![]()
take note:
- keyboard (obvi)
- scrolling keys (beside space bar) for up and down movements
- no command key for copy and pastehaha
hope you likee
Guys... this hasn't actually been released! Chill!
![]()
take note:
- keyboard (obvi)
- scrolling keys (beside space bar) for up and down movements
- no command key for copy and pastehaha
hope you likee
You forgot the Windows key.
It isnt for mePerhaps you don't do much on yours.
Scrolling through long web pages or documents is a true pain on the iPhone. If not physical cursor keys, then an on-screen button or scrollbar would be very beneficial. In all the touch projects I've done where I've included fingertip scrolling, I've always also supported key-based scrolling. It's a ton easier in many cases, especially with one-handed operation.
Touchscreen phones have been around a very long time.
The main point of the iPhone was to simplify the UI.
Really? How many full touchscreen phones were there before the iPhone? And how many are there now? Thought so
![]()
take note:
- keyboard (obvi)
- scrolling keys (beside space bar) for up and down movements
- no command key for copy and pastehaha
hope you likee
I just threw up in my mouth a little bit...
does anyone know when it's released and at what price?
thanks
it would make it fat
sadly your design is not pratical, explain to me how you would press the 1 key without switching your phone on silent ?
Really? How many full touchscreen phones were there before the iPhone? And how many are there now? Thought so
Please define "full touchscreen". If you mean one without buttons, the iPhone doesn't fit that description. Just as with other phones, it's got physical buttons for several common needs. It does have fewer convenience buttons than most phones.
If by "full touchscreen" you're trying to say that most of its functionality is done by touch, then you can do that on hundreds of previous phones, no matter how many buttons they also had. You can actually do more by touch on them. But you weren't forced to.
Heck, the iPhone totally relies on a physical button (home) to even be usable.
Perhaps what you meant was that it was the first widely available civilian production smartphone with a UI designed for finger navigation? I certainly agree with that, as that's what I said previously... it's the UI that was the important difference, not the touchscreen itself.
They may not be finger friendly touchscreens, but touch screen technology and phones have been around for a very long time.
This is what it would look like if the iPhone had physical keys: