How would it be pointless? The original point of StreetView was to send vehicles out to actually drive the roads and improve the maps. The photos could assist in reading signs for speed limits and one-way streets, and the GPS data could help improve the maps. This isn't new, Garmin and other companies had been doing similar things for years to help improve their maps, that's how the "base map" that Google and Apple started with was made. Apple would be stupid to NOT be doing this to help improve their maps.
With that said, maybe it was Googles plan all along, but given how awful the original street view photos were, I don't think they ever intended to make the images public. Rather they used them internally to improve maps. Somebody likely said one day "Hey, maybe our users would find these images useful."
If I were to throw in my guess as to what Apple is doing, I would say it's a mix between street view and flyover. Flyover looks great from far away, but is pretty rough at street level. If Apple is driving around and taking "flyover" photos at street level, that could create something as useful as street view, but have it actually have dimension instead of being flat photos. That could be really useful and cool, while also serving the basic purpose of improving map data.
Nah. I quit astroturfing for Samsung a long time ago. I'm working for the NSA these days.
So yeah, I have tons of inside info. On everyone. O_0
How do they know it's an Apple minivan if it has no markings? Maybe it's speculation, or maybe it's really a Samsung van spying on Apple.
How would it be pointless? The original point of StreetView was to send vehicles out to actually drive the roads and improve the maps. The photos could assist in reading signs for speed limits and one-way streets, and the GPS data could help improve the maps. This isn't new, Garmin and other companies had been doing similar things for years to help improve their maps, that's how the "base map" that Google and Apple started with was made. Apple would be stupid to NOT be doing this to help improve their maps.
With that said, maybe it was Googles plan all along, but given how awful the original street view photos were, I don't think they ever intended to make the images public. Rather they used them internally to improve maps. Somebody likely said one day "Hey, maybe our users would find these images useful."
If I were to throw in my guess as to what Apple is doing, I would say it's a mix between street view and flyover. Flyover looks great from far away, but is pretty rough at street level. If Apple is driving around and taking "flyover" photos at street level, that could create something as useful as street view, but have it actually have dimension instead of being flat photos. That could be really useful and cool, while also serving the basic purpose of improving map data.
How would it be pointless? The original point of StreetView was to send vehicles out to actually drive the roads and improve the maps. The photos could assist in reading signs for speed limits and one-way streets, and the GPS data could help improve the maps. This isn't new, Garmin and other companies had been doing similar things for years to help improve their maps, that's how the "base map" that Google and Apple started with was made. Apple would be stupid to NOT be doing this to help improve their maps.
With that said, maybe it was Googles plan all along, but given how awful the original street view photos were, I don't think they ever intended to make the images public. Rather they used them internally to improve maps. Somebody likely said one day "Hey, maybe our users would find these images useful."
If I were to throw in my guess as to what Apple is doing, I would say it's a mix between street view and flyover. Flyover looks great from far away, but is pretty rough at street level. If Apple is driving around and taking "flyover" photos at street level, that could create something as useful as street view, but have it actually have dimension instead of being flat photos. That could be really useful and cool, while also serving the basic purpose of improving map data.
NO HANDS on the steering wheel (except u-turn)
For the reason you listed: many many companies have already done this - coupled with the fact that it is an ENORMOUS undertaking, and Google already has a version available to the public. It just seems like a waste of money.
Maybe if they have some plan to implement the pictures/3D mapping into something much larger I could understand it. But it seems like there has to be a better way to get "street view" than to try build it from the ground up when the competition is miles ahead.
Came upon this van this afternoon on 101 southbound in Palo Alto. This was between Embarcadero and San Antonio Road. Passed it so not sure where it exited. It was being operated by a man and there was a second individual in the passenger seat.
First off, the minivan is pretty close to being the same silver color as the iPhone 6. Secondly, if it were Samsung, they'd be driving Kias, not Dodge.
Came upon this van this afternoon on 101 southbound in Palo Alto. This was between Embarcadero and San Antonio Road. Passed it so not sure where it exited. It was being operated by a man and there was a second individual in the passenger seat.
This is silly. It's like saying Apple would not make a smartphone because Blackberry is way far ahead. The data might exist, but if it doesnt belong to Apple, it does them no good.
Interesting that they are driving these cars on Sunday.
Not trying to claim Apple couldn't do it, just that there might be an easier way to obtain the data. Developing a system to collect it, mount it, hire people to drive, etc., etc., and so on. When it's been done before just seems overly complex. I have no doubt they could do it.