I have to agree even though I've been a Mac user since 1994. I'm not the type of person who really wants to pay premium for form. I don't care how heavy my laptop is or how sleek it looks out in public. What I would rather have is a fast laptop that offers current technology at a reasonable price. It's a bonus if it runs OS X too! We Mac users have to pay quite a bit extra to have something that looks cool even if it's outdated or missing features found on average PC laptops that cost a lot less.
I also think it's funny how people are suggesting that the OP just buy an Apple laptop that costs less. The price ratio of what you're buying doesn't jive with the cost. Why should they settle for less computer just because Apple over-charges compared to what the market offers? If it weren't for OS X, I'd probably bail too. Windows 7 is looking good, so who knows? I'd like to see some competition that would cause Apple to compete.
I think you're overlooking the whole software + hardware combo. You mention that you stick around simply for the fact that you like using OS X. But part of that charm of using this operating system is the fact that there are no drivers to install, because its a package deal with the reliable hardware. I looked into using a PC laptop and using hackintosh software, to save myself money. But when it came down to it I didn't want to deal with that, I wanted reliability and ease of use. So I bought another Apple machine.
Competition is indeed good for Apple, and I do agree their prices are a little ridiculous, but guess what? People keep paying it. Apple makes no mistake about it, with the way their bank accounts & quarterly's look, they are in no rush to chase the low end. Instead of Apple users being portrayed as geeky and far outnumbered, today they are trendy/hip/creative. This almost gives them more power to remain at the high end since it's seen as some sort of status symbol in the computer world that you use a Mac.
I've installed Windows 7 on an old desktop to check it out, but like honestly it took MS that long to come up with something that reliable? I mean honestly, it seriously shouldn't take that long to copy Apple. The programs docking at the bottom of the screen, wonder where they came up with that. Also in Vista their "gadgets." I wanted to die laughing, they've slipped into the following, not leading position.