Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Next week Apple will be driving these prototype vans in collaboration with Disney. Drivers may or may not be disguised as Rick Moranis.

Quwydd6.jpg
 
Super clever!

What we see is a coolest slickest vehicle ever built. An Ive-Mobile cloaked inside the hull of a Dodge minivan.

Just like those Zune-looking iPod cases that were made to prevent theft back in 2007.
 
How would it be pointless? The original point of StreetView was to send vehicles out to actually drive the roads and improve the maps. The photos could assist in reading signs for speed limits and one-way streets, and the GPS data could help improve the maps. This isn't new, Garmin and other companies had been doing similar things for years to help improve their maps, that's how the "base map" that Google and Apple started with was made. Apple would be stupid to NOT be doing this to help improve their maps.

With that said, maybe it was Googles plan all along, but given how awful the original street view photos were, I don't think they ever intended to make the images public. Rather they used them internally to improve maps. Somebody likely said one day "Hey, maybe our users would find these images useful."

If I were to throw in my guess as to what Apple is doing, I would say it's a mix between street view and flyover. Flyover looks great from far away, but is pretty rough at street level. If Apple is driving around and taking "flyover" photos at street level, that could create something as useful as street view, but have it actually have dimension instead of being flat photos. That could be really useful and cool, while also serving the basic purpose of improving map data.

+1 - I too think this is for a flyover version of street view. Airplanes get the top down data pretty well but they need to augment that data with the street level details. In the end if fused properly this data could be incredibly precise and realistic. Imagine pinch to zoom from above california and just keep zooming in until you are looking at the place as though you are standing right in front of it, all texture mapped 3d.
 
Wow, is that really the new Apple iVan? If so, its amazing. I love the rims on it!
 
How do they know it's an Apple minivan if it has no markings? Maybe it's speculation, or maybe it's really a Samsung van spying on Apple.

Or it could be a Samsung copy of Apple's van. For all we know, the van in the video isn't Apple's, and Samsung thought to copy it since the first article about it was published. Knowing Samsung, they'd copy it without knowledge of what Apple is actually using it for :eek:
 
Last edited:
How would it be pointless? The original point of StreetView was to send vehicles out to actually drive the roads and improve the maps. The photos could assist in reading signs for speed limits and one-way streets, and the GPS data could help improve the maps. This isn't new, Garmin and other companies had been doing similar things for years to help improve their maps, that's how the "base map" that Google and Apple started with was made. Apple would be stupid to NOT be doing this to help improve their maps.

With that said, maybe it was Googles plan all along, but given how awful the original street view photos were, I don't think they ever intended to make the images public. Rather they used them internally to improve maps. Somebody likely said one day "Hey, maybe our users would find these images useful."

If I were to throw in my guess as to what Apple is doing, I would say it's a mix between street view and flyover. Flyover looks great from far away, but is pretty rough at street level. If Apple is driving around and taking "flyover" photos at street level, that could create something as useful as street view, but have it actually have dimension instead of being flat photos. That could be really useful and cool, while also serving the basic purpose of improving map data.

So in addition to "flyover", we'll get "drivearound"? ;)

Seriously, that's the most logical thing so far and I'm looking forward to see the end result.
 
How would it be pointless? The original point of StreetView was to send vehicles out to actually drive the roads and improve the maps. The photos could assist in reading signs for speed limits and one-way streets, and the GPS data could help improve the maps. This isn't new, Garmin and other companies had been doing similar things for years to help improve their maps, that's how the "base map" that Google and Apple started with was made. Apple would be stupid to NOT be doing this to help improve their maps.

With that said, maybe it was Googles plan all along, but given how awful the original street view photos were, I don't think they ever intended to make the images public. Rather they used them internally to improve maps. Somebody likely said one day "Hey, maybe our users would find these images useful."

If I were to throw in my guess as to what Apple is doing, I would say it's a mix between street view and flyover. Flyover looks great from far away, but is pretty rough at street level. If Apple is driving around and taking "flyover" photos at street level, that could create something as useful as street view, but have it actually have dimension instead of being flat photos. That could be really useful and cool, while also serving the basic purpose of improving map data.

For the reason you listed: many many companies have already done this - coupled with the fact that it is an ENORMOUS undertaking, and Google already has a version available to the public. It just seems like a waste of money.

Maybe if they have some plan to implement the pictures/3D mapping into something much larger I could understand it. But it seems like there has to be a better way to get "street view" than to try build it from the ground up when the competition is miles ahead ;).
 
NO HANDS on the steering wheel (except u-turn)

I don't think so, I was looking for that as well. But you can see him with his hands on the wheel even as he drives off on the straight road.

It's only unclear during the first pass towards the u-turn, but because the driver is so close to the window his hands could be at the bottom of the wheel (I'd also drive like that on the straight).

But it doesn't say much, even if Apple is testing a self-driving car the driver should still be able to take over at a moment's notice. Since they'd be personally liable for any accident.
 
For the reason you listed: many many companies have already done this - coupled with the fact that it is an ENORMOUS undertaking, and Google already has a version available to the public. It just seems like a waste of money.

Maybe if they have some plan to implement the pictures/3D mapping into something much larger I could understand it. But it seems like there has to be a better way to get "street view" than to try build it from the ground up when the competition is miles ahead ;).

This is silly. It's like saying Apple would not make a smartphone because Blackberry is way far ahead. The data might exist, but if it doesnt belong to Apple, it does them no good.
 
Know one would know what these vans are for just filling in no news again. I myself are getting sick of these rumour sites and gong to stop looking at them and delete. iMore is the only site which gets my vote.
 
Came upon this van this afternoon on 101 southbound in Palo Alto. This was between Embarcadero and San Antonio Road. Passed it so not sure where it exited. It was being operated by a man and there was a second individual in the passenger seat.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    737.4 KB · Views: 292
Came upon this van this afternoon on 101 southbound in Palo Alto. This was between Embarcadero and San Antonio Road. Passed it so not sure where it exited. It was being operated by a man and there was a second individual in the passenger seat.

Interesting that they are driving these cars on Sunday.
 
First off, the minivan is pretty close to being the same silver color as the iPhone 6. Secondly, if it were Samsung, they'd be driving Kias, not Dodge.

But why would Apple drive Dodge? Nobody likes Dodge. :p

----------

Came upon this van this afternoon on 101 southbound in Palo Alto. This was between Embarcadero and San Antonio Road. Passed it so not sure where it exited. It was being operated by a man and there was a second individual in the passenger seat.

+1 for the great picture. That's a lot more detailed than what the video showed. All that strange equipment on it makes me curious.
 
Fight the Google Street View

It would appear to me that the higher mast-mounted cameras on the Google vehicles would be more effective from a higher vantage point. It allows a further view and down angle and the view clears more of the road with the camera being higher than most vehicles. Of course, I'm not passing judgment until I see how good the Apple Street View might be. I'm just thinking, the less obstructions to block the view the better the experience would be. I'm sure Apple must know what it's doing and these could simply be prototype vehicles and eventually Apple will refine the process if it doesn't turn out as well as they expected. I'm really hoping for a good Apple Street View which is my one of my most favorite features in Google Maps. The next best feature is Google mapping bicycle routes (Greenway System) which I definitely get a lot of use out of.
 
This is silly. It's like saying Apple would not make a smartphone because Blackberry is way far ahead. The data might exist, but if it doesnt belong to Apple, it does them no good.

Not trying to claim Apple couldn't do it, just that there might be an easier way to obtain the data. Developing a system to collect it, mount it, hire people to drive, etc., etc., and so on. When it's been done before just seems overly complex. I have no doubt they could do it.
 
Interesting that they are driving these cars on Sunday.

Probably street view. They don't want too much traffic on street view. :)

It would be nice to have "video" street view. Not just photos like Google. For example where you can actually "drive" without having to go photo by photo.

Whatever I am selling GOOG and buying AAPL on first minute market open.
 
Not trying to claim Apple couldn't do it, just that there might be an easier way to obtain the data. Developing a system to collect it, mount it, hire people to drive, etc., etc., and so on. When it's been done before just seems overly complex. I have no doubt they could do it.

That's true, but if in fact they are building 3D models a la flyover, then that data wouldn't be available. So that would explain why they're getting their own data.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.