HDD drives (Apple could be striking an exclusive deal that no one is anticipating, like they did with the original 1.8" drives), I agree that there is definitely a market for an Apple-branded, flash-based MP3 player. If Apple indeed sold a $100 miniPod with a removable flash slot, they would OWN the digital music market. They just need to make sure it's as slick and user-friendly as the current iPod-iTunes experience. Make it all USB2.0 standard.Originally posted by stingerman
For a dose of reality the 2GB and 4GB 1" drives are expensive. Toshiba makes them in limited quantities. The current drive is 1.8" and only in the next couple of months will production ramp up to 600,000 1.8" drives / month. So, don't expect a 2-4GB iPod any time soon. The las music show had Apple approaching 40% of the MP3 players shipped, the rest were mainly cheap flash players.
Well, there is not one flash player that I know of that plays Fairplay DRM tunes. That is a mighty big whole for the 60% of the other market. A 128-256MB Flash iPod player would allow Apple to seal up the MP3 player market, wthout hurting HD iPod sales. They are two completely different markets and Apple can keep them separate on size, functions and price. (Whereas 2-4GB gets awfully close to being enough to hurt the high-end iPod line.)
So, for the reasons listed above, Apple will release a Flash based iPod with up to 256MB that can play iTunes tracks. Apple's distribution channel for iPods is huge and they will sell into this huge channel. Now instead of paying $129 for a Creative Muvo, I would buy a flash iPod. My iTunes tracks will play on my flash player as well as my iPod. In the future, people who buy the flash will want to buy an iPod with their music collection growing.
Retail stores will only carry so many lines on their shelves, and Apple can lock up the market as well.
Originally posted by pmh
I was thinking more like this:
1GB $99
2GB $149
4GB $199
10GB $299
20GB $399
40GB $499
Originally posted by mr.iso
http://bizns.nikkeibp.co.jp/cgi-bin/asia/frame-asia.pl?NSH_KIJIID=237219&NSH_CHTML=asiabiztech.html
boom
This is way cool!Originally posted by mr.iso
http://bizns.nikkeibp.co.jp/cgi-bin/asia/frame-asia.pl?NSH_KIJIID=237219&NSH_CHTML=asiabiztech.html
boom
Originally posted by dongmin
Make it all USB2.0 standard.