Originally posted by liloconf
I noticed that the keynote will be streamed live. I don't remember if that is something that happens often. I want to open up the stream and see steve present the 970 to the world. hehe the scream of shock heard round the world....
Originally posted by richard5mith
Now this means that Apple can easily introduce native AAC to iTunes and the iPod. The dual ARM processors in the PP5002 mean they could probably get OGG support in there as well, as it has plenty processing power even if it's not native. The EIDE controller might mean it's possible to plug in a firewire CD-RW and burn off CD's straight from the iPod. And the fact that it can encode real time MP3 would allow them to offer a firewire microphone and 3-4 hours solid recording.
Originally posted by Chomolungma
Why would you want to burn a CD, when you already have an iPod? Unless you want to give your music to someone else, then this would at least legit reason. I'm sure the RIAA will disapprove
With ubiquitous external HD and ever increasing storage capacity, I honestly don't see a need for a an optical drive storage media (CD, DVD). I find it weird that people still ask for this in their computer. I wish my TiBook has a removable DVD drive. I like a second battery in its place. I'm going off on a tangent![]()
![]()
Originally posted by Brandon Sharitt
I think we will see small upgrades across all Mac lines(like speed bumps) until the 970. I agree with the article about the implementation of the 970, first in the Xserve and then in PowerMacs and/or in a new work station model by years end. Maybe the PowerBook will get faster G4s, that way the iBook can get those 1GHz G3s IBM has.
[/i]
Originally posted by edvniow
Well that definately confirms it then!
Originally posted by adamcoop
If Apple was to ship a 970 equipped X-Serve before the PowerMacs, they can expect to sell zero desktop units until they put the new chips in the PowerMacs.
How do you KNOW that? MacWorld isn't all about Apple, ya know. It's all about Apple and peripherals that work with Macintoshes.Originally posted by pyrotoaster
While Apple doesn't organize and run the show (IDG does), there wouldn't be a high enough attendance at an Apple-less show.
Originally posted by MacCoaster
...we have to wait and see if attendance drops.
Originally posted by richard5mith
IIf all these features were enabled at the beginning you'd get huge demand, wouldn't meet supply, annoy customers and have high production costs because your processes weren't in place yet. But if you introduced these features gradually, there'd be no supply problems, you'd keep on selling them for longer, you'd make more money because your production processes had been refined and you wouldn't anger the early buyers because they'd get all the new features too - as all it takes to enable these things is a software upgrade. Makes good business sense.
And then of course there's that strange headphone socket...
Originally posted by Cappy
It only makes some good business sense if they account for how soon competitors will have the same or superior functions. There's also not exactly a huge market looking for other audio formats. I'm sure they'll include whatever Quicktime supports at some point in the future but for now, mp3 is what sells these things.
Frankly I would expect them to incorporate bluetooth in it some time soon to allow for wireless headphones. It would also open up a new 3rd party market to help popularize the ipod if you can also connect mics by way of bluetooth. Many folks want bluetooth for data transfer to their Macs and PC's but tend to forget that bluetooth is too slow for that as well as then they would probably forget to keep the unit charged.![]()
Originally posted by lmalave
That's a very good point - Apple has to integrate Bluetooth in the iPods ASAP in order to accomodate future use (like wireless headphones)
Originally posted by dstorey
The problem I see with bluetooth headphones is that headphones have a happy knack of falling out and when they are wireless how easy would they be to lose or smash even when they hit the floor...
Originally posted by neilg
All the ideas to extend the functionality of the ipod are great but as far as I'm concerned until Apple sort out the ipod's battery life-expectancy problems, it's all wishfull thinking.
I bought a 10gb ipod in October and after only a few months use I'm getting only about 2 hours max use from the battery - it's advertised as having 10 hours!. Check on any of the ipod sites that are around and you'll find that lots of people are having the same problem.
I love my ipod and don't regret for a minute the money I spent on it, but if you wanted to add any extra features- especially recording, or colour screens- I can only see battery life expectancy plummeting to something that would make the unit practically useless!
This battery life issue is a problem that Apple need to address and which they overtly have not done so (there is NO official mention of the issue anywhere on the Apple site)- it is also an issue that could harm sales of the current model, and any future 'enhanced' models, should rumour of it get out to mainstream consumers...
Originally posted by GeneR
This thought:
How about an iPod which doesn't have to have a keyboard but a microphone?
AND THEN (drum roll please), instead of needing a keyboard or special short strokes, have a good Viavoice program native to iPod OS with a record button on it.
![]()